World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
63
Citations
13731
World Ranking
2895
National Ranking
1264

Stephen P. Daiger publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen P. Daiger sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 231 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Stephen P. Daiger D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen P. Daiger sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Stephen P. Daiger is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on Medicine. Within these, their work involves several subfields including Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Epidemiology.

The main topics investigated by Stephen P. Daiger include retinal development and disorders, retinal diseases and treatments, RNA regulation and disease, advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques, cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research, genetic and kidney cyst diseases, and fetal and pediatric neurological disorders.

Throughout their career, Stephen P. Daiger has published research in several venues, most frequently appearing in Translational Vision Science & Technology, followed by bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), The American Journal of Human Genetics, Human Mutation, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Co-authorship is a significant aspect of their work. Frequent collaborators include David G. Birch, Jacque L. Duncan, Lori S. Sullivan, Kari Branham, and Kinga M. Bujakowska.

Some notable recent papers by Stephen P. Daiger include:

  • "Mutations in the Kinesin-2 Motor KIF3B Cause an Autosomal-Dominant Ciliopathy" (2020) published in The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • "Tissue-specific genotype-phenotype correlations among USH2A-related disorders in the RUSH2A study" (2022) published in Human Mutation
  • "Understanding the genetic architecture of human retinal degenerations" (2020) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Overcoming the Challenges to Clinical Development of X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa Therapies: Proceedings of an Expert Panel" (2023) published in Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • "De novo and inherited dominant variants in U4 and U6 snRNAs cause retinitis pigmentosa" (2025) published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Stephen P. Daiger has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 2014.

Best Publications

  • Genes and mutations causing retinitis pigmentosa

    Stephen P Daiger;Lori S Sullivan;Sara J Bowne

  • Perspective on Genes and Mutations Causing Retinitis Pigmentosa

    Stephen P. Daiger;Sara J. Bowne;Lori S. Sullivan

  • Group-specific component (Gc) proteins bind vitamin D and 25-hydroxyvitamin D

    Stephen P. Daiger;Mel S. Schanfield;L. L. Cavalli-Sforza

  • Apparent heterozygote deficiencies observed in DNA typing data and their implications in forensic applications.

    Ranajit Chakraborty;M. De Andrade;S. P. Daiger;Bruce Budowle

  • Prevalence of mutations causing retinitis pigmentosa and other inherited retinopathies

    Melanie M. Sohocki;Stephen P Daiger;Sara J Bowne;Joseph A. Rodriquez

  • A Range of Clinical Phenotypes Associated with Mutations in CRX, a Photoreceptor Transcription-Factor Gene

    Melanie M. Sohocki;Lori S. Sullivan;Helen A. Mintz-Hittner;David Birch

  • Mutations in a new photoreceptor-pineal gene on 17p cause Leber congenital amaurosis.

    Melanie M. Sohocki;Sara J. Bowne;Lori S. Sullivan;Seth Blackshaw

  • Prevalence of disease-causing mutations in families with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa: a screen of known genes in 200 families.

    Lori S. Sullivan;Sara J. Bowne;David G. Birch;Dianna Hughbanks-Wheaton

  • Autosomal Dominant Sectoral Retinitis Pigmentosa: Two Families With Transversion Mutation in Codon 23 of Rhodopsin

    John R. Heckenlively;Joseph A. Rodriguez;Stephen P. Daiger

  • Autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (ADRP): Localization of an ADRP gene to the long arm of chromosome 3

    Peter McWilliam;G.Jane Farrar;Paul Kenna;Daniel G. Bradley

  • Localization of two genes for Usher syndrome type I to chromosome 11.

    Richard J.H. Smith;Elizabeth C. Lee;William J. Kimberling;Stephen P. Daiger

  • Mutations in the inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 1 gene (IMPDH1) cause the RP10 form of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa

    Sara J. Bowne;Lori S. Sullivan;Susan H. Blanton;Constance L. Cepko

  • Next generation sequencing-based molecular diagnosis of retinitis pigmentosa: identification of a novel genotype-phenotype correlation and clinical refinements

    Feng Wang;Hui Wang;Han Fang Tuan;Duy H. Nguyen

  • Spectrum and frequency of mutations in IMPDH1 associated with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa and leber congenital amaurosis.

    Sara J. Bowne;Lori S. Sullivan;Sarah E. Mortimer;Lizbeth Hedstrom

  • Linkage mapping of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (RP1) to the pericentric region of human chromosome 8

    Susan Halloran Blanton;John R. Heckenlively;Anne W. Cottingham;Jackie Friedman

  • Inherited Retinal Degenerations: Current Landscape and Knowledge Gaps.

    Jacque L. Duncan;Eric A. Pierce;Amy M. Laster;Stephen P. Daiger

  • Prevalence of AIPL1 mutations in inherited retinal degenerative disease

    Melanie M. Sohocki;Isabelle Perrault;Bart P. Leroy;Bart P. Leroy;Annette M. Payne

  • Autosomal-dominant retinitis pigmentosa caused by a mutation in SNRNP200, a gene required for unwinding of U4/U6 snRNAs.

    Chen Zhao;Chen Zhao;Deepti L. Bellur;Shasha Lu;Shasha Lu;Feng Zhao

  • Mutations in a novel retina-specific gene cause autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa

    Lori S. Sullivan;John R. Heckenlively;Sara J. Bowne;Jian Zuo

  • Mutations in a novel photoreceptor-pineal gene on 17P cause leber congenital amaurosis (LCA4)

    Melanie M. Sohocki;Stephen P. Daiger

Frequent Co-Authors

David G. Birch
David G. Birch The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
John R. Heckenlively
John R. Heckenlively University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Susan H. Blanton
Susan H. Blanton University of Miami
Peter Humphries
Peter Humphries Trinity College Dublin
Eric A. Pierce
Eric A. Pierce Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Rui Chen
Rui Chen Capital Medical University
George M. Weinstock
George M. Weinstock The Jackson Laboratory
Daniel C. Koboldt
Daniel C. Koboldt The Ohio State University
Robert S. Fulton
Robert S. Fulton Washington University in St. Louis
Edwin M. Stone
Edwin M. Stone University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics opens doors to a wide variety of online degrees and healthcare career pathways. For those seeking patient-focused roles, consider nursing programs that eliminate common hurdles. For example, you do not always have to take the teas test to get into nursing school, thanks to flexible admission requirements at select institutions.

If your interest lies in healthcare leadership or administration, pursuing one of the cheapest online mha programs can provide a cost-effective path to advanced credentials and management roles. Seeking to enter the workforce quickly? fast track medical programs, like online Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) courses, offer accelerated training to help you start your career sooner.

For those aspiring to academic or advanced clinical careers, an online phd in nursing can expand your research, teaching, or leadership prospects. As genetics increasingly intersects with healthcare, these online degrees can help you combine specialized science knowledge with practical, in-demand skills.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen P. Daiger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles