World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
44
Citations
12100
World Ranking
4038
National Ranking
1925

Ann Forsyth publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Forsyth sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 195 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Ann Forsyth D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Forsyth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ann Forsyth is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and is primarily engaged in research within the social sciences. The focus of their work spans several subfields, including transportation, demography, health, urban studies, and toxicology. Their research topics notably encompass urban transport and accessibility, health disparities and outcomes, migration, aging, tourism studies, urban green space and health, scientometrics and bibliometrics research, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, as well as urban planning and governance.

Their publication record includes contributions to a range of academic journals, with a particular concentration in the Journal of the American Planning Association, where they have 18 publications. Other frequent venues include the Journal of Planning Literature, Housing Policy Debate, Nature Medicine, and the Journal of Urban Design.

Among Forsyth's recent scholarly works are:

  • What Is Aging in Place? Confusions and Contradictions (2020, Housing Policy Debate)
  • Lessons from planned resettlement and new town experiences for avoiding climate sprawl (2020, Landscape and Urban Planning)

Forsyth has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include Richard Peiser, Yingying Lyu, Jennifer Molinsky, Lynn van Olst, and Brooke Simonton. These collaborations cross various disciplines and reflect a networked approach to addressing urban and social issues.

Notable publication venues associated with Forsyth's work are:

  • Journal of the American Planning Association
  • Journal of Planning Literature
  • Housing Policy Debate
  • Nature Medicine
  • Journal of Urban Design

The overarching thematic elements of Forsyth's research are situated at the intersection of urban environments, population aging, health equity, and planning policies. Their analysis covers the effects of the built environment on community health and aging populations, as well as methodological critiques related to neighborhood audit tools and spatial dynamics impacting social well-being.

Best Publications

  • Measuring the Built Environment for Physical Activity: State of the Science

    Ross C. Brownson;Christine M. Hoehner;Kristen Day;Ann Forsyth

  • What is a Walkable Place? The Walkability Debate in Urban Design

    Ann Forsyth

  • Design and Destinations: Factors Influencing Walking and Total Physical Activity:

    Ann Forsyth;Mary Hearst;J. Michael Oakes;Kathryn H. Schmitz

  • The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure built environments: development.

    Kristen Day;Marlon Boarnet;Mariela Alfonzo;Ann Forsyth

  • Does Residential Density Increase Walking and Other Physical Activity

    Ann Forsyth;J. Michael Oakes;Kathryn H. Schmitz;Mary Hearst

  • A Gender Agenda: New Directions for Planning Theory

    Leonie Sandercock;Ann Forsyth

  • The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture:

    Ann Forsyth

  • The effects of neighborhood density and street connectivity on walking behavior: the Twin Cities walking study

    J Michael Oakes;Ann Forsyth;Kathryn H Schmitz

  • The built environment, walking, and physical activity: Is the environment more important to some people than others?

    Ann Forsyth;J. Michael Oakes;Brian Lee;Kathryn H. Schmitz

  • Hot, congested, crowded and diverse: Emerging research agendas in planning

    Hilda Blanco;Marina Alberti;Ann Forsyth;Kevin J. Krizek

  • Neighbourhood food environments: are they associated with adolescent dietary intake, food purchases and weight status?

    Melissa N. Laska;Mary O. Hearst;Ann Forsyth;Keryn Elizabeth Pasch

  • Explaining Changes in Walking and Bicycling Behavior: Challenges for Transportation Research

    Kevin J Krizek;Susan L Handy;Ann Forsyth

  • The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure built environments: reliability tests.

    Marlon G. Boarnet;Kristen Day;Mariela Alfonzo;Ann Forsyth

  • Cities Afoot—Pedestrians, Walkability and Urban Design

    Ann Forsyth;Michael Southworth

  • Seven American TODs: Good practices for urban design in Transit-Oriented Development projects

    Justin Jacobson;Ann Forsyth

  • Promoting walking and bicycling: assessing the evidence to assist planners

    Ann Forsyth;Kevin J Krizek

  • Designing Small Parks: A Manual for Addressing Social and Ecological Concerns

    Ann Forsyth;Laura Musacchio;Frank Fitzgerald

  • Urban Design: Is there a Distinctive View from the Bicycle?

    Ann Forsyth;Kevin Krizek

  • The street level built environment and physical activity and walking: Results of a predictive validity study for the irvine minnesota inventory

    Marlon G. Boarnet;Ann Forsyth;Kristen Day;J. Michael Oakes

  • Patterns of Obesogenic Neighborhood Features and Adolescent Weight: A comparison of statistical approaches

    Melanie M. Wall;Nicole I. Larson;Ann Forsyth;David C. Van Riper

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin J. Krizek
Kevin J. Krizek University of Colorado Boulder
J. Michael Oakes
J. Michael Oakes University of Minnesota
Kathryn H. Schmitz
Kathryn H. Schmitz Pennsylvania State University
Leslie A. Lytle
Leslie A. Lytle University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Dianne Neumark-Sztainer University of Minnesota
Melanie M. Wall
Melanie M. Wall Columbia University
Marlon G. Boarnet
Marlon G. Boarnet University of Southern California
John R. Sirard
John R. Sirard University of Massachusetts Amherst
Daniel A. Rodriguez
Daniel A. Rodriguez University of California, Berkeley
Mary Story
Mary Story Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to flexible and affordable online study options. Those interested in psychology can benefit from online masters psychology programs, which offer specialization and career advancement at a lower cost.

For educators and professionals aiming to advance quickly, edd online degrees provide fast-track options to earn an advanced qualification without a lengthy commitment. These programs suit those looking to move into leadership, administrative, or academic roles.

Many students are now seeking online master degree programs that can be completed in as little as one year, helping graduates gain new credentials and enter the workforce faster. For those on a tighter timeline, accelerated online programs offer the chance to finish a bachelor's degree more quickly than traditional paths.

With these flexible online options, learners can match their education to their career goals, budgets, and lifestyles, making it easier than ever to achieve professional growth in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Ann Forsyth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles