World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 65 2669 2529 1174 1101 198 21364

William F. Dove publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William F. Dove between 1957 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William F. Dove published across 67 years, from 1957 to 2023, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1993. 5 of the 217 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1957 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1993. 1957: 1 publication 1958: 0 publications 1959: 1 publication 1960: 1 publication 1961: 0 publications 1962: 3 publications 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 1 publication 1967: 1 publication 1968: 2 publications 1969: 3 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 5 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 5 publications 1978: 6 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 8 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 5 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 5 publications
1957 2023

217 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William F. Dove: publications per year, 1957 to 2023
Year Publications
1957 1
1958 0
1959 1
1960 1
1961 0
1962 3
1963 1
1964 0
1965 1
1966 1
1967 1
1968 2
1969 3
1970 2
1971 3
1972 5
1973 1
1974 1
1975 1
1976 1
1977 5
1978 6
1979 3
1980 8
1981 4
1982 1
1983 5
1984 8
1985 1
1986 3
1987 7
1988 6
1989 3
1990 3
1991 5
1992 6
1993 10
1994 6
1995 7
1996 7
1997 9
1998 5
1999 3
2000 6
2001 1
2002 2
2003 4
2004 4
2005 2
2006 3
2007 5
2008 5
2009 4
2010 0
2011 4
2012 8
2013 2
2014 6
2015 1
2016 2
2017 0
2018 1
2019 2
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 5
Total 217
Download as CSV

William F. Dove publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William F. Dove sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 195–204 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 198 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173 198
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

William F. Dove D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William F. Dove sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172 65
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1975 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

William F. Dove is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with specific work in the subfields of Spectroscopy and Molecular Biology.

Their research interests are reflected in main topics that include:

  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

They have contributed to scholarly articles published in venues such as the Journal of Proteome Research.

Their recent publication includes:

  • Quantification of Serum Metabolites in Early Colorectal Adenomas Using Isobaric Labeling Mass Spectrometry, 2023, Journal of Proteome Research

Frequent co-authors associated with their work are:

  • Yuan Liu
  • Hua Zhang
  • Zicong Wang
  • Zhijun Zhu
  • Perry J. Pickhardt

William F. Dove has received recognition through several awards, including being named a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1998 and a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1975.

Best Publications

  • A dominant mutation that predisposes to multiple intestinal neoplasia in the mouse

    Amy Rapaich Moser;Henry C. Pitot;William F. Dove

  • Mutagenesis and Mapping of a Mouse Gene, Clock, Essential for Circadian Behavior

    Martha Hotz Vitaterna;David P. King;Anne-Marie Chang;Jon M. Kornhauser

  • Multiple intestinal neoplasia caused by a mutation in the murine homolog of the APC gene.

    Li Kuo Su;Kenneth W. Kinzler;Bert Vogelstein;Antoinette C. Preisinger

  • A collection of strains containing genetically linked alternating antibiotic resistance elements for genetic mapping of Escherichia coli.

    M Singer;T A Baker;G Schnitzler;S M Deischel

  • Genetic identification of Mom-1, a major modifier locus affecting Min-induced intestinal neoplasia in the mouse.

    William F. Dietrich;Eric S. Lander;Jennifer S. Smith;Amy R. Moser

  • The knockout mouse project

    Christopher P. Austin;James F. Battey;Allan Bradley;Maja Bucan

  • Pathology of mouse models of intestinal cancer: Consensus report and recommendations

    Gregory P. Boivin;Kay Washington;Kan Yang;Jerrold M. Ward

  • Loss of Apc+ in Intestinal Adenomas from Min Mice

    Cindy Luongo;Amy R. Moser;Sarah Gledhill;William F. Dove

  • Cation effects on the denaturation of DNA

    William F. Dove;Norman Davidson

  • Secretory phospholipase Pla2g2a confers resistance to intestinal tumorigenesis.

    Robert T. Cormier;Karen H. Hong;Richard B. Halberg;Trevor L. Hawkins

  • Chemoprevention of spontaneous intestinal adenomas in the Apc Min mouse model by the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug piroxicam

    Russell F. Jacoby;David J. Marshall;Michael A. Newton;Kristian Novakovic

  • ApcMin: A mouse model for intestinal and mammary tumorigenesis

    A.R Moser;C Luongo;K.A Gould;M.K McNeley

  • Transcriptional recapitulation and subversion of embryonic colon development by mouse colon tumor models and human colon cancer

    Sergio Kaiser;Young Kyu Park;Jeffrey L. Franklin;Richard B. Halberg

  • Mouse models of human phenylketonuria.

    A Shedlovsky;J D McDonald;D Symula;W F Dove

  • Action of the lambda chromosome. I. Control of functions late in bacteriophage development.

    William F. Dove

  • APC and its modifiers in colon cancer

    Lawrence N. Kwong;William F. Dove

  • ApcMin, a mutation in the murine Apc gene, predisposes to mammary carcinomas and focal alveolar hyperplasias.

    Amy Rapaich Moser;Ellen M. Mattes;William F. Dove;Mary J. Lindstrom

  • Sulindac suppresses tumorigenesis in the Min mouse

    Yasmin Beazer-Barclay;Daniel B. Levy;Amy R. Moser;William F. Dove

  • Homozygosity for the Min Allele of Apc Results in Disruption of Mouse Development Prior to Gastrulation

    Amy Rapaich Moser;Alex R. Shoemaker;Camille S. Connelly;Linda Clipson

  • Corrections and Clarifications: Multiple Intestinal Neoplasia Caused By a Mutation in the Murine Homolog of the APC Gene

    Li-Kuo Su;Kenneth W. Kinzler;Bert Vogelstein;Antonette C. Preisinger

Frequent Co-Authors

James F. Crow
James F. Crow University of Wisconsin–Madison
Lilianna Solnica-Krezel
Lilianna Solnica-Krezel Washington University in St. Louis
Tim Schedl
Tim Schedl Washington University in St. Louis
Kevin M. Haigis
Kevin M. Haigis Harvard University
Eric S. Lander
Eric S. Lander Broad Institute
Henry C. Pitot
Henry C. Pitot University of Wisconsin–Madison
Michael R. Sussman
Michael R. Sussman University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robert J. Coffey
Robert J. Coffey Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Peter D. Hoff
Peter D. Hoff Duke University
Bert Vogelstein
Bert Vogelstein Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing genetics in the USA opens doors to diverse online education options and related career paths. Many students explore alternatives such as medical billing, coding, or health information management. For those interested in healthcare administration roles, accredited medical billing and coding schools online offer flexible pathways into this growing field, often with financial aid opportunities.

If you wish to complete your degree on a faster timeline, consider programs recognized among the fast degree programs in the country. These intensive tracks help you enter the workforce quickly—ideal for motivated students eager to start a career in genetics, biotechnology, or related sectors.

For learners balancing work or personal commitments, self paced degree programs provide the flexibility to study at your own rhythm. This lets you progress through coursework as your schedule allows, without sacrificing the quality or accreditation of your education.

Prospective genetics majors looking to minimize costs should explore online colleges with free applications. Waiving application fees makes it easier for students to apply to multiple programs and find their best fit without financial barriers.

Best Scientists Citing William F. Dove

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles