World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
42
Citations
11557
World Ranking
3358
National Ranking
234

Taylor S. Feild publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Taylor S. Feild sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 63 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Taylor S. Feild D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Taylor S. Feild sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - William S. Cooper Award, The Ecological Society of America Angiosperms helped put the rain in the rainforests: The impact of plant physiological evolution on tropical biodiversity. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 97:527-540

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Flowering plant

Taylor S. Feild mostly deals with Ecology, Botany, Photosynthesis, Xylem and Water transport. His Ecology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Chloranthaceae and Transpiration. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Rainforest and Plant physiology.

Taylor S. Feild has researched Rainforest in several fields, including Plant ecology, Biodiversity, Climate change and Vascular plant. His Plant physiology research includes themes of Terrestrial plant and Tracheid. His Water transport research spans across into subjects like Vegetation, Biome and Arid.

His most cited work include:

  • Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought (1256 citations)
  • Leaf Maximum Photosynthetic Rate and Venation Are Linked by Hydraulics (577 citations)
  • Why Leaves Turn Red in Autumn. The Role of Anthocyanins in Senescing Leaves of Red-Osier Dogwood (411 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Taylor S. Feild mainly focuses on Botany, Ecology, Xylem, Water transport and Rainforest. Taylor S. Feild combines Ecology and Context in his studies. His Tracheid study, which is part of a larger body of work in Xylem, is frequently linked to Perforation, bridging the gap between disciplines.

His Water transport investigation overlaps with other areas such as Arid, Biome and Climate change. His work carried out in the field of Rainforest brings together such families of science as Biodiversity, Canopy, Tropics and Vegetation. His Photosynthesis research incorporates themes from Acclimatization, Anthocyanin, Palisade cell and Plant physiology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (66.07%)
  • Ecology (53.57%)
  • Xylem (42.86%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2017)?

  • Ecology (53.57%)
  • Evolutionary biology (7.14%)
  • Transpiration (19.64%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Taylor S. Feild mainly investigates Ecology, Evolutionary biology, Transpiration, Permian and Fossil evidence. He studies Ecology, namely Organic matter. Taylor S. Feild interconnects Botany, Subgenus, Coalescent theory, Phylogenetic network and Reticulate evolution in the investigation of issues within Evolutionary biology.

His Transpiration research integrates issues from Woody plant and Xylem. Permian is connected with Time gap, Flowering plant and Molecular dating in his research.

Between 2014 and 2017, his most popular works were:

  • Weak tradeoff between xylem safety and xylem-specific hydraulic efficiency across the world's woody plant species (269 citations)
  • Stable isotopes in leaf water of terrestrial plants. (136 citations)
  • New Caledonia: a Pleistocene refugium for rain forest lineages of relict angiosperms (25 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Flowering plant

His primary areas of investigation include Ecology, Transpiration, Management research, Hydraulic efficiency and Nitrogen fertilizer. Ecology is a component of his Organic matter and Rainforest studies. As part of his studies on Organic matter, Taylor S. Feild often connects relevant subjects like Terrestrial plant.

His Rainforest research includes elements of Species distribution, Habitat and Vegetation. Many of his Management research research pursuits overlap with Woody plant, Biological sciences and Xylem. His Refugium study spans across into fields like Pleistocene and Range.

Best Publications

  • Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought

    Brendan Choat;Steven Jansen;Tim J. Brodribb;Hervé Cochard;Hervé Cochard

  • Leaf Maximum Photosynthetic Rate and Venation Are Linked by Hydraulics

    Tim J. Brodribb;Taylor S. Feild;Gregory J. Jordan

  • Weak tradeoff between xylem safety and xylem-specific hydraulic efficiency across the world's woody plant species

    Sean M. Gleason;Sean M. Gleason;Mark Westoby;Steven Jansen;Brendan Choat

  • Why Leaves Turn Red in Autumn. The Role of Anthocyanins in Senescing Leaves of Red-Osier Dogwood

    Taylor S. Feild;David W. Lee;N. Michele Holbrook

  • Stem hydraulic supply is linked to leaf photosynthetic capacity: evidence from New Caledonian and Tasmanian rainforests

    T. J. Brodribb;T. S. Feild

  • Leaf hydraulic evolution led a surge in leaf photosynthetic capacity during early angiosperm diversification

    Tim J. Brodribb;Taylor S. Feild

  • Angiosperm leaf vein evolution was physiologically and environmentally transformative

    C. Kevin Boyce;Tim J. Brodribb;Taylor S. Feild;Maciej A. Zwieniecki

  • Viewing leaf structure and evolution from a hydraulic perspective

    Tim J. Brodribb;Taylor S. Feild;Taylor S. Feild;Lawren Sack

  • Stable isotopes in leaf water of terrestrial plants.

    Lucas A. Cernusak;Margaret M. Barbour;Stefan K. Arndt;Alexander W. Cheesman

  • Dark and disturbed: a new image of early angiosperm ecology

    Taylor S. Feild;Nan Crystal Arens;James A. Doyle;Todd E. Dawson

  • Evolution of stomatal responsiveness to CO2 and optimization of water‐use efficiency among land plants

    Timothy J. Brodribb;Scott A. M. McAdam;Gregory J. Jordan;Taylor S. Feild

  • Pigment dynamics and autumn leaf senescence in a New England deciduous forest, eastern USA

    David W. Lee;David W. Lee;John O'Keefe;N. Michele Holbrook;Taylor S. Feild

  • Fossil evidence for Cretaceous escalation in angiosperm leaf vein evolution.

    Taylor S. Feild;Timothy J. Brodribb;Ari Iglesias;David S. Chatelet

  • Nonphotochemical Reduction of the Plastoquinone Pool in Sunflower Leaves Originates from Chlororespiration

    Taylor S. Feild;Ladislav Nedbal;Donald R. Ort

  • A potential role for xylem-phloem interactions in the hydraulic architecture of trees: effects of phloem girdling on xylem hydraulic conductance.

    Maciej A. Zwieniecki;Peter J. Melcher;Taylor S. Feild;N. Michele Holbrook

  • Stem water transport and freeze-thaw xylem embolism in conifers and angiosperms in a Tasmanian treeline heath.

    Taylor S. Feild;Tim Brodribb

  • Hydathodal leaf teeth of Chloranthus japonicus (Chloranthaceae) prevent guttation‐induced flooding of the mesophyll

    Taylor S. Feild;Tammy L. Sage;Christine Czerniak;William J. D. Iles

  • Ancestral xerophobia: a hypothesis on the whole plant ecophysiology of early angiosperms.

    Taylor Feild;David Chatelet;Timothy Brodribb

  • Hydraulic Consequences of Vessel Evolution in Angiosperms

    John S. Sperry;Uwe G. Hacke;Taylor S. Feild;Yuzuo Sano

  • Paleo-Antarctic rainforest into the modern Old World tropics: the rich past and threatened future of the "southern wet forest survivors"

    Robert M. Kooyman;Robert M. Kooyman;Peter Wilf;Viviana Dora Barreda;Raymond J. Carpenter

  • Water transport in vesselless angiosperms: conducting efficiency and cavitation safety

    Uwe G. Hacke;John S. Sperry;Taylor S. Feild;Yuzou Sano

  • Hydraulic tuning of vein cell microstructure in the evolution of angiosperm venation networks.

    Taylor S. Feild;Timothy J. Brodribb

  • The ecophysiology of early angiosperms.

    Taylor S. Feild;Nan Crystal Arens

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy J. Brodribb
Timothy J. Brodribb University of Tasmania
N. Michele Holbrook
N. Michele Holbrook Harvard University
John S. Sperry
John S. Sperry University of Utah
Todd E. Dawson
Todd E. Dawson University of California, Berkeley
Maciej A. Zwieniecki
Maciej A. Zwieniecki University of California, Davis
Hervé Cochard
Hervé Cochard INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Uwe G. Hacke
Uwe G. Hacke University of Alberta
Sean M. Gleason
Sean M. Gleason Agricultural Research Service
Amy E. Zanne
Amy E. Zanne University of Miami
Brendan Choat
Brendan Choat Western Sydney University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Taylor S. Feild

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles