World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
8286
World Ranking
10039
National Ranking
111

Daria Knoch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daria Knoch sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daria Knoch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daria Knoch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Diminishing Reciprocal Fairness by Disrupting the Right Prefrontal Cortex

    Daria Knoch;Daria Knoch;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Kaspar Meyer;Valerie Treyer

  • Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice

    Bernd Figner;Daria Knoch;Eric J Johnson;Amy R Krosch;Amy R Krosch

  • Disruption of right prefrontal cortex by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces risk-taking behavior

    Daria Knoch;Lorena R. R. Gianotti;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Valerie Treyer

  • Diminishing risk-taking behavior by modulating activity in the prefrontal cortex: a direct current stimulation study.

    Shirley Fecteau;Daria Knoch;Felipe Fregni;Natasha Sultani

  • Dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex orchestrate normative choice

    Thomas Baumgartner;Daria Knoch;Philine Hotz;Christoph Eisenegger;Christoph Eisenegger

  • Functional brain network efficiency predicts intelligence

    Nicolas Langer;Andreas Pedroni;Andreas Pedroni;Lorena R.R. Gianotti;Jürgen Hänggi

  • Personality, risky health behaviour, and perceived susceptibility to health risks:

    Margarette Vollrath;Daria Knoch;Loredana Cassano

  • Studying the neurobiology of social interaction with transcranial direct current stimulation--the example of punishing unfairness.

    Daria Knoch;Michael A. Nitsche;Urs Fischbacher;Christoph Eisenegger

  • Resisting the power of temptations: the right prefrontal cortex and self-control.

    Daria Knoch;Daria Knoch;Ernst Fehr;Ernst Fehr

  • When and how pro-environmental attitudes turn into behavior: The role of costs, benefits, and self-control

    Unknown

  • Disrupting the prefrontal cortex diminishes the human ability to build a good reputation

    Daria Knoch;Frédéric Schneider;Daniel Schunk;Martin Hohmann

  • Tonic Activity Level in the Right Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Individuals' Risk Taking

    Lorena R.R. Gianotti;Daria Knoch;Pascal L. Faber;Dietrich Lehmann

  • Intergroup bias in third-party punishment stems from both ingroup favoritism and outgroup discrimination

    Bastian Schiller;Thomas Baumgartner;Daria Knoch

  • Lateralized and frequency-dependent effects of prefrontal rTMS on regional cerebral blood flow

    D. Knoch;Valerie Treyer;M. Regard;René M. Müri

  • Time-course of “off-line” prefrontal rTMS effects — a PET study ☆

    Christoph Eisenegger;Valerie Treyer;Ernst Fehr;Ernst Fehr;Daria Knoch;Daria Knoch

  • Dopamine Receptor D4 Polymorphism Predicts the Effect of L-DOPA on Gambling Behavior

    Christoph Eisenegger;Daria Knoch;Richard P. Ebstein;Lorena R.R. Gianotti

  • Frequency of everyday pro-environmental behaviour is explained by baseline activation in lateral prefrontal cortex

    Thomas Baumgartner;Benedikt P. Langenbach;Lorena R. R. Gianotti;René M. Müri

  • A Neural Marker of Costly Punishment Behavior

    Daria Knoch;Lorena R.R. Gianotti;Lorena R.R. Gianotti;Thomas Baumgartner;Thomas Baumgartner;Ernst Fehr;Ernst Fehr

  • Diminishing parochialism in intergroup conflict by disrupting the right temporo-parietal junction.

    Thomas Baumgartner;Bastian Schiller;Jörg Rieskamp;Lorena R.R. Gianotti

  • Cognitive Resources Moderate the Relationship Between Pro-Environmental Attitudes and Green Behavior:

    Benedikt P. Langenbach;Sebastian Berger;Thomas Baumgartner;Daria Knoch

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernst Fehr
Ernst Fehr University of Zurich
Urs Fischbacher
Urs Fischbacher University of Konstanz
Peter Brugger
Peter Brugger University of Zurich
Marianne Regard
Marianne Regard University of Zurich
Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Alvaro Pascual-Leone Harvard University
Richard P. Ebstein
Richard P. Ebstein Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
Valerie Treyer
Valerie Treyer University of Zurich
Uwe Herwig
Uwe Herwig University of Zurich
René M. Müri
René M. Müri University of Bern
Scott A. Huettel
Scott A. Huettel Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daria Knoch