World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 31 11242 10519 5870 5357 75 3030

David Córdova publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Córdova between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Córdova published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2017. 5 of the 94 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2017. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
2005 2025

94 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Córdova: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 1
2009 2
2010 2
2011 3
2012 4
2013 5
2014 9
2015 9
2016 8
2017 10
2018 6
2019 5
2020 7
2021 6
2022 3
2023 5
2024 3
2025 2
Total 94
Download as CSV

David Córdova publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Córdova sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 75 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 75
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

David Córdova D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Córdova sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30–31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398 31
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David Córdova is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, including health professions, medicine, and psychology. They focus primarily on general health professions and clinical psychology, with notable contributions also to sociology and political science, infectious diseases, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

Their scholarship addresses key topics such as adolescent sexual and reproductive health, HIV/AIDS research and interventions, mobile health and mHealth applications, racial and ethnic identity research, migration, health and trauma, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and substance abuse treatment and outcomes.

David Córdova has published in several prominent academic venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Adolescent Health
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
  • Behavioral Medicine
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Córdova include:

  • "Depressive Symptoms and Resilience among Hispanic Emerging Adults: Examining the Moderating Effects of Mindfulness, Distress Tolerance, Emotion Regulation, Family Cohesion, and Social Support" (2020, Behavioral Medicine)
  • "Pilot Study of a Multilevel Mobile Health App for Substance Use, Sexual Risk Behaviors, and Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections and HIV Among Youth: Randomized Controlled Trial" (2020, JMIR mhealth and uhealth)
  • "Disentangling relationships between bicultural stress and mental well-being among Latinx immigrant adolescents." (2020, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology)
  • "Family functioning within the context of families with adolescent children in urban India" (2022, Family Process)
  • "Efficacy of a Digital Health Preventive Intervention for Adolescents With HIV or Sexually Transmitted Infections and Substance Use Disorder: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial" (2023, JMIR Research Protocols)

Their network of frequent co-authors includes:

  • Sydni Warner
  • Christopher P. Salas-Wright
  • Frania Mendoza Lua
  • Jorge Delva
  • José A. Bauermeister

Best Publications

  • Trajectories of Cultural Stressors and Effects on Mental Health and Substance Use Among Hispanic Immigrant Adolescents

    Seth J. Schwartz;Jennifer B. Unger;Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati;Byron L. Zamboanga

  • Intergroup and Within-Group Perceived Discrimination among U.S.-Born and Foreign-Born Latino Youth.

    David Cordova;Richard C. Cervantes

  • "Queremos aprender": Latino immigrants' call to integrate cultural adaptation with best practice knowledge in a parenting intervention.

    José Parra Cardona;Kendal Holtrop;David Córdova;Ana Rocio Escobar-Chew

  • Developmental Trajectories of Acculturation: Links With Family Functioning and Mental Health in Recent-Immigrant Hispanic Adolescents

    Seth J. Schwartz;Jennifer B. Unger;Byron L. Zamboanga;David Córdova

  • Substance use disorders among first- and second- generation immigrant adults in the United States: evidence of an immigrant paradox?

    Christopher P Salas-Wright;Michael G Vaughn;Trenette T Clark;Lauren D Terzis

  • The efficacy of Familias Unidas on drug and alcohol outcomes for Hispanic delinquent youth: Main effects and interaction effects by parental stress and social support

    Guillermo Prado;David Córdova;Sunan Huang;Yannine Estrada

  • Effects of a Family Intervention in Reducing HIV Risk Behaviors Among High-Risk Hispanic Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Guillermo Prado;Hilda Pantin;Shi Huang;David Cordova

  • Shared ancestry, evolving stories: similar and contrasting life experiences described by foreign born and U.S. born Latino parents.

    José Rubén Parra-Cardona;David CÓrdova;Kendal Holtrop;Francisco A. Villarruel

  • Life experiences of hispanic adolescents: developmental and language considerations in acculturation stress

    Richard C. Cervantes;David Cordova

  • An “immigrant paradox” for adolescent externalizing behavior? Evidence from a national sample

    Christopher P. Salas-Wright;Michael G. Vaughn;Seth J. Schwartz;David Córdova

  • Trends in the disapproval and use of marijuana among adolescents and young adults in the United States: 2002–2013

    Christopher P. Salas-Wright;Michael G. Vaughn;Jelena Todic;David Córdova

  • The Hispanic Stress Inventory-Adolescent Version: A culturally informed psychosocial assessment

    Richard C. Cervantes;Dennis G. Fisher;David Córdova Jr.;Lucy E. Napper

  • Profiles of acculturation among Hispanics in the United States: links with discrimination and substance use

    Christopher P. Salas-Wright;Trenette T. Clark;Michael G. Vaughn;David Córdova

  • Predicting Condom Use Attitudes, Norms, and Control Beliefs in Hispanic Problem Behavior Youth: The Effects of Family Functioning and Parent–Adolescent Communication About Sex on Condom Use

    Shandey Malcolm;Shi Huang;David Cordova;Derek Freitas

  • Testing the Parent-Adolescent Acculturation Discrepancy Hypothesis: A Five-Wave Longitudinal Study.

    Seth J. Schwartz;Jennifer B. Unger;Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati;Byron L. Zamboanga

  • Substance use disorders among immigrants in the United States: A research update

    Christopher P. Salas-Wright;Michael G. Vaughn;Trenette T. Clark Goings;David Córdova

  • The Usability and Acceptability of an Adolescent mHealth HIV/STI and Drug Abuse Preventive Intervention in Primary Care

    David Cordova;Francheska Alers-Rojas;Frania Mendoza Lua;Jose Bauermeister

  • Toward a Typology of Acculturative Stress Results Among Hispanic Immigrants in the United States

    Christopher P. Salas-Wright;Eden H. Robles;Michael G. Vaughn;David Córdova

  • Bicultural stress, identity formation, and alcohol expectancies and misuse in Hispanic adolescents: a developmental approach.

    Assaf Oshri;Seth J. Schwartz;Jennifer B. Unger;Josephine A. Kwon

  • Health risk behaviors and depressive symptoms among Hispanic adolescents: Examining acculturation discrepancies and family functioning.

    Miguel Ángel Cano;Seth J. Schwartz;Linda G. Castillo;Jennifer B. Unger

  • A Community-Engaged Approach to Developing an mHealth HIV/STI and Drug Abuse Preventive Intervention for Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.

    Cordova D;Bauermeister Ja;Fessler K;Delva J

Frequent Co-Authors

Seth J. Schwartz
Seth J. Schwartz The University of Texas at Austin
Jennifer B. Unger
Jennifer B. Unger University of Southern California
Daniel W. Soto
Daniel W. Soto University of Southern California
Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati
Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati University of Southern California
Michael G. Vaughn
Michael G. Vaughn Saint Louis University
Guillermo Prado
Guillermo Prado University of Miami
José Szapocznik
José Szapocznik University of Miami
Miguel Ángel Cano
Miguel Ángel Cano The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Byron L. Zamboanga
Byron L. Zamboanga University of Arkansas at Fayetteville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options in psychology opens diverse career pathways, including roles in counseling, human resources, research, and mental health services. Today, many universities offer flexible distance programs, allowing students to balance work and life commitments while pursuing their degrees. Accredited institutions across the country have developed robust online curricula, ensuring that students can gain foundational knowledge and practical skills from anywhere.

Choosing the right program is essential. For instance, Florida offers a range of options as highlighted by the top psychology degrees in Florida. Similarly, you can explore the best psychology degree programs ranking in Georgia for more choices in the Southeast. For those interested in specific regional strengths, the best psychology program rankings in Grand Forks and the top psychology degrees in Grand Rapids provide helpful insights into local opportunities and standout institutions.

By studying psychology online, students can prepare for a variety of career paths and specializations, unlocking opportunities in a fast-growing field with high societal impact.

Best Scientists Citing David Córdova

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles