World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
59
Citations
9497
World Ranking
2479
National Ranking
295

Anjali Goswami publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anjali Goswami sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 164 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Anjali Goswami D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anjali Goswami sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anjali Goswami is affiliated with the Natural History Museum in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Mathematics, with a notable focus on Paleontology and Geometry and Topology as significant subfields.

The scientist's work covers a broad range of topics within evolutionary and paleontological studies. Key research themes include:

  • Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Publication venues where Anjali Goswami frequently contributes include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
  • Evolution
  • Evolution & Development

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts include Ryan N. Felice, Roberto Portela Miguez, Vincent Fernández, Anne-Claire Fabre, and Julien Clavel.

Examples of recent published papers showcasing a range of topics and collaboration include:

  • "The evolution of mammalian brain size," published in 2021 in Science Advances
  • "Change Detection in Remote Sensing Image Data Comparing Algebraic and Machine Learning Methods," published in 2022 in Electronics
  • "What does modularity mean?," published in 2021 in Evolution & Development
  • "Disparities in the analysis of morphological disparity," published in 2020 in Biology Letters
  • "Metamorphosis shapes cranial diversity and rate of evolution in salamanders," published in 2020 in Nature Ecology & Evolution

Best Publications

  • The macroevolutionary consequences of phenotypic integration: from development to deep time.

    A. Goswami;J. B. Smaers;J. B. Smaers;C. Soligo;P. D. Polly

  • The latitudinal biodiversity gradient through deep time

    Philip D. Mannion;Paul Upchurch;Roger B.J. Benson;Anjali Goswami

  • Cranial modularity shifts during mammalian evolution.

    Anjali Goswami

  • Developmental origins of mosaic evolution in the avian cranium.

    Ryan N. Felice;Ryan N. Felice;Anjali Goswami;Anjali Goswami

  • The influence of modularity on cranial morphological disparity in Carnivora and Primates (Mammalia).

    Anjali Goswami;P. David Polly

  • MORPHOLOGICAL INTEGRATION IN THE CARNIVORAN SKULL

    Anjali Goswami

  • Phylogenetic Principal Components Analysis and Geometric Morphometrics

    P. David Polly;A. Michelle Lawing;Anne-Claire Fabre;Anjali Goswami

  • Open data and digital morphology

    Thomas G. Davies;Imran A. Rahman;Stephan Lautenschlager;Stephan Lautenschlager;John A. Cunningham

  • Methods for Studying Morphological Integration and Modularity

    Anjali Goswami;P. David Polly

  • Biting through constraints: cranial morphology, disparity and convergence across living and fossil carnivorous mammals

    Anjali Goswami;Nick Milne;Stephen Wroe

  • A fly in a tube: Macroevolutionary expectations for integrated phenotypes.

    Ryan N. Felice;Ryan N. Felice;Marcela Randau;Marcela Randau;Anjali Goswami;Anjali Goswami

  • Ecomorphological diversification in squamates from conserved pattern of cranial integration.

    Akinobu Watanabe;Anne-Claire Fabre;Ryan N. Felice;Ryan N. Felice;Jessica A. Maisano

  • The evolution of mammalian brain size

    J. B. Smaers;J. B. Smaers;R. S. Rothman;D. R. Hudson;A. M. Balanoff;A. M. Balanoff

  • OSSIFICATION HETEROCHRONY IN THE THERIAN POSTCRANIAL SKELETON AND THE MARSUPIAL–PLACENTAL DICHOTOMY

    Vera Weisbecker;Anjali Goswami;Stephen Wroe;Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra

  • Brain size, life history, and metabolism at the marsupial/placental dichotomy

    Vera Weisbecker;Anjali Goswami

  • Skeletal development in sloths and the evolution of mammalian vertebral patterning

    Lionel Hautier;Vera Weisbecker;Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra;Anjali Goswami

  • Isotopic records from early whales and sea cows: contrasting patterns of ecological transition

    Mark T. Clementz;Anjali Goswami;Philip D. Gingerich;Paul L. Koch

  • A practical guide to sliding and surface semilandmarks in morphometric analyses

    C Bardua;R N Felice;A Watanabe;A Watanabe;A C Fabre

  • Cranial modularity and sequence heterochrony in mammals.

    Anjali Goswami

  • A radiation of arboreal basal eutherian mammals beginning in the Late Cretaceous of India

    Anjali Goswami;Guntupalli V. R. Prasad;Paul Upchurch;Doug M. Boyer

  • Dietary niche and the evolution of cranial morphology in birds.

    Ryan N Felice;Joseph A Tobias;Alex L Pigot;Anjali Goswami;Anjali Goswami

  • The correlated evolution of Runx2 tandem repeats, transcriptional activity, and facial length in carnivora.

    Karen Sears;A. Goswami;J. J. Flynn;L. A. Niswander

  • The macroevolutionary consequences of phenotypic integration: from development to deep time

    A Goswami

Frequent Co-Authors

John R. Hutchinson
John R. Hutchinson Royal Veterinary College
John J. Flynn
John J. Flynn American Museum of Natural History
Paul Upchurch
Paul Upchurch University College London
Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra
Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra University of Zurich
Roger B. J. Benson
Roger B. J. Benson University of Oxford
Doug M. Boyer
Doug M. Boyer Duke University
Stephen Wroe
Stephen Wroe University of New England
Nicolas Espurt
Nicolas Espurt Aix-Marseille University
Philip D. Mannion
Philip D. Mannion University College London
Patrice Baby
Patrice Baby Paul Sabatier University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their expertise in Ecology and Evolution, exploring online nursing and healthcare degrees can offer similar flexibility and career-focused training. Many students in science fields are choosing accelerated options to quickly move into impactful roles. For example, accelerated bsn programs allow you to leverage prior credits and gain a bachelor’s degree in nursing in as little as six months.

Professionals who already hold an associate degree might consider adn to np programs online for a more direct path to advanced nursing specialties, which can complement a background in biology or environmental science. For non-nurses, msn direct entry programs online provide an opportunity to switch careers swiftly and enter a growing healthcare workforce.

When comparing institutions, students often evaluate options such as capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn to find the right fit in terms of flexibility, accreditation, and support. Exploring these online programs expands your career possibilities, whether you want to combine scientific knowledge with direct patient care or contribute to public health and research.

Best Scientists Citing Anjali Goswami

Trending Scientists