World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
35
Citations
4052
World Ranking
7439
National Ranking
30

Andrea C. Premoli publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea C. Premoli sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 113 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Andrea C. Premoli D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea C. Premoli sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrea C. Premoli is affiliated with the National University of Comahue in Argentina. Their research spans several fields within environmental and biological sciences, focusing primarily on the dynamics and interactions of plant species within ecological and climatic contexts.

The main fields of study for Premoli include Environmental Science, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work further delves into subfields such as Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Genetics, and Atmospheric Science.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Genetic Diversity and Population Structure, Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions, Tree-Ring Climate Responses, Plant and Animal Studies, and Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics.

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Premoli are:

  • Individual-based dendrogenomic analysis of forest dieback driven by extreme droughts (2020, Canadian Journal of Forest Research)
  • Subtle precipitation differences yield adaptive adjustments in the mesic Nothofagus dombeyi (2020, Forest Ecology and Management)
  • Niche dynamics in amphitropical desert disjunct plants: Seeking for ecological and species-specific influences (2020, Global Ecology and Biogeography)
  • Tree-Ring Analysis and Genetic Associations Help to Understand Drought Sensitivity in the Chilean Endemic Forest of Nothofagus macrocarpa (2022, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change)
  • Increased canopy seed-storage in post-fire pine invaders suggests rapid selection mediated by fire (2020, Basic and Applied Ecology)

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Paula Mathiasen (11 collaborations)
  • María Paula Quiroga (6 collaborations)
  • Cintia P. Souto (5 collaborations)
  • Dayana G. Díaz (5 collaborations)
  • Federico Sottotetti (4 collaborations)

Premoli's work appears regularly in several publication venues. The most frequent include Forest Ecology and Management, Drugs in Context, New Forests, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, and Research Square.

Best Publications

  • Evidence of chloroplast capture in South American Nothofagus (subgenus Nothofagus, Nothofagaceae).

    M. Cristina Acosta;Andrea C. Premoli

  • Genetic variation in Fitzroya cupressoides (alerce), a threatened South American conifer.

    T. R. Allnutt;A. C. Newton;A. Lara;A. Premoli

  • Isozyme variation and recent biogeographical history of the long-lived conifer Fitzroya cupressoides

    A. C. Premoli;T. Kitzberger;T. T. Veblen

  • Genetic variation in the vulnerable and endemic Monkey Puzzle tree, detected using RAPDs

    Sarah A Bekessy;Sarah A Bekessy;T R Allnutt;T R Allnutt;A C Premoli;A Lara

  • Genetic variation in the threatened South American conifer Pilgerodendron uviferum (Cupressaceae), detected using RAPD markers

    T.R Allnutt;A.C Newton;A Premoli;A Lara

  • Out in the cold: genetic variation of Nothofagus pumilio (Nothofagaceae) provides evidence for latitudinally distinct evolutionary histories in austral South America

    Paula Mathiasen;Andrea C. Premoli

  • Phylogeographically concordant chloroplast DNA divergence in sympatric Nothofagus s.s. How deep can it be

    Andrea C. Premoli;Paula Mathiasen;M. Cristina Acosta;Victor A. Ramos

  • Isozyme Polymorphisms Provide Evidence of Clinal Variation With Elevation in Nothofagus pumilio

    A. C. Premoli

  • Environmental v. genetically driven variation in ecophysiological traits of Nothofagus pumilio from contrasting elevations

    Andrea C. Premoli;Carol A. Brewer

  • Southern-most Nothofagus trees enduring ice ages: genetic evidence and ecological niche retrodiction reveal high latitude (54°S) glacial refugia.

    Andrea C. Premoli;Paula Mathiasen;Thomas Kitzberger

  • Regeneration mode affects spatial genetic structure of Nothofagus dombeyi forests.

    Andrea C. Premoli;Thomas Kitzberger

  • Morphological and phenological differences in Nothofagus pumilio from contrasting elevations: Evidence from a common garden

    Andrea C. Premoli;Estela Raffaele;Paula Mathiasen

  • Patterns of isozyme variation as indicators of biogeographic history in Pilgerodendron uviferum (D. Don) Florín

    A. C. Premoli;C. P. Souto;A. E. Rovere;T. R. Allnut

  • Effects of population disjunction on isozyme variation in the widespread Pilgerodendron uviferum

    A C Premoli;C P Souto;T R Allnutt;A C Newton

  • Genetic variation in a geographically restricted and two widespread species of South American Nothofagus

    Andrea Premoli

  • Refining predictions of population decline at species' rear edges

    Albert Vilà-Cabrera;Andrea C Premoli;Alistair S Jump

  • Genetic patterns in Podocarpus parlatorei reveal the long‐term persistence of cold‐tolerant elements in the southern Yungas

    M. Paula Quiroga;Andrea C. Premoli

  • Genetic Structure and Early Effects of Inbreeding in Fragmented Temperate Forests of a Self-Incompatible Tree, Embothrium Coccineum

    Paula Mathiasen;Adriana E. Rovere;Andrea C. Premoli

  • Molecular and fossil evidence disentangle the biogeographical history of Podocarpus, a key genus in plant geography

    María Paula Quiroga;María Paula Quiroga;Paula Mathiasen;Paula Mathiasen;Ari Iglesias;Robert R. Mill

  • Variación intraespecífica en especies arbóreas de los bosques templados de Chile y Argentina

    Chile. Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica;Claudio Donoso Zegers;Leonardo A. Gallo

  • Leaf architecture of South American Nothofagus (Nothofagaceae) using traditional and new methods in morphometrics

    Andrea C. Premoli

  • Toward integrated analysis of human impacts on forest biodiversity: lessons from Latin America.

    Adrian C. Newton;Luis Cayuela;Cristian Echeverría;Juan J. Armesto

  • Forest landscape restoration in the drylands of Latin America

    Adrian C. Newton;Rafael F. del Castillo;Cristian Echeverría;Davide Geneletti;Davide Geneletti

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrian C. Newton
Adrian C. Newton James Hutton Institute
Thomas Kitzberger
Thomas Kitzberger National University of Comahue
Antonio Lara
Antonio Lara Austral University of Chile
Juan J. Armesto
Juan J. Armesto Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Sarah A. Bekessy
Sarah A. Bekessy RMIT University
Yan B. Linhart
Yan B. Linhart University of Colorado Boulder
Davide Geneletti
Davide Geneletti University of Trento
Thomas T. Veblen
Thomas T. Veblen University of Colorado Boulder
José María Rey Benayas
José María Rey Benayas University of Alcalá
Guadalupe Williams-Linera
Guadalupe Williams-Linera Instituto de Ecología

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA often intersects with various fields, opening up diverse academic and career options. Many students interested in environmental research, design, or analysis may benefit from pursuing complementary online degrees.

For example, students drawn to sustainable design and environmental planning might explore naab-accredited online architecture degrees. These programs provide specialized knowledge that integrates ecological principles with urban and landscape design.

A strong foundation in quantitative skills is also valuable. Obtaining a bsc mathematics online can boost data analysis abilities, which are vital in ecological modeling and evolutionary simulations.

Communication and visualization skills are essential in raising awareness and presenting scientific findings. The best online graphic design degree programs empower students to create impactful infographics and reports for scientific and public audiences.

For those seeking a broader approach, an online interdisciplinary studies degree career outcomes pathway can be tailored to combine ecology with policy, education, or public health. This flexibility can enhance employability across multiple sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Andrea C. Premoli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles