World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Zoltan-Csaba Marton

Zoltan-Csaba Marton

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
7026
World Ranking
13864
National Ranking
669

Zoltan-Csaba Marton publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoltan-Csaba Marton sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 104 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Zoltan-Csaba Marton D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoltan-Csaba Marton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Zoltan-Csaba Marton is affiliated with Agile Robots AG in Germany and has a research focus spanning various aspects of computer science and engineering. Their scholarly contributions include work in computer vision, artificial intelligence, and aerospace engineering, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach within the field of robotics and machine learning.

Their primary fields of study consist of:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Within these broad areas, their subfields of specialization include:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Media Technology
  • Control and Systems Engineering

Their research covers topics such as:

  • Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Image Processing Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Robot Manipulation and Learning

Zoltan-Csaba Marton has contributed to the following recent papers, demonstrating engagement with cutting-edge developments in robotics and AI:

  • Unknown Object Segmentation from Stereo Images, 2021, published in the 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
  • Introspective Robot Perception using Smoothed Predictions from Bayesian Neural Networks, 2021, published by elib (German Aerospace Center)
  • ResponsibleRobotBench: Benchmarking Responsible Robot Manipulation using Multi-modal Large Language Models, 2025, published on arXiv (Cornell University)

The venues in which these works have appeared include:

  • 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Zoltan-Csaba Marton frequently collaborates with several co-authors, indicating ongoing research partnerships in related domains:

  • Maximilian Durner
  • Rudolph Triebel
  • Ferenc Bálint-Benczédi
  • Martin Sundermeyer
  • Jianxiang Feng

Best Publications

  • Towards 3D Point cloud based object maps for household environments

    Radu Bogdan Rusu;Zoltan Csaba Marton;Nico Blodow;Mihai Dolha

  • Aligning point cloud views using persistent feature histograms

    R.B. Rusu;N. Blodow;Z.C. Marton;M. Beetz

  • Implicit 3D Orientation Learning for 6D Object Detection from RGB Images

    Martin Sundermeyer;Zoltan-Csaba Marton;Maximilian Durner;Manuel Brucker

  • Tutorial: Point Cloud Library: Three-Dimensional Object Recognition and 6 DOF Pose Estimation

    A. Aldoma;Z. Marton;F. Tombari;W. Wohlkinger

  • On fast surface reconstruction methods for large and noisy point clouds

    Zoltan Csaba Marton;Radu Bogdan Rusu;Michael Beetz

  • Learning informative point classes for the acquisition of object model maps

    R.B. Rusu;Z.C. Marton;N. Blodow;M. Beetz

  • Persistent Point Feature Histograms for 3D Point Clouds

    Radu Bogdan Rusu;Zoltan Csaba Marton;Nico Blodow;Michael Beetz

  • Close-range scene segmentation and reconstruction of 3D point cloud maps for mobile manipulation in domestic environments

    Radu Bogdan Rusu;Nico Blodow;Zoltan Csaba Marton;Michael Beetz

  • Model-based and learned semantic object labeling in 3D point cloud maps of kitchen environments

    Radu Bogdan Rusu;Zoltan Csaba Marton;Nico Blodow;Andreas Holzbach

  • General 3D modelling of novel objects from a single view

    Zoltan-Csaba Marton;Dejan Pangercic;Nico Blodow;Jonathan Kleinehellefort

  • Augmented Autoencoders: Implicit 3D Orientation Learning for 6D Object Detection

    Martin Sundermeyer;Zoltan-Csaba Marton;Maximilian Durner;Rudolph Triebel;Rudolph Triebel

  • On Fast Surface Reconstruction Methods for Large and Noisy Datasets

    Zoltan Csaba Marton;Radu Bogdan Rusu;Michael Beetz

  • Combined 2D-3D categorization and classification for multimodal perception systems

    Zoltan-Csaba Marton;Dejan Pangercic;Nico Blodow;Michael Beetz

  • Towards 3D object maps for autonomous household robots

    R.B. Rusu;N. Blodow;Z. Marton;A. Soos

  • Autonomous semantic mapping for robots performing everyday manipulation tasks in kitchen environments

    Nico Blodow;Lucian Cosmin Goron;Zoltan-Csaba Marton;Dejan Pangercic

  • RoboSherlock: Unstructured information processing for robot perception

    Michael Beetz;Ferenc Balint-Benczedi;Nico Blodow;Daniel Nyga

  • The Assistive Kitchen — A demonstration scenario for cognitive technical systems

    M. Beetz;F. Stulp;B. Radig;J. Bandouch

  • Multi-Path Learning for Object Pose Estimation Across Domains

    Martin Sundermeyer;Maximilian Durner;En Yen Puang;Zoltan-Csaba Marton

  • Towards Autonomous Planetary Exploration

    Martin J. Schuster;Sebastian G. Brunner;Kristin Bussmann;Stefan Büttner

  • Hierarchical object geometric categorization and appearance classification for mobile manipulation

    Zoltan-Csaba Marton;Dejan Pangercic;Radu Bogdan Rusu;Andreas Holzbach

  • Depth-based tracking with physical constraints for robot manipulation

    Tanner Schmidt;Katharina Hertkorn;Richard Newcombe;Zoltan Marton

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Beetz
Michael Beetz University of Bremen
Radu Bogdan Rusu
Radu Bogdan Rusu Fyusion, Inc
Sebastian Riedel
Sebastian Riedel University College London
Kai O. Arras
Kai O. Arras Robert Bosch (Germany)
Simon Lacroix
Simon Lacroix Laboratory for Analysis and Architecture of Systems
Kei Okada
Kei Okada University of Tokyo
Gaurav S. Sukhatme
Gaurav S. Sukhatme University of Southern California
Tatsuya Harada
Tatsuya Harada University of Tokyo
Alin Albu-Schaffer
Alin Albu-Schaffer German Aerospace Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a computer science degree in the USA opens the door to a wide variety of valuable and flexible education options. For those aiming to enhance career prospects, exploring the most valuable masters degrees can help identify programs that are highly regarded and currently in demand across many industries.

If you’re considering a faster, more affordable route, earning an associate degree online can provide fundamental skills and a pathway to entry-level roles. Many students are also searching for affordable online colleges to minimize tuition costs and avoid excessive student debt.

For applicants worried about admission requirements, there are online graduate schools with low gpa requirements that present opportunities to advance academically, even if previous grades aren’t perfect. With these diverse pathways, students can tailor their education to fit their goals, schedule, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Zoltan-Csaba Marton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles