World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 39 6371 6150 2162 2073 81 6142

William E. Rogers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William E. Rogers between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William E. Rogers published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2003. 5 of the 91 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2003. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 4 publications
2000 2025

91 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William E. Rogers: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 5
2002 2
2003 6
2004 2
2005 3
2006 5
2007 5
2008 6
2009 2
2010 2
2011 2
2012 5
2013 3
2014 4
2015 5
2016 5
2017 2
2018 3
2019 4
2020 3
2021 4
2022 3
2023 3
2024 1
2025 4
Total 91
Download as CSV

William E. Rogers publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Rogers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 77–81 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 81 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173 81
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

William E. Rogers D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Rogers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254 39
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

William E. Rogers is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. Their research focuses extensively on environmental science, with a concentration on global and planetary change, ecology, and nature and landscape conservation. Their work also spans subfields such as oceanography and immunology.

The scientist's main research topics encompass rangeland and wildlife management, fire effects on ecosystems, and ecology and vegetation dynamics studies. They have also contributed to areas including plant water relations and carbon dynamics, underwater acoustics research, ocean waves and remote sensing, and agroforestry and silvopastoral systems.

William E. Rogers has published in a variety of scientific journals. Frequent venues for their work include:

  • African Journal of Range and Forage Science
  • Ecological Applications
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Ecology and Evolution

Their recent papers highlight various aspects of fire ecology, vegetation response, and environmental management. Selected recent publications are:

  • "Grass bud responses to fire in a semiarid savanna system," 2021, Ecology and Evolution
  • "High-intensity fire experiments to manage shrub encroachment: lessons learned in South Africa and the United States," 2022, African Journal of Range and Forage Science
  • "Prosopis glandulosa persistence is facilitated by differential protection of buds during low- and high-energy fires," 2021, Journal of Environmental Management
  • "Soil Heating in Fire (SheFire): A model and measurement method for estimating soil heating and effects during wildland fires," 2022, Ecological Applications
  • "Interactive effects of prescribed fire and livestock grazing on Seriphium plumosum in South African sour bushveld," 2020, African Journal of Range and Forage Science

Collaboration is a significant component of their work, with frequent coauthors including Dirac Twidwell, Carissa L. Wonkka, Alexandra G. Lodge, Heath D. Starns, and Douglas R. Tolleson. These partnerships reflect overlapping interests in fire ecology and rangeland management.

Best Publications

  • Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations

    Oliver Bossdorf;Oliver Bossdorf;Oliver Bossdorf;Harald Auge;Lucile Lafuma;William E. Rogers;William E. Rogers

  • Genetic differences in growth of an invasive tree species

    Evan Siemann;William E. Rogers

  • Changes in light and nitrogen availability under pioneer trees may indirectly facilitate tree invasions of grasslands

    Evan Siemann;William E. Rogers

  • The rising Great Plains fire campaign: citizens' response to woody plant encroachment

    Dirac Twidwell;William E Rogers;Samuel D Fuhlendorf;Carissa L Wonkka

  • HERBIVORY, DISEASE, RECRUITMENT LIMITATION, AND SUCCESS OF ALIEN AND NATIVE TREE SPECIES

    Evan Siemann;William E. Rogers

  • Reduced resistance of invasive varieties of the alien tree Sapium sebiferum to a generalist herbivore

    Evan Siemann;William E. Rogers

  • Experimental test of the impacts of feral hogs on forest dynamics and processes in the southeastern US

    Evan Siemann;Juli A. Carrillo;Christopher A. Gabler;Roy Zipp

  • Refining thresholds in coupled fire-vegetation models to improve management of encroaching woody plants in grasslands

    Dirac L. Twidwell Jr;Samuel D. Fuhlendorf;Charles A. Taylor Jr;William E. Rogers

  • Negative plant–soil feedbacks may limit persistence of an invasive tree due to rapid accumulation of soil pathogens

    Somereet Nijjer;William E Rogers;Evan Siemann

  • Increased competitive ability and herbivory tolerance in the invasive plant Sapium sebiferum

    Jianwen Zou;Jianwen Zou;William E. Rogers;William E. Rogers;Evan Siemann

  • Differences in morphological and physiological traits between native and invasive populations of Sapium sebiferum

    J. Zou;W. E. Rogers;E. Siemann

  • INCREASED COMPETITIVE ABILITY OF AN INVASIVE TREE MAY BE LIMITED BY AN INVASIVE BEETLE

    Evan Siemann;William E. Rogers

  • Process hazard analysis, hazard identification and scenario definition: Are the conventional tools sufficient, or should and can we do much better?

    Ian Cameron;Sam Mannan;Erzsébet Németh;Sunhwa Park

  • Rapid adaptation of insect herbivores to an invasive plant.

    Evan Siemann;William E Rogers;Saara J Dewalt

  • Invasive ecotypes tolerate herbivory more effectively than native ecotypes of the Chinese tallow tree Sapium sebiferum

    William E. Rogers;Evan Siemann

  • Constraints on the utilisation of the invasive Chinese tallow tree Sapium sebiferum by generalist native herbivores in coastal prairies

    Richard A. Lankau;Richard A. Lankau;William E. Rogers;Evan Siemann

  • Effects of simulated herbivory and resource availability on native and invasive exotic tree seedlings

    William E. Rogers;Evan Siemann

  • Extreme prescribed fire during drought reduces survival and density of woody resprouters

    Dirac Twidwell;William E. Rogers;Carissa L. Wonkka;Charles A. Taylor

  • Temporal vegetation dynamics and recolonization mechanisms on different-sized soil disturbances in tallgrass prairie.

    William E. Rogers;David C. Hartnett

  • The effect of Chinese tallow tree ( Sapium sebiferum ) ecotype on soil–plant system carbon and nitrogen processes

    Jianwen Zou;William E. Rogers;William E. Rogers;Saara J. DeWalt;Saara J. DeWalt;Evan Siemann

Frequent Co-Authors

Evan Siemann
Evan Siemann Rice University
Dirac Twidwell
Dirac Twidwell University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Jianwen Zou
Jianwen Zou Nanjing Agricultural University
Saara J. DeWalt
Saara J. DeWalt Clemson University
William E. Grant
William E. Grant Texas A&M University
David C. Hartnett
David C. Hartnett Kansas State University
Urs P. Kreuter
Urs P. Kreuter Texas A&M University
Oliver Bossdorf
Oliver Bossdorf University of Tübingen
Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi
Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi Texas A&M University
Samuel D. Fuhlendorf
Samuel D. Fuhlendorf Oklahoma State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your career in Ecology and Evolution can benefit from an interdisciplinary approach rooted in the biological sciences. Many students consider online learning for greater flexibility, and there are several related pathways worth exploring.

For those interested in specialized fields like communication disorders, the SLP bridge pathway for communication sciences graduates provides a route for non-SLP majors to enter speech-language pathology through an online format. Healthcare-focused students may also look into online bsn programs for non nurses, which allow for a quicker transition into nursing professions.

A background in biological sciences can open doors to advanced clinical roles. For example, examining dnp psychiatric nurse practitioner salary trends by state helps you make informed decisions about future education and potential earnings. If your goals include becoming a nurse practitioner, learning how to become nurse practitioner quickly can guide your planning for graduate studies and clinical training.

Exploring these related online degrees and career pathways can expand your opportunities and provide valuable perspectives for a career rooted in Ecology, Evolution, and the life sciences.

Best Scientists Citing William E. Rogers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles