World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew S. Kowalski

Andrew S. Kowalski

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
20108
World Ranking
7236
National Ranking
213

Andrew S. Kowalski publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew S. Kowalski sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 136 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Andrew S. Kowalski D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew S. Kowalski sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew S. Kowalski is affiliated with the University of Granada in Spain and has contributed to research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Environmental Science. Their scholarly work spans multiple subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Hematology, Oncology, Atmospheric Science, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The researcher has addressed several main topics in their publications, among which are:

  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • CAR-T Cell Therapy Research
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research

Andrew S. Kowalski frequently publishes alongside a group of coauthors including Dickran Kazandjian, Penélope Serrano-Ortíz, Ola Landgren, Benjamin Diamond, and David G. Coffey.

Their work appears in several recurring publication venues such as:

  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma
  • Blood
  • Biogeosciences
  • Boundary-Layer Meteorology

Representative recent papers authored or coauthored by Kowalski include:

  • "T cell redirecting bispecific antibodies for multiple myeloma: emerging therapeutic strategies in a changing treatment landscape," 2022, Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma
  • "Tocilizumab Prophylaxis for Patients Treated with Teclistamab: A Single-Center Experience," 2023, Blood
  • "The temporary effect of weed-cover maintenance on transpiration and carbon assimilation of olive trees," 2022, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • "High dose cyclophosphamide for cytoreduction in patients with acute myeloid leukemia with hyperleukocytosis or leukostasis," 2020, Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma
  • "Disentangling Turbulent Gas Diffusion from Non-diffusive Transport in the Boundary Layer," 2021, Boundary-Layer Meteorology

Best Publications

  • Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites

    Kell Wilson;Allen Goldstein;Eva Falge;Marc Aubinet

  • Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology

    Marc Aubinet;Achim Grelle;Andreas Ibrom;Üllar Rannik

  • Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange

    E. Falge;D. Baldocchi;R. Olson;P. Anthoni

  • Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests

    R. Valentini;G. Matteucci;A. J. Dolman;E.-D. Schulze

  • The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data

    Gilberto Pastorello;Carlo Trotta;Eleonora Canfora;Housen Chu

  • The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests

    Federico Magnani;Maurizio Mencuccini;Marco Borghetti;Paul Berbigier

  • Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests

    I. A. Janssens;H. Lankreijer;G. Matteucci;A. S. Kowalski

  • Seasonality of ecosystem respiration and gross primary production as derived from FLUXNET measurements

    Eva Falge;Dennis Baldocchi;John Tenhunen;Marc Aubinet

  • Gap filling strategies for long term energy flux data sets

    Eva Falge;Dennis D. Baldocchi;Richard Olson;Peter Anthoni

  • Assessing forest soil CO2 efflux: an in situ comparison of four techniques

    Ivan A. Janssens;Andrew S. Kowalski;Bernard Longdoz;Reinhart Ceulemans

  • Net ecosystem CO2 exchange of mixed forest in Belgium over 5 years

    Arnaud Carrara;Andrew S Kowalski;Johan Neirynck;Ivan A Janssens

  • Hidden, abiotic CO2 flows and gaseous reservoirs in the terrestrial carbon cycle: Review and perspectives

    Penélope Serrano-Ortiz;Marilyn Roland;Sergio Sanchez-Moral;Ivan A. Janssens

  • Paired comparisons of carbon exchange between undisturbed and regenerating stands in four managed forests in Europe

    Andrew S. Kowalski;Denis Loustau;Paul Berbigier;Giovanni Manca

  • Phase and amplitude of ecosystem carbon release and uptake potentials as derived from FLUXNET measurements

    Eva Falge;John Tenhunen;Dennis Baldocchi;Marc Aubinet

  • Forest floor CO2 fluxes estimated by eddy covariance and chamber-based model

    Ivan A Janssens;Andrew S Kowalski;Reinhart Ceulemans

  • Analyzing the Ecosystem Carbon Dynamics of Four European Coniferous Forests Using a Biogeochemistry Model

    Galina Churkina;John Tenhunen;Peter Thornton;Eva M. Falge

  • ICOS eddy covariance flux-station site setup: a review

    Corinna Rebmann;Marc Aubinet;Hape Schmid;Nicola Arriga

  • Can flux tower research neglect geochemical **CO2** exchange?

    Andrew S. Kowalski;Penélope Serrano-Ortiz;Ivan A. Janssens;Sergio Sánchez-Moral

  • Short-term CO2(g) exchange between a shallow karstic cavity and the external atmosphere during summer: Role of the surface soil layer

    S. Cuezva;A. Fernandez-Cortes;D. Benavente;P. Serrano-Ortiz

  • Towards long-term standardised carbon and greenhouse gas observations for monitoring Europe's terrestrial ecosystems: a review

    Daniela Franz;Manuel Acosta;Núria Altimir;Nicola Arriga

  • Water flux estimates from a Belgian Scots pine stand: a comparison of different approaches

    L Meiresonne;D.A Sampson;A.S Kowalski;I.A Janssens

Frequent Co-Authors

Francisco Domingo
Francisco Domingo Spanish National Research Council
Reinhart Ceulemans
Reinhart Ceulemans University of Antwerp
Marc Aubinet
Marc Aubinet University of Liège
Üllar Rannik
Üllar Rannik University of Helsinki
Timo Vesala
Timo Vesala University of Helsinki
Corinna Rebmann
Corinna Rebmann Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Ivan A. Janssens
Ivan A. Janssens University of Antwerp
Kim Pilegaard
Kim Pilegaard Technical University of Denmark
Denis Loustau
Denis Loustau International Sleep Products Association

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in broadening their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degree options can open diverse career opportunities. Educators passionate about sustainability might consider advancing their qualifications through online eds to edd programs, which combine leadership skills with environmental education.

Social work professionals focused on environmental justice and community health can benefit from specialized training offered by online dsw programs. These degrees equip learners with the tools to tackle social and environmental challenges effectively.

For students seeking flexible study options, an affordable online general studies degree provides a broad foundation that can be tailored to environmental topics, offering a cost-effective way to gain knowledge and skills relevant to the field.

Additionally, those new to higher education or considering a career change may explore the easiest bachelors degree programs, which often feature flexible curricula and supportive resources to help students complete their studies successfully while integrating environmental science components.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew S. Kowalski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles