| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 44 | 4038 | 3727 | 1925 | 1744 | 195 | 12100 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Ann Forsyth between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ann Forsyth published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2017. 10 of the 226 publications appeared in the last two years.
226 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1986 | 1 |
| 1987 | 0 |
| 1988 | 0 |
| 1989 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1 |
| 1991 | 0 |
| 1992 | 2 |
| 1993 | 0 |
| 1994 | 1 |
| 1995 | 1 |
| 1996 | 0 |
| 1997 | 4 |
| 1998 | 2 |
| 1999 | 6 |
| 2000 | 2 |
| 2001 | 6 |
| 2002 | 3 |
| 2003 | 3 |
| 2004 | 1 |
| 2005 | 6 |
| 2006 | 9 |
| 2007 | 10 |
| 2008 | 5 |
| 2009 | 15 |
| 2010 | 13 |
| 2011 | 10 |
| 2012 | 9 |
| 2013 | 4 |
| 2014 | 7 |
| 2015 | 4 |
| 2016 | 12 |
| 2017 | 22 |
| 2018 | 4 |
| 2019 | 17 |
| 2020 | 8 |
| 2021 | 16 |
| 2022 | 7 |
| 2023 | 5 |
| 2024 | 2 |
| 2025 | 8 |
| Total | 226 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Forsyth sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 195 publications — 62nd percentile
62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 44–53 | 28 | |
| 54–63 | 61 | |
| 64–73 | 161 | |
| 74–83 | 225 | |
| 84–93 | 301 | |
| 94–103 | 390 | |
| 104–113 | 406 | |
| 114–123 | 474 | |
| 124–133 | 453 | |
| 134–143 | 434 | |
| 144–153 | 407 | |
| 154–163 | 411 | |
| 164–173 | 391 | |
| 174–183 | 313 | |
| 184–193 | 319 | |
| 194–203 | 304 | 195 |
| 204–213 | 285 | |
| 214–223 | 246 | |
| 224–233 | 213 | |
| 234–243 | 170 | |
| 244–253 | 167 | |
| 254–263 | 162 | |
| 264–273 | 138 | |
| 274–283 | 138 | |
| 284–293 | 113 | |
| 294–303 | 106 | |
| 304–313 | 95 | |
| 314–323 | 101 | |
| 324–333 | 81 | |
| 334–343 | 69 | |
| 344–353 | 56 | |
| 354–363 | 36 | |
| 364–373 | 42 | |
| 374–383 | 41 | |
| 384–393 | 44 | |
| 394–403 | 27 | |
| 404–413 | 30 | |
| 414–423 | 20 | |
| 424–433 | 29 | |
| 434–443 | 29 | |
| 444–453 | 25 | |
| 454–463 | 19 | |
| 464–473 | 21 | |
| 474–483 | 11 | |
| 484–493 | 17 | |
| 494–503 | 7 | |
| 504–513 | 6 | |
| 514–523 | 12 | |
| 524–533 | 10 | |
| 534–543 | 7 | |
| 544–553 | 6 | |
| 554–563 | 12 | |
| 564–569 | 8 | |
| 570+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Forsyth sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile
49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 177 | |
| 31 | 210 | |
| 32 | 222 | |
| 33 | 188 | |
| 34 | 181 | |
| 35 | 243 | |
| 36 | 261 | |
| 37 | 272 | |
| 38 | 278 | |
| 39 | 300 | |
| 40 | 297 | |
| 41 | 308 | |
| 42 | 313 | |
| 43 | 300 | |
| 44 | 269 | 44 |
| 45 | 260 | |
| 46 | 228 | |
| 47 | 251 | |
| 48 | 203 | |
| 49 | 186 | |
| 50 | 187 | |
| 51 | 166 | |
| 52 | 138 | |
| 53 | 141 | |
| 54 | 131 | |
| 55 | 137 | |
| 56 | 109 | |
| 57 | 129 | |
| 58 | 95 | |
| 59 | 105 | |
| 60 | 106 | |
| 61 | 86 | |
| 62 | 94 | |
| 63 | 77 | |
| 64 | 79 | |
| 65 | 59 | |
| 66 | 68 | |
| 67 | 51 | |
| 68 | 49 | |
| 69 | 40 | |
| 70 | 43 | |
| 71 | 40 | |
| 72 | 50 | |
| 73 | 46 | |
| 74 | 43 | |
| 75 | 45 | |
| 76 | 45 | |
| 77 | 30 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 31 | |
| 80 | 29 | |
| 81 | 18 | |
| 82 | 21 | |
| 83 | 26 | |
| 84 | 15 | |
| 85 | 15 | |
| 86 | 19 | |
| 87 | 19 | |
| 88 | 12 | |
| 89 | 7 | |
| 90 | 19 | |
| 91 | 20 | |
| 92 | 13 | |
| 93 | 9 | |
| 94 | 13 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 7 | |
| 97 | 6 | |
| 98 | 6 | |
| 99 | 6 | |
| 100+ | 97 |
Ann Forsyth is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and is primarily engaged in research within the social sciences. The focus of their work spans several subfields, including transportation, demography, health, urban studies, and toxicology. Their research topics notably encompass urban transport and accessibility, health disparities and outcomes, migration, aging, tourism studies, urban green space and health, scientometrics and bibliometrics research, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, as well as urban planning and governance.
Their publication record includes contributions to a range of academic journals, with a particular concentration in the Journal of the American Planning Association, where they have 18 publications. Other frequent venues include the Journal of Planning Literature, Housing Policy Debate, Nature Medicine, and the Journal of Urban Design.
Among Forsyth's recent scholarly works are:
Forsyth has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include Richard Peiser, Yingying Lyu, Jennifer Molinsky, Lynn van Olst, and Brooke Simonton. These collaborations cross various disciplines and reflect a networked approach to addressing urban and social issues.
Notable publication venues associated with Forsyth's work are:
The overarching thematic elements of Forsyth's research are situated at the intersection of urban environments, population aging, health equity, and planning policies. Their analysis covers the effects of the built environment on community health and aging populations, as well as methodological critiques related to neighborhood audit tools and spatial dynamics impacting social well-being.
Ross C. Brownson;Christine M. Hoehner;Kristen Day;Ann Forsyth
Ann Forsyth
Ann Forsyth;Mary Hearst;J. Michael Oakes;Kathryn H. Schmitz
Kristen Day;Marlon Boarnet;Mariela Alfonzo;Ann Forsyth
Ann Forsyth;J. Michael Oakes;Kathryn H. Schmitz;Mary Hearst
Leonie Sandercock;Ann Forsyth
Ann Forsyth
J Michael Oakes;Ann Forsyth;Kathryn H Schmitz
Ann Forsyth;J. Michael Oakes;Brian Lee;Kathryn H. Schmitz
Hilda Blanco;Marina Alberti;Ann Forsyth;Kevin J. Krizek
Melissa N. Laska;Mary O. Hearst;Ann Forsyth;Keryn Elizabeth Pasch
Kevin J Krizek;Susan L Handy;Ann Forsyth
Marlon G. Boarnet;Kristen Day;Mariela Alfonzo;Ann Forsyth
Ann Forsyth;Michael Southworth
Justin Jacobson;Ann Forsyth
Ann Forsyth;Kevin J Krizek
Ann Forsyth;Laura Musacchio;Frank Fitzgerald
Ann Forsyth;Kevin Krizek
Marlon G. Boarnet;Ann Forsyth;Kristen Day;J. Michael Oakes
Melanie M. Wall;Nicole I. Larson;Ann Forsyth;David C. Van Riper
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to flexible and affordable online study options. Those interested in psychology can benefit from online masters psychology programs, which offer specialization and career advancement at a lower cost.
For educators and professionals aiming to advance quickly, edd online degrees provide fast-track options to earn an advanced qualification without a lengthy commitment. These programs suit those looking to move into leadership, administrative, or academic roles.
Many students are now seeking online master degree programs that can be completed in as little as one year, helping graduates gain new credentials and enter the workforce faster. For those on a tighter timeline, accelerated online programs offer the chance to finish a bachelor's degree more quickly than traditional paths.
With these flexible online options, learners can match their education to their career goals, budgets, and lifestyles, making it easier than ever to achieve professional growth in the Social Sciences and Humanities.
Seoul National University
Central South University
University of Zaragoza
George Mason University
Stony Brook University
University of Utah
Yonsei University
University of Colorado Boulder
Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
University of Calgary
Bank of Greece
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
University of Melbourne
University of California, Santa Barbara
