World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 39 8460 8122 381 377 125 4711

Agnès Borbon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Agnès Borbon between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Agnès Borbon published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2016. 26 of the 155 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2016. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 13 publications
2001 2025

155 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Agnès Borbon: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 1
2003 2
2004 2
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 4
2009 3
2010 5
2011 8
2012 6
2013 7
2014 8
2015 11
2016 15
2017 9
2018 8
2019 7
2020 6
2021 2
2022 9
2023 14
2024 13
2025 13
Total 155
Download as CSV

Agnès Borbon publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnès Borbon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 125 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 125
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Agnès Borbon D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnès Borbon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275 39
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Agnès Borbon is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research activity focuses primarily on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a significant specialization in atmospheric science.

The scientist's work intersects multiple key topics including atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, air quality and health impacts, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, vehicle emissions and performance, atmospheric ozone and climate, air quality monitoring and forecasting, and plant responses to elevated CO2.

Frequent publication venues for Borbon's research include:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Atmosphere

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Agnès Borbon are:

  • "Cézeaux-Aulnat-Opme-Puy De Dôme: a multi-site for the long-term survey of the tropospheric composition and climate change" (2020), Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • "Anthropogenic and biogenic hydrophobic VOCs detected in clouds at the puy de Dôme station using Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction: Deviation from the Henry's law prediction" (2020), Atmospheric Research
  • "One decade of VOCs measurements in São Paulo megacity: Composition, variability, and emission evaluation in a biofuel usage context" (2020), The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Ubiquity of Anthropogenic Terpenoids in Cities Worldwide: Emission Ratios, Emission Quantification and Implications for Urban Atmospheric Chemistry" (2023), Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds during the OCTAVE Campaign: Sources and Distributions of Formaldehyde on Reunion Island" (2020), Atmosphere

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Borbon's scientific activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Pamela Dominutti
  • Aurélie Colomb
  • Manon Rocco
  • Charbel Afif
  • Adalgiza Fornaro

Within the broader framework of environmental science, the research contributions by Agnès Borbon cover various subfields:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Automotive Engineering
  • Environmental Engineering

This scientific profile reflects a consistent engagement in assessing atmospheric phenomena related to air quality, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and climate-relevant chemical processes. Their publication record shows involvement in both observational campaigns and analytical evaluations pertinent to urban and regional atmospheric chemistry.

Best Publications

  • An investigation into the traffic-related fraction of isoprene at an urban location

    Agnès Borbon;Hervé Fontaine;Marc Veillerot;Nadine Locoge

  • Intermediate-Volatility Organic Compounds: A Large Source of Secondary Organic Aerosol

    Yunliang Zhao;Christopher J. Hennigan;Andrew A. May;Daniel S. Tkacik

  • Emission ratios of anthropogenic volatile organic compounds in northern mid‐latitude megacities: Observations versus emission inventories in Los Angeles and Paris

    Agnes Borbon;Agnes Borbon;Agnes Borbon;J. B. Gilman;J. B. Gilman;W. C. Kuster;W. C. Kuster;N. Grand

  • Characterisation of NMHCs in a French urban atmosphere: overview of the main sources.

    A. Borbon;N. Locoge;M. Veillerot;J.C. Galloo

  • Radical budget analysis in a suburban European site during the MEGAPOLI summer field campaign

    Vincent Michoud;Alexandre Kukui;Alexandre Kukui;M. Camredon;Aurélie Colomb

  • Volatile and intermediate volatility organic compounds in suburban Paris: Variability, origin and importance for SOA formation

    Warda Ait-Helal;Warda Ait-Helal;Warda Ait-Helal;Agnès Borbon;Stéphane Sauvage;Stéphane Sauvage;J. A. de Gouw;J. A. de Gouw

  • Study of the unknown HONO daytime source at a European suburban site during the MEGAPOLI summer and winter field campaigns

    Vincent Michoud;Aurélie Colomb;Agnès Borbon;K. Miet

  • Aerosol particle measurements at three stationary sites in the megacity of Paris during summer 2009: meteorology and air mass origin dominate aerosol particle composition and size distribution

    Friederike Freutel;Jodi Schneider;F. Drewnick;S.-L. von der Weiden-Reinmüller

  • In situ, satellite measurement and model evidence on the dominant regional contribution to fine particulate matter levels in the Paris megacity

    M. Beekmann;A. S. H. Prévôt;F. Drewnick;J. Sciare;J. Sciare

  • Characterization of a Newly Developed Aircraft-Based Laser Ablation Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (ALABAMA) and First Field Deployment in Urban Pollution Plumes over Paris During MEGAPOLI 2009

    M. Brands;M. Kamphus;T. Böttger;J. Schneider

  • Analysis of long-term observations of NO x and CO in megacities and application to constraining emissions inventories

    Birgit Hassler;Birgit Hassler;Brian C. McDonald;Brian C. McDonald;Gregory J. Frost;Agnes Borbon

  • Formation of organic aerosol in the Paris region during the MEGAPOLI summer campaign: evaluation of the volatility-basis-set approach within the CHIMERE model

    Q. J. Zhang;M. Beekmann;F. Drewnick;F. Freutel

  • Chemical and aerosol characterisation of the troposphere over West Africa during the monsoon period as part of AMMA

    C. E. Reeves;P. Formenti;Charbel Afif;Charbel Afif;Gérard Ancellet

  • An automated monitoring system for VOC ozone precursors in ambient air: development, implementation and data analysis.

    C. Badol;A. Borbon;N. Locoge;T. Léonardis

  • Increasing atmospheric burden of ethanol in the United States

    J. A. de Gouw;J. A. de Gouw;J. B. Gilman;J. B. Gilman;A. Borbon;A. Borbon;A. Borbon;C. Warneke;C. Warneke

  • MEGAPOLI: concept of multi-scale modelling of megacity impact on air quality and climate

    A. Baklanov;M. Lawrence;S. Pandis;A. Mahura

  • Characterising sources and sinks of rural VOC in eastern France.

    Agnès Borbon;Patrice Coddeville;Nadine Locoge;Jean-Claude Galloo

  • Developing receptor-oriented methods for non-methane hydrocarbon characterisation in urban air—Part I: source identification

    Agnès Borbon;Hervé Fontaine;Nadine Locoge;Marc Veillerot

  • Characterizing the impact of urban emissions on regional aerosol particles: airborne measurements during the MEGAPOLI experiment

    E. J. Freney;K. Sellegri;F. Canonaco;A. Colomb

  • Tackling the mortality from long-term exposure to outdoor air pollution in megacities: Lessons from the Greater Cairo case study.

    Ali Wheida;Amira Nasser;Mostafa El Nazer;Agnes Borbon

  • Organic carbon at a remote site of the western Mediterranean Basin: sources and chemistry during the ChArMEx SOP2 field experiment

    Vincent Michoud;Vincent Michoud;Jean Sciare;Jean Sciare;Stéphane Sauvage;Sébastien Dusanter;Sébastien Dusanter

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Beekmann
Matthias Beekmann Paris-Est Créteil University
Nadine Locoge
Nadine Locoge IMT Lille Douai
Valérie Gros
Valérie Gros Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean Sciare
Jean Sciare Cyprus Institute
Paola Formenti
Paola Formenti Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Karine Sellegri
Karine Sellegri University of Clermont Auvergne
Urs Baltensperger
Urs Baltensperger Paul Scherrer Institute
Alfons Schwarzenboeck
Alfons Schwarzenboeck University of Clermont Auvergne
Spyros N. Pandis
Spyros N. Pandis University of Patras
Karine Sartelet
Karine Sartelet École des Ponts ParisTech

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career paths. Many students seek the easiest degree to get that aligns with their passion and offers flexible learning options. Online programs in this field often balance academic rigor with practicality, making them accessible to a broad range of learners.

One popular option is pursuing a geologist degree online. This prepares students for careers in earth sciences, emphasizing skills in analyzing geological data relevant to environmental impact assessments.

Another growing area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which plays a crucial role in environmental monitoring and planning. The best GIS programs in the US offer specialized training that equips graduates with the ability to work with spatial data crucial for environmental decision-making.

For those looking to combine environmental knowledge with leadership and policy skills, the best online MPA programs provide advanced education in public administration. This can prepare students for influential roles in government agencies and non-profits focused on sustainability and environmental regulation.

Best Scientists Citing Agnès Borbon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles