World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
25881
World Ranking
18320
National Ranking
9143

Vincent L. Gott publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vincent L. Gott sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 301 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Vincent L. Gott D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vincent L. Gott sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Vincent L. Gott was affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States throughout their academic career. Their work was connected to this institution, reflecting a focus within an established research environment.

There are no records of recent papers, co-authors, or specific publication venues linked to Vincent L. Gott. Similarly, there are no listed book publications or detailed information available about main fields or subfields of study, or main research topics explored during their career.

There is also no information regarding awards received or notable citations attributed to Vincent L. Gott. The absence of this data limits the ability to detail particular research contributions or academic recognition.

Vincent L. Gott was deceased at the time of this profile's compilation. The available data provides a limited but factual overview of their academic association without further detail on their research output or specific areas of scientific inquiry.

Best Publications

  • A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association

    WG Austen;JE Edwards;RL Frye;GG Gensini

  • Termination of Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias with an Implanted Automatic Defibrillator in Human Beings

    M. Mirowski;Philip R. Reid;Morton M. Mower;Levi Watkins

  • Replacement of the aortic root in patients with Marfan's syndrome.

    V L Gott;P S Greene;D E Alejo;D E Cameron

  • Stroke following coronary artery bypass grafting: a ten-year study.

    Timothy J. Gardner;Peter J. Horneffer;Teri A. Manolio;Thomas A. Pearson

  • Mediastinal infection after cardiac surgery

    Michael G. Sarr;Vincent L. Gott;Timothy R. Townsend

  • Unstable angina pectoris: National cooperative study group to compare surgical and medical therapy: II. In-Hospital experience and initial follow-up results in patients with one, two and three vessel disease

    R.O. Russell;R.E. Moraski;N. Kouchoukos;R. Karp

  • Aortic root replacement in 271 Marfan patients: a 24-year experience

    Vincent L Gott;Duke E Cameron;Diane E Alejo;Peter S Greene

  • Application of Haptic Feedback to Robotic Surgery

    Brian T. Bethea;Allison M. Okamura;Masaya Kitagawa;Torin P. Fitton

  • Early Surgical Experience With Loeys-Dietz: A New Syndrome of Aggressive Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Disease

    Jason A. Williams;Bart L. Loeys;Bart L. Loeys;Lois U. Nwakanma;Harry C. Dietz;Harry C. Dietz

  • Mechanisms of ischemic myocardial cell damage assessed by phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance.

    J T Flaherty;M L Weisfeldt;B H Bulkley;T J Gardner

  • Surgical Treatment of Aneurysms of the Ascending Aorta in the Marfan Syndrome

    Vincent L. Gott;Reed E. Pyeritz;George J. Magovern;Duke E. Cameron

  • Mechanical heart valves: 50 years of evolution

    Vincent L Gott;Diane E Alejo;Duke E Cameron

  • Autotransfusion of shed mediastinal blood after cardiac surgery: A prospective study

    Hartzell V. Schaff;Jerome M. Hauer;William R. Bell;Timothy J. Gardner

  • Aortic root replacement: Risk factor analysis of a seventeen-year experience with 270 patients

    Vincent L. Gott;A.Marc Gillinov;Reed E. Pyeritz;Duke E. Cameron

  • Aortic root replacement in 372 Marfan patients: evolution of operative repair over 30 years.

    Duke E. Cameron;Diane E. Alejo;Nishant D. Patel;Lois U. Nwakanma

  • The first open heart corrections of tetralogy of Fallot. A 26-31 year follow-up of 106 patients.

    C. Lillehei;Richard Varco;Morley Cohen;Herbert Warden

  • Unstable angina pectoris: morbidity and mortality in 57 consecutive patients evaluated angiographically.

    C. Richard Conti;Robert K. Brawley;Lawrence S.C. Griffith;Bertram Pitt

  • The direct vision correction of calcific aortic stenosis by means of a pump-oxygenator and retrograde coronary sinus perfusion.

    C. Walton Lillehei;Richard A. DeWALL;Richard A. DeWALL;Vincent L. Gott;Richard L. Varco

  • Feasibility and Effectiveness of Low-Energy Catheter Defibrillation in Man

    M. Mirowski;Morton M. Mower;Vincent L. Gott;Robert K. Brawley

  • Changes in intramyocardial ST segment voltage and gas tensions with regional myocardial ischemia in the dog.

    Shukri F. Khuri;John T. Flaherty;John B. O'Riordan;Bertram Pitt

Frequent Co-Authors

William A. Baumgartner
William A. Baumgartner Johns Hopkins University
Bernadine H. Bulkley
Bernadine H. Bulkley Johns Hopkins University
Bruce A. Reitz
Bruce A. Reitz Stanford University
Reed E. Pyeritz
Reed E. Pyeritz University of Pennsylvania
Harry C. Dietz
Harry C. Dietz Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Grover M. Hutchins
Grover M. Hutchins Johns Hopkins University
Victor A. McKusick
Victor A. McKusick Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Mary E. Blue
Mary E. Blue Kennedy Krieger Institute
Lewis C. Becker
Lewis C. Becker Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Mortimer J. Buckley
Mortimer J. Buckley Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The medical field offers a variety of online degrees and career pathways to help you get started or advance in healthcare. For those looking to begin their journey, exploring a low cost medical coding and billing online program can open doors to essential administrative roles in hospitals and clinics.

If you’re interested in hands-on patient care, enrolling in the cheapest online nursing program is a cost-effective way to become a registered nurse. For those aiming to provide advanced patient care, the cheapest online acute care nurse practitioner programs offer specialized training to prepare you for acute medical environments.

Aspiring leaders in nursing can pursue higher-level roles with the cheapest online dnp programs, which focus on clinical practice, leadership, and research. With these flexible online options, students can gain valuable qualifications and further their medical careers without sacrificing affordability or convenience.

Best Scientists Citing Vincent L. Gott

Recently Published Articles