World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
4928
World Ranking
9035
National Ranking
3817

Steven S. Schreiber publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven S. Schreiber sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 76 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Steven S. Schreiber D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven S. Schreiber sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven S. Schreiber is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research focuses on healthcare systems, technology, and related organizational and management aspects within medical practice.

The scientist has contributed to several publications, primarily in the journal Neurology. Their recent papers include the following:

  • Teleneurology Outpatient Consultations: Patient and Referring Provider Perceptions (2022, Neurology)
  • The National TeleNeurology Program (NTNP): Targeting rural Veterans to provide equitable access to specialty care (2022, Neurology)
  • VA National TeleNeurology Program: Patient Characteristics and Access to Care (2022, Neurology)

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Steven S. Schreiber are:

  • Aditi Narechania
  • Jayne Wilkinson
  • Heidi Watson
  • Linda S. Williams
  • Holly Martin

Schreiber's research spans several fields of study, with a particular focus on management and organizational behavior within healthcare contexts. The main fields and subfields include:

  • Business, Management and Accounting
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Their main topics of work cover:

  • Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Radiology practices and education

Best Publications

  • Nicotinamide restores cognition in Alzheimer's disease transgenic mice via a mechanism involving sirtuin inhibition and selective reduction of Thr231-phosphotau.

    Kim N. Green;Joan S. Steffan;Hilda Martinez-Coria;Xuemin Sun

  • p53 induction is associated with neuronal damage in the central nervous system.

    Shahin Sakhi;Annadora Bruce;Ning Sun;Georges Tocco

  • Maturational Regulation and Regional Induction of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Rat Brain: Implications for Alzheimer's Disease

    G. Tocco;J. Freire-Moar;S.S. Schreiber;S.H. Sakhi

  • Amyloid-Peptide Vaccinations Reduce β-Amyloid Plaques but Exacerbate Vascular Deposition and Inflammation in the Retina of Alzheimer’s Transgenic Mice

    Bingqian Liu;Bingqian Liu;Suhail Rasool;Zhikuan Yang;Charles G. Glabe

  • DARPP-32 and regulation of the ethanol sensitivity of NMDA receptors in the nucleus accumbens.

    R. E. Maldve;T. A. Zhang;K. Ferrani-Kile;S. S. Schreiber

  • Chronic Nicotine Treatment Enhances Focal Ischemic Brain Injury and Depletes Free Pool of Brain Microvascular Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Rats

    Liang Wang;Mamoru Kittaka;Ning Sun;Steven S. Schreiber

  • Castration enhances expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein and sulfated glycoprotein-2 in the intact and lesion-altered hippocampus of the adult male rat.

    Jonathan R. Day;Nicholas J. Laping;Thomas H. McNeill;Steven S. Schreiber

  • Excitotoxic lesion of rat brain with quinolinic acid induces expression of p53 messenger RNA and protein and p53-inducible genes Bax and Gadd-45 in brain areas showing DNA fragmentation

    P.E. Hughes;T. Alexi;T. Yoshida;S.S. Schreiber

  • Selective neuronal vulnerability in the hippocampus--a role for gene expression?

    Steven S. Schreiber;Michel Baudry

  • Cycloheximide prevents kainate-induced neuronal death and c-fos expression in adult rat brain.

    Steven S. Schreiber;Georges Tocco;Imad Najm;Richard F. Thompson

  • Activation of immediate early genes after acute stress

    Steven S. Schreiber;Georges Tocco;Tracey J. Shors;Richard F. Thompson

  • Development of kainic acid and N-methyl-d-aspartic acid toxicity in organotypic hippocampal cultures

    Annadora J. Bruce;Shahin Sakhi;Steven S. Schreiber;Michel Baudry

  • Nuclear accumulation of p53 protein following kainic acid-induced seizures

    Shahin Sakhi;Ning Sun;Lauren L. Wing;Parula Mehta

  • Transforming Growth Factor-β Mediates Astrocyte-Specific Regulation of Brain Endothelial Anticoagulant Factors

    Nam D. Tran;Jorge Correale;Steven S. Schreiber;Mark Fisher

  • Hereditary deficiencies in complement C5 are associated with intensified neurodegenerative responses that implicate new roles for the C-system in neuronal and astrocytic functions

    G.M. Pasinetti;G. Tocco;S. Sakhi;W.D. Musleh

  • A role for the tumour suppressor gene p53 in regulating neuronal apoptosis.

    P E Hughes;T Alexi;S S Schreiber

  • Tumor suppressor p53 induction and DNA damage in hippocampal granule cells after adrenalectomy.

    Steven S. Schreiber;Shahin Sakhi;Millicent M. Dugich-Djordjevic;Nancy R. Nichols

  • Immunohistochemical localization of redox factor-1 (Ref-1) in Alzheimer's hippocampus

    Zhiqun Tan;Ning Sun;Steven S. Schreiber

  • Absence of c-fos induction in neonatal rat brain after seizures

    Steven S. Schreiber;Georges Tocco;Imad Najm;Caleb E. Finch

  • Sequence analysis of the nucleocapsid protein gene of human coronavirus 229E.

    Steven S. Schreiber;Toshio Kamahora;Michael M.C. Lai

  • Mutant ubiquitin found in Alzheimer’s disease causes neuritic beading of mitochondria in association with neuronal degeneration

    Z Tan;X Sun;F-S Hou;H-W Oh

Frequent Co-Authors

Michel Baudry
Michel Baudry Western University of Health Sciences
Imad Najm
Imad Najm Cleveland Clinic
Berislav V. Zlokovic
Berislav V. Zlokovic University of Southern California
Giulio Maria Pasinetti
Giulio Maria Pasinetti Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Claude G. Wasterlain
Claude G. Wasterlain University of California, Los Angeles
Don Shin
Don Shin University of California, Los Angeles
Richard F. Thompson
Richard F. Thompson University of Southern California
Caleb E. Finch
Caleb E. Finch University of Southern California
Xiaoning Bi
Xiaoning Bi College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific
Kim N. Green
Kim N. Green University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore Neuroscience studies in the USA, it's worth considering the evolving online education landscape and its impact on your career trajectory. Many students now opt for online accelerated programs that allow them to graduate sooner and enter the workforce faster, providing both flexibility and cost savings.

Choosing a degree that aligns with most valuable degree in the world considerations can lead to rewarding job prospects and financial stability. Neuroscience majors often intersect with disciplines identified on the list of which degrees make the most money, such as biomedical engineering, computer science, or psychology, opening doors to high-paying and in-demand roles.

If you're seeking affordable options, there are many best online colleges that accept fafsa, which can make pursuing a neuroscience or related degree accessible to more students. Whether your interest is in clinical research, healthcare, or tech-driven neuroscience careers, finding the right online pathway can set you up for future success.

Best Scientists Citing Steven S. Schreiber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles