World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 60 1956 49 165 13478

Anton K. Raap publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anton K. Raap between 1982 and 2012, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anton K. Raap published across 31 years, from 1982 to 2012, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 1996. 2 of the 202 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2012. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 1996. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 15 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 22 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication
1982 2012

202 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anton K. Raap: publications per year, 1982 to 2012
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 2
1984 3
1985 1
1986 3
1987 3
1988 5
1989 8
1990 7
1991 15
1992 16
1993 10
1994 5
1995 10
1996 22
1997 14
1998 11
1999 10
2000 6
2001 4
2002 6
2003 5
2004 18
2005 5
2006 4
2007 5
2008 0
2009 1
2010 0
2011 1
2012 1
Total 202
Download as CSV

Anton K. Raap publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anton K. Raap sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 157–166 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 165 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159 165
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Anton K. Raap D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anton K. Raap sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120 60
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Anton K. Raap is affiliated with Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands. Their professional profile is characterized by contributions to academic research within this institution.

While specific publications, research papers, or co-authors are not listed, the scientist's ongoing affiliation suggests active engagement in medical or biomedical research activities. The absence of publicly available recent papers or listed research topics indicates a more private or emerging academic profile.

No detailed information on fields of study, subfields, or principal research topics has been recorded, which limits the ability to outline a defined specialization or research focus.

Similarly, there are no published books or contributions recorded from this author, and no awards or honors have been documented to date.

This profile reflects current engagement without further publicly indexed outputs or collaborations that could be used to delineate a broader academic footprint.

Best Publications

  • Heterogeneity in Telomere Length of Human Chromosomes

    Peter M. Lansdorp;Nico P. Verwoerd;Frans M. van de Rijke;Visia Dragowska

  • Up-converting phosphor reporters for nucleic acid microarrays.

    Frans van de Rijke;Henry Zijlmans;Shang Li;Tim Vail

  • Telomeres in the mouse have large inter-chromosomal variations in the number of T2AG3 repeats

    J. M. J. M. Zijlmans;U. M. Martens;S. S. S. Poon;A. K. Raap

  • In situ hybridization as a tool to study numerical chromosome aberrations in solid bladder tumors.

    A. H. N. Hopman;F. C. S. Ramaekers;A. K. Raap;J. L. M. Beck

  • Mitochondrial Diabetes: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Presentation

    J. Antonie Maassen;Leen. M. ‘t Hart;Einar van Essen;Rob J. Heine

  • Can, a putative oncogene associated with myeloid leukemogenesis, may be activated by fusion of its 3' half to different genes: characterization of the set gene.

    M von Lindern;S van Baal;J Wiegant;A Raap

  • In situ genotyping individual DNA molecules by target-primed rolling-circle amplification of padlock probes

    Chatarina Larsson;Jørn Koch;Anders Nygren;George Janssen

  • Multiple fluorescence in situ hybridization.

    P. M. Nederlof;S. van der Flier;J. Wiegant;A. K. Raap

  • New strategy for multi-colour fluorescence in situ hybridisation: COBRA: COmbined Binary RAtio labelling.

    Tanke Hj;Wiegant J;van Gijlswijk Rp;Bezrookove

  • Three-color fluorescence in situ hybridization for the simultaneous detection of multiple nucleic acid sequences.

    P. M. Nederlof;D. Robinson;R. Abuknesha;J. Wiegant

  • In situ hybridization with fluoresceinated DNA

    Joop Wiegant;Thomas Ried;Petra M. Nederlof;Mels Van der Ploeg

  • Linear 2′ O-Methyl RNA probes for the visualization of RNA in living cells

    C. Molenaar;S. A. Marras;J. C. M. Slats;J.-C. Truffert

  • Direct visualization of dispersed 11q13 chromosomal translocations in mantle cell lymphoma by multicolor DNA fiber fluorescence in situ hybridization

    J.-W. Vaandrager;E.K Schuuring;E. Zwikstra;C. J. De Boer

  • High-resolution DNA Fiber-FISH for genomic DNA mapping and colour bar-coding of large genes

    R J Florijn;L A Bonden;H Vrolijk;J Wiegant

  • Characterization and chromosomal localization of the human proto-oncogene BMI-1

    Mark Alkema;Joop Wiegant;Anton K. Raap;Anton Bems

  • Multiple colors by fluorescence in situ hybridization using ratio-labelled DNA probes create a molecular karyotype

    J.G. Dauwerse;J. Wiegant;A.K. Raap;M.H. Breuning

  • The Glial and Mesenchymal Elements of Gliosarcomas Share Similar Genetic Alterations

    Rudolf H. Boerman;Kari Anderl;John Herath;Thomas Borell

  • Real‐time monitoring of rolling‐circle amplification using a modified molecular beacon design

    Mats Nilsson;Mats Gullberg;Fredrik Dahl;Karoly Szuhai

  • Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis Reveals Recurrent Chromosomal Alterations and Prognostic Parameters in Primary Cutaneous Large B-Cell Lymphoma

    Remco Dijkman;Cornelis P. Tensen;Ekaterina S. Jordanova;Jeroen Knijnenburg

  • Cancer-associated mutations in chromatin remodeler hSNF5 promote chromosomal instability by compromising the mitotic checkpoint

    Robert G.J. Vries;Vladimir Bezrookove;Lobke M.P. Zuijderduijn;Sima Kheradmand Kia

Frequent Co-Authors

Carla Rosenberg
Carla Rosenberg Universidade de São Paulo
Roeland W. Dirks
Roeland W. Dirks Leiden University Medical Center
Hans J. Tanke
Hans J. Tanke Leiden University Medical Center
Karoly Szuhai
Karoly Szuhai Leiden University Medical Center
Ed Schuuring
Ed Schuuring University Medical Center Groningen
Martijn H. Breuning
Martijn H. Breuning Leiden University Medical Center
Hanneke C. Kluin-Nelemans
Hanneke C. Kluin-Nelemans University Medical Center Groningen
Gert-Jan B. van Ommen
Gert-Jan B. van Ommen Leiden University Medical Center
Johan T. den Dunnen
Johan T. den Dunnen Leiden University Medical Center
Mats Nilsson
Mats Nilsson Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology can open doors to diverse and rewarding career paths. Online degrees have made it more convenient to pursue related fields, letting students balance studies with other commitments. Whether you’re interested in laboratory research, health services, or the psychological aspects of science, there are many online options to consider.

For those drawn to the human and community side of science, the online masters of social work equips graduates for impactful roles supporting public health and well-being. If you’re interested in mental health, a fast track masters in psychology can rapidly prepare you for careers in behavioral sciences or clinical settings.

Another popular choice is an accelerated online masters in counseling degree, ideal for those focused on mental health advocacy. For students intrigued by the intersection of science and law, a forensic psychology degree offers unique insight into criminal justice and investigative roles.

By considering these interdisciplinary pathways, Molecular Biology students can expand their expertise and discover new opportunities in both research and applied science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Anton K. Raap

Recently Published Articles