World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 102 7605 7148 3960 3664 1089 42439

William H. Frishman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William H. Frishman between 1974 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William H. Frishman published across 53 years, from 1974 to 2026, averaging 24.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 98 publications in 2025. 102 of the 1,296 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 98. Peak 98 publications in 2025. 1974: 5 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 18 publications 1980: 13 publications 1981: 10 publications 1982: 20 publications 1983: 13 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 13 publications 1986: 10 publications 1987: 22 publications 1988: 29 publications 1989: 25 publications 1990: 17 publications 1991: 28 publications 1992: 15 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 19 publications 1995: 19 publications 1996: 22 publications 1997: 15 publications 1998: 29 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 21 publications 2002: 26 publications 2003: 21 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 25 publications 2006: 59 publications 2007: 58 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 33 publications 2014: 38 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 45 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 63 publications 2024: 87 publications 2025: 98 publications 2026: 4 publications
1974 2026

1,296 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William H. Frishman: publications per year, 1974 to 2026
Year Publications
1974 5
1975 3
1976 1
1977 1
1978 2
1979 18
1980 13
1981 10
1982 20
1983 13
1984 7
1985 13
1986 10
1987 22
1988 29
1989 25
1990 17
1991 28
1992 15
1993 9
1994 19
1995 19
1996 22
1997 15
1998 29
1999 11
2000 18
2001 21
2002 26
2003 21
2004 16
2005 25
2006 59
2007 58
2008 28
2009 20
2010 17
2011 21
2012 21
2013 33
2014 38
2015 25
2016 32
2017 27
2018 24
2019 20
2020 37
2021 45
2022 36
2023 63
2024 87
2025 98
2026 4
Total 1,296
Download as CSV

William H. Frishman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. Frishman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,081–1,100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,089 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49 1,089
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

William H. Frishman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. Frishman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630 102
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

William H. Frishman is affiliated with New York Medical College in the United States and specializes in the field of medicine, with a significant focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their recent research contributions include several publications centered on cardiovascular health and complications related to infectious diseases. Notable papers include:

  • Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Review of Possible Pathophysiological Risk Factors, 2022, Cardiology in Review
  • Thrombotic Complications of COVID-19 Infection, 2020, Cardiology in Review
  • Heavy Metal Toxicity in Chronic Renal Failure and Cardiovascular Disease, 2020, Cardiology in Review
  • Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia, 2020, Cardiology in Review
  • Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients 80 Years and Older Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), 2020, Cardiology in Review

Frequent venues for William H. Frishman's publications include:

  • Cardiology in Review
  • The American Journal of Medicine
  • PubMed
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • Archives of Medical Science - Atherosclerotic Diseases

Their research spans several subfields, including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, epidemiology, as well as endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism.

Main research topics covered by their publications include:

  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

William H. Frishman collaborates frequently with several researchers. Most common coauthors include Wilbert S. Aronow, Stephen J. Peterson, and Aaqib H. Malik.

Best Publications

  • Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study

    G. Anderson;S. Cummings;L. S. Freedman;C. Furberg

  • ACCF/AHA 2011 expert consensus document on hypertension in the elderly: A report of the american college of cardiology foundation task force on clinical expert consensus documents

    Wilbert S Aronow;Jerome J Fleg;Carl J Pepine;Nancy Trygar Artinian

  • Development of dementing illnesses in an 80-year-old volunteer cohort.

    R. Katzman;M. Aronson;P. Fuld;C. Kawas

  • Trends in Incidence, Management, and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States

    Dhaval Kolte;Sahil Khera;Wilbert S. Aronow;Marjan Mujib

  • ACCF/AHA 2011 expert consensus document on hypertension in the elderly: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus documents developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Neurology, American Geriatrics Society, American Society for Preventive Cardiology, American Society of Hypertension, American Society of Nephrology, Association of Black Cardiologists, and European Society of Hypertension

    Wilbert S. Aronow;Jerome L. Fleg;Carl J. Pepine;Nancy T. Artinian

  • Dobutamine: a new synthetic cardioactive sympathetic amine.

    Edmund H. Sonnenblick;William H. Frishman;Thierry H. LeJemtel

  • Inflammation and atherosclerosis: a review of the role of interleukin-6 in the development of atherosclerosis and the potential for targeted drug therapy.

    Joshua Hartman;William H. Frishman

  • Comparison of Self-Report, Hospital Discharge Codes, and Adjudication of Cardiovascular Events in the Women’s Health Initiative

    Susan R. Heckbert;Charles Kooperberg;Monika M. Safford;Bruce M. Psaty

  • Herbal Medicine for the Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease: Clinical Considerations

    Nick H. Mashour;George I. Lin;William H. Frishman

  • Women, myocardial infarction, and dementia in the very old.

    M. K. Aronson;W. L. Ooi;H. Morgenstern;A. Hafner

  • Co-Enzyme Q10: A New Drug for Cardiovascular Disease

    Steven Greenberg;William H. Frishman

  • Application of transesophageal echocardiography to continuous intraoperative monitoring of left ventricular performance.

    Masayuki Matsumoto;Yasu Oka;Joel Strom;William Frishman

  • beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists: new drugs and new indications.

    Jan Koch-Weser;William H. Frishman

  • Cardiovascular complications of eating disorders.

    Deena Casiero;William H Frishman

  • Beta-adrenergic blockade for survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

    William H. Frishman;Curt D. Furberg;William T. Friedewald

  • Temporal Trends and Sex Differences in Revascularization and Outcomes of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Younger Adults in the United States

    Sahil Khera;Dhaval Kolte;Tanush Gupta;Kathir Selvan Subramanian

  • β-Adrenergic Blockers

    William H. Frishman

  • Reversal of Abnormal Platelet Aggregability and Change in Exercise Tolerance in Patients with Angina Pectoris Following Oral Propranolol

    William H. Frishman;Babette Weksler;James P. Christodoulou;Charles Smithen

  • Role of magnesium in cardiovascular diseases.

    Dhaval Kolte;Krishnaswami Vijayaraghavan;Sahil Khera;Domenic A. Sica

  • Women, myocardial infarction, and dementia in the very old

    MK Aronson;WL Ooi;H Morgenstern

Frequent Co-Authors

Wilbert S. Aronow
Wilbert S. Aronow New York Medical College
Julio A. Panza
Julio A. Panza New York Medical College
Gregg C. Fonarow
Gregg C. Fonarow University of California, Los Angeles
Edmund H. Sonnenblick
Edmund H. Sonnenblick Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Ali Ahmed
Ali Ahmed Georgetown University
Deepak L. Bhatt
Deepak L. Bhatt Mount Sinai Hospital
Chul Ahn
Chul Ahn The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Joseph S. Alpert
Joseph S. Alpert University of Arizona
Peter Stone
Peter Stone The University of Texas at Austin
Domenic A. Sica
Domenic A. Sica Virginia Commonwealth University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA, you may also be interested in related online degrees that support healthcare careers. Options like an online healthcare management degree can prepare you for leadership roles within hospitals, clinics, or public health organizations.

For registered nurses eager to advance, pursuing an rn to np bridge program online makes progressing to a Nurse Practitioner both accessible and flexible.

Those passionate about nutrition and wellness can explore a bachelor's in nutrition online, a degree that opens doors to roles in clinical, community, and corporate settings.

If your career goal is healthcare administration, consider top online mha programs that are cahme accredited. These programs are recognized for meeting high standards in healthcare management education.

Exploring these online pathways provides flexibility and helps you prepare for a broad range of healthcare careers beyond traditional medical degrees.

Best Scientists Citing William H. Frishman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles