World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
111
Citations
48333
World Ranking
188
National Ranking
10

Andrew J. Tatem publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Tatem sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 372 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Andrew J. Tatem D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Tatem sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Andrew J. Tatem is affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, with primary focus on Social Sciences and Medicine. Within these broad fields, their work concentrates on subfields including Transportation, Modeling and Simulation, Global and Planetary Change, Epidemiology, and Health.

Their main research topics cover a range of critical areas: COVID-19 epidemiological studies, Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis, Impact of Light on Environment and Health, Data-Driven Disease Surveillance, Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy, Global Maternal and Child Health, and Urban Transport and Accessibility.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Andrew J. Tatem include Shengjie Lai, Nick Ruktanonchai, C. Edson Utazi, Corrine W. Ruktanonchai, and Maksym Bondarenko.

Their recent notable publications include:

  • Infectious disease in an era of global change, 2021, Nature Reviews Microbiology
  • Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain COVID-19 in China, 2020, Nature
  • Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Transmission in Train Passengers: an Epidemiological and Modeling Study, 2020, Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions for containing the COVID-19 outbreak in China, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Assessing the impact of coordinated COVID-19 exit strategies across Europe, 2020, Science

Andrew J. Tatem frequently publishes in venues such as ePrints Soton (University of Southampton), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Preprints.org, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, and Remote Sensing.

They have been recognized as a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • The global distribution and population at risk of malaria: past, present, and future

    Simon I Hay;Carlos A Guerra;Andrew J Tatem;Abdisalan M Noor

  • Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities

    Regan Early;Bethany A. Bradley;Jeffrey S. Dukes;Joshua J. Lawler

  • Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain COVID-19 in China.

    Shengjie Lai;Shengjie Lai;Nick W. Ruktanonchai;Nick W. Ruktanonchai;Liangcai Zhou;Olivia Prosper

  • Past and future spread of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus.

    Moritz U. G. Kraemer;Moritz U. G. Kraemer;Moritz U. G. Kraemer;Robert C. Reiner;Oliver J. Brady;Jane P. Messina

  • Quantifying the impact of human mobility on malaria.

    Amy Wesolowski;Nathan Eagle;Nathan Eagle;Andrew J. Tatem;Andrew J. Tatem;David L. Smith;David L. Smith

  • Disaggregating census data for population mapping using Random forests with remotely-sensed and ancillary data

    Forrest F.R. Stevens;Andrea A.E. Gaughan;Catherine Linard;Andrew J Tatem

  • Dynamic population mapping using mobile phone data

    Pierre Deville;Catherine Linard;Samuel Martin;Marius Gilbert

  • WorldPop, open data for spatial demography

    Andrew J. Tatem

  • The early spread and epidemic ignition of HIV-1 in human populations

    Nuno Rodrigues Faria;Andrew Rambaut;Marc A Suchard;Guy Baele

  • Urbanization, malaria transmission and disease burden in Africa

    Simon I. Hay;Carlos A. Guerra;Andrew J. Tatem;Peter M. Atkinson

  • Global traffic and disease vector dispersal

    Andrew J. Tatem;Simon I. Hay;David J. Rogers

  • Population Distribution, Settlement Patterns and Accessibility across Africa in 2010.

    Catherine Linard;Catherine Linard;Marius Gilbert;Robert W. Snow;Abdisalan M. Noor

  • A long neglected world malaria map: Plasmodium vivax endemicity in 2010.

    Peter W. Gething;Iqbal R. F. Elyazar;Catherine L. Moyes;David L. Smith;David L. Smith

  • The limits and intensity of Plasmodium falciparum transmission: implications for malaria control and elimination worldwide

    Carlos A Guerra;Priscilla W Gikandi;Andrew J Tatem;Abdisalan M Noor;Abdisalan M Noor

  • The international limits and population at risk of Plasmodium vivax transmission in 2009

    Carlos A. Guerra;Rosalind E. Howes;Anand P. Patil;Peter W. Gething

  • Estimating the Global Clinical Burden of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria in 2007

    Simon I. Hay;Emelda A. Okiro;Peter W. Gething;Anand P. Patil

  • Super-resolution target identification from remotely sensed images using a Hopfield neural network

    A.J. Tatem;H.G. Lewis;P.M. Atkinson;M.S. Nixon

  • A new urban landscape in East?Southeast Asia, 2000?2010

    A. Schneider;C. M. Mertes;A. J. Tatem;A. J. Tatem;B. Tan

  • A systematic review of mathematical models of mosquito-borne pathogen transmission: 1970–2010

    Robert C Reiner;Robert C Reiner;T Alex Perkins;T Alex Perkins;Christopher M Barker;Christopher M Barker;Tianchan Niu;Tianchan Niu

  • Mapping the zoonotic niche of Ebola virus disease in Africa

    David M. Pigott;Nick Golding;Adrian Mylne;Zhi Huang

  • Mapping global environmental suitability for Zika virus

    Jane P. Messina;Moritz Ug G. Kraemer;Oliver J. Brady;David M. Pigott;David M. Pigott

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon I. Hay
Simon I. Hay University of Washington
David L. Smith
David L. Smith University of Washington
Robert W. Snow
Robert W. Snow Kenya Medical Research Institute
Peter W. Gething
Peter W. Gething Telethon Kids Institute
Peter M. Atkinson
Peter M. Atkinson Lancaster University
Abdisalan M. Noor
Abdisalan M. Noor World Health Organization
Moritz U G Kraemer
Moritz U G Kraemer University of Oxford
Bryan T. Grenfell
Bryan T. Grenfell Princeton University
C. Jessica E. Metcalf
C. Jessica E. Metcalf Princeton University
Zoe Matthews
Zoe Matthews University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, several online degree options offer flexible pathways to advanced careers. Many professionals pursue an online EdD programs no dissertation to accelerate their credentials without the traditional dissertation hurdle. This approach is ideal for working professionals seeking leadership roles in education or sustainability-focused organizations.

Additionally, those holding an Education Specialist (EdS) degree can explore EdS to EdD programs online, which provide a smooth transition to doctoral-level study. These programs emphasize applied research and policy development, crucial for advancing environmental education initiatives.

For careers centered around community advocacy and social work within environmental contexts, DSW programs offer specialized training in leadership and advanced practice. These programs support roles in mental health, policy, and social justice arenas related to environmental concerns.

Finally, those seeking flexible foundational studies may consider an accredited affordable online general studies degree. This can serve as a stepping stone to specialized environmental or interdisciplinary graduate programs, accommodating diverse interests and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew J. Tatem

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles