World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 92 11320 10641 1073 1025 351 30545

Thomas Reilly publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Reilly between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Reilly published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 185 publications in 2005. 4 of the 535 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 185. Peak 185 publications in 2005. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 31 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 185 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 33 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 34 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1979 2025

535 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Reilly: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 1
1981 0
1982 2
1983 2
1984 5
1985 0
1986 3
1987 2
1988 7
1989 3
1990 8
1991 3
1992 5
1993 6
1994 5
1995 7
1996 2
1997 9
1998 9
1999 12
2000 19
2001 10
2002 9
2003 31
2004 12
2005 185
2006 18
2007 26
2008 33
2009 32
2010 6
2011 8
2012 6
2013 34
2014 2
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 4
2021 0
2022 2
2023 1
2024 1
2025 3
Total 535
Download as CSV

Thomas Reilly publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Reilly sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 351 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 351
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Reilly D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Reilly sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 92
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas Reilly is affiliated with Liverpool John Moores University in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly lies within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Neurology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.

Their main research topics cover a wide range of areas including inflammasome and immune disorders, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, laser applications in dentistry and medicine, pain management and treatment, and aspects related to sports such as sports performance and training, sports injuries and prevention, and sport psychology and performance.

Thomas Reilly's recent publications feature contributions to journals spanning multiple disciplines. Their papers include the following:

  • "Science and Hurling: A Review" (2022, Sports)
  • "The NLRP3 inflammasome: A central player in multiple sclerosis" (2024, Biochemical Pharmacology)
  • "Letter to the editor regarding "The majority of ruptured aneurysms are small with low rupture risk scores"" (2022, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience)
  • "Development of inflammasome assays to assess novel therapeutics in immune cells related to multiple sclerosis pathogenesis" (2023, Planta Medica)
  • "P036 MICROMAGNETIC STIMULATION OF THE RAT SPINAL CORD WITH SELECTIVE IPSILATERAL RECRUITMENT OF EMGS" (2025, Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface")

Frequent coauthors in their work include Almudena Otálora-Alcaraz, Eric J. Downer, Alpaslan Ersöz, Douglas D. Weber, and Kieran Collins.

Thomas Reilly has published multiple papers in notable venues, with the most frequent publication outlets being:

  • Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface
  • Sports
  • Biochemical Pharmacology
  • Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
  • Planta Medica

Their interdisciplinary approach integrates detailed molecular and clinical research methodologies, particularly focusing on neurological and immune-related conditions. They notably explore mechanisms such as inflammasomes in the context of diseases like multiple sclerosis and investigate neuromodulation techniques relevant to spinal cord function.

Through their work in sports medicine and related domains, they contribute to understanding sports performance, injury prevention, and therapeutic applications involving laser technologies and pain management.

Best Publications

  • Anthropometric and physiological predispositions for elite soccer

    Thomas Reilly;Jens Bangsbo;A. Franks

  • Handbook of Soccer Match Analysis: A Systematic Approach to Improving Performance

    Christopher Carling;A. Mark Williams;Thomas Reilly

  • Circadian variation in sports performance.

    Greg Atkinson;Thomas Reilly

  • The role of motion analysis in elite soccer: contemporary performance measurement techniques and work rate data.

    Christopher Carling;Jonathan Bloomfield;Lee Nelsen;Thomas Reilly

  • Anthropometric and fitness characteristics of international, professional and amateur male graduate soccer players from an elite youth academy

    Franck le Gall;Christopher Carling;Mark Williams;Thomas Reilly

  • Jet lag: trends and coping strategies

    Jim Waterhouse;Thomas Reilly;Greg Atkinson;Ben Edwards

  • Kinanthropometry and Exercise Physiology Laboratory Manual: Tests, Procedures and Data: Volume Two: Physiology

    Roger Eston;Thomas Reilly

  • Future perspectives in the evaluation of the physiological demands of soccer.

    Barry Drust;Greg Atkinson;Thomas Reilly

  • Performance Assessment for Field Sports

    Christopher Carling;Thomas Reilly;A. Mark Williams

  • Estimating human energy expenditure: a review of techniques with particular reference to doubly labelled water.

    Philip N. Ainslie;Thomas Reilly;Klass R. Westerterp

  • Altered sleep–wake cycles and physical performance in athletes

    Thomas Reilly;Ben Edwards

  • Incidence of Injuries in Elite French Youth Soccer Players: A 10-Season Study

    Franck Le Gall;Christopher Carling;Thomas Reilly;Henry Vandewalle

  • The circadian rhythm of core temperature: origin and some implications for exercise performance.

    Jim Waterhouse;Barry Drust;Dietmar Weinert;Benjamin Edwards

  • Do anthropometric and fitness characteristics vary according to birth date distribution in elite youth academy soccer players

    C. Carling;F. Le Gall;T. Reilly;A. M. Williams

  • Quantification of the physiological loading of one week of “pre-season” and one week of “in-season” training in professional soccer players

    Tae-Seok Jeong;Tom Reilly;James Morton;Sang-Won Bae

  • The use of recovery methods post‐exercise

    Thomas Reilly;Bjorn Ekblom

  • Muscle Fatigue during Football Match-Play

    Thomas Reilly;Barry Drust;Neil Clarke

  • Injuries in young elite female soccer players: an 8-season prospective study.

    Franck Le Gall;Christopher Carling;Thomas Reilly

  • The specificity of training prescription and physiological assessment: A review

    Thomas Reilly;Tessa Morris;Greg Whyte

  • Lifestyle factors and colorectal cancer risk (1): systematic review and meta‐analysis of associations with body mass index

    D J Harriss;G Atkinson;K George;N Tim Cable

Frequent Co-Authors

Duarte Araújo
Duarte Araújo University of Lisbon
Greg Atkinson
Greg Atkinson Teesside University
A. Mark Williams
A. Mark Williams University of Utah
Keith Davids
Keith Davids Sheffield Hallam University
Keith George
Keith George Liverpool John Moores University
Simon Folkard
Simon Folkard Swansea University
Roger G. Eston
Roger G. Eston University of South Australia
Jens Bangsbo
Jens Bangsbo University of Copenhagen
Andrew G Renehan
Andrew G Renehan University of Manchester
Eus J.W. Van Someren
Eus J.W. Van Someren Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine doesn’t always mean following the traditional M.D. route. There are numerous fast track LPN programs online, allowing students to quickly enter the workforce as Licensed Practical Nurses. These can be ideal for those looking to gain clinical experience early or for career changers seeking a healthcare role with flexible study options.

For registered nurses aiming for advanced practice or leadership, exploring the shortest online DNP program options is a smart move. These programs are designed for efficiency, enabling professionals to earn their Doctor of Nursing Practice credential in less time without sacrificing education quality.

If you’re seeking a program with lighter prerequisites or fewer barriers, several DNP programs focus on accessibility and flexibility. Additionally, those interested in mental health can directly enter specialized fields through the fastest psych NP program tracks, preparing graduates for advanced psychiatric roles in record time.

Exploring these diverse online degrees not only opens up unique career pathways but also supports lifelong learning in the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Reilly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles