World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
12570
World Ranking
6586
National Ranking
155

Valerie Treyer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valerie Treyer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 163 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Valerie Treyer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valerie Treyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Valerie Treyer is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their research primarily covers the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Other subfields include Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neurology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Their work spans several main topics, including:

  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Frequent publication venues for Valerie Treyer include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Annals of Neurology
  • European Heart Journal

Their recent papers include:

  • Tauvid™: The First FDA-Approved PET Tracer for Imaging Tau Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease (2021), Pharmaceuticals
  • Heart-brain interactions in cardiac and brain diseases: why sex matters (2022), European Heart Journal
  • [18F]FDG uptake of axillary lymph nodes after COVID-19 vaccination in oncological PET/CT: frequency, intensity, and potential clinical impact (2021), European Radiology
  • Microvascular dysfunction and sympathetic hyperactivity in women with supra-normal left ventricular ejection fraction (snLVEF) (2020), European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Radiation dosimetry of 18F-AzaFol: A first in-human use of a folate receptor PET tracer (2020), EJNMMI Research

Their frequent co-authors are:

  • Anton Gietl
  • Christoph Höck
  • Roger M. Nitsch
  • Philipp A. Kaufmann
  • Cathérine Gebhard

Best Publications

  • Diminishing Reciprocal Fairness by Disrupting the Right Prefrontal Cortex

    Daria Knoch;Daria Knoch;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Kaspar Meyer;Valerie Treyer

  • Disruption of right prefrontal cortex by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces risk-taking behavior

    Daria Knoch;Lorena R. R. Gianotti;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Valerie Treyer

  • Electromagnetic fields, such as those from mobile phones, alter regional cerebral blood flow and sleep and waking EEG.

    R. Huber;V. Treyer;A. A. Borbély;J. Schuderer

  • Glucocorticoid-induced impairment of declarative memory retrieval is associated with reduced blood flow in the medial temporal lobe.

    Dominique J.-F. De Quervain;Katharina Henke;Amanda Aerni;Valerie Treyer

  • Reduced Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 Density in Major Depression Determined by [11C]ABP688 PET and Postmortem Study

    Alexandra Deschwanden;Beata Karolewicz;Anteneh M. Feyissa;Valerie Treyer

  • Exposure to pulse-modulated radio frequency electromagnetic fields affects regional cerebral blood flow.

    R. Huber;V. Treyer;J. Schuderer;T. Berthold

  • Colocalization of cerebral iron with Amyloid beta in Mild Cognitive Impairment.

    J. M. G. van Bergen;X. Li;X. Li;J. Hua;J. Hua;S. J. Schreiner

  • CT vs 68Ge attenuation correction in a combined PET/CT system: evaluation of the effect of lowering the CT tube current

    Ehab Kamel;Thomas F Hany;Cyrill Burger;Valerie Treyer

  • Human PET Studies of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 5 with 11C-ABP688

    Simon M. Ametamey;Valerie Treyer;Johannes Streffer;Matthias T. Wyss

  • Selection of Currently Relevant Memories by the Human Posterior Medial Orbitofrontal Cortex

    Armin Schnider;Valerie Treyer;Alfred Buck

  • Lateralized and frequency-dependent effects of prefrontal rTMS on regional cerebral blood flow

    D. Knoch;Valerie Treyer;M. Regard;René M. Müri

  • Marked global reduction in mGluR5 receptor binding in smokers and ex-smokers determined by [11C]ABP688 positron emission tomography

    Funda Akkus;Simon M. Ametamey;Valerie Treyer;Cyrill Burger

  • Absolute Quantification of Cerebral Blood Flow with Magnetic Resonance, Reproducibility of the Method, and Comparison with H215O Positron Emission Tomography:

    Timothy J. Carroll;Vincenzo Teneggi;Mathieu Jobin;Lisa Squassante

  • Nonconscious formation and reactivation of semantic associations by way of the medial temporal lobe.

    Katharina Henke;Christian R.A Mondadori;Valerie Treyer;Roger M Nitsch

  • H215O or 13NH3 PET and electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) during partial status epilepticus

    D. Zumsteg;R. A. Wennberg;V. Treyer;A. Buck

  • Time-course of “off-line” prefrontal rTMS effects — a PET study ☆

    Christoph Eisenegger;Valerie Treyer;Ernst Fehr;Ernst Fehr;Daria Knoch;Daria Knoch

  • F-18 FDG whole-body PET for the assessment of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

    Gerhard W. Goerres;Adrian Forster;Daniel Uebelhart;Burkhardt Seifert

  • Application of Oral Contrast Media in Coregistered Positron Emission Tomography—CT

    Elena V Dizendorf;Valerie Treyer;Gustav K Von Schulthess;Thomas F Hany

  • Tauvid™: The First FDA-Approved PET Tracer for Imaging Tau Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease

    Caitlin V M L Jie;Valerie Treyer;Roger Schibli;Linjing Mu;Linjing Mu

  • Attention and Interhemispheric Transfer: A Behavioral and fMRI Study

    B. Weber;V. Treyer;N. Oberholzer;T. Jaermann

  • Absolute Quantification of Cerebral Blood Flow With Magnetic Resonance, Reproducibility of the Method, and Comparison

    Timothy J. Carroll;Vincenzo Teneggi;Mathieu Jobin;Lisa Squassante

Frequent Co-Authors

Alfred Buck
Alfred Buck University of Zurich
Philipp A. Kaufmann
Philipp A. Kaufmann University of Zurich
Roger M. Nitsch
Roger M. Nitsch University of Zurich
Christoph Hock
Christoph Hock University of Zurich
Gregor Hasler
Gregor Hasler University of Fribourg
Bruno Weber
Bruno Weber University of Zurich
Oliver Gaemperli
Oliver Gaemperli University of Zurich
Gustav K. von Schulthess
Gustav K. von Schulthess University of Zurich
Mark E. Schmidt
Mark E. Schmidt Janssen (Belgium)
Armin Schnider
Armin Schnider University of Geneva

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a wide range of rewarding online degrees and dynamic career pathways. Many students interested in neuroscience also consider supplementary or alternative programs in counseling and psychology, which offer versatile routes into healthcare, education, and therapy professions.

If you're passionate about education and mental health, explore the university of the cumberlands school counseling programs. For those aiming to provide clinical support, an online clinical mental health counseling degree can pave the way toward licensure and direct client work.

Interested in supporting families and relationships? Pursuing an online master's degree in marriage and family therapy can equip you with advanced therapeutic skills. When considering a career investment, it's essential to research how much does a masters in psychology cost to make informed decisions about your future.

Each of these online pathways offers flexibility, affordability, and a strong link to in-demand careers supporting mental health and well-being.

Best Scientists Citing Valerie Treyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles