World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
2753
World Ranking
11248
National Ranking
549

Stephan Getzmann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan Getzmann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 142 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephan Getzmann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan Getzmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Unmasking selective path integration deficits in Alzheimer’s disease risk carriers

    Anne Bierbrauer;Lukas Kunz;Carlos A. Gomes;Maike Luhmann

  • Effects of natural versus artificial spatial cues on electrophysiological correlates of auditory motion.

    Stephan Getzmann;Jörg Lewald

  • Frontal and parietal EEG alpha asymmetry: a large-scale investigation of short-term reliability on distinct EEG systems.

    Dorothea Metzen;Erhan Genç;Stephan Getzmann;Mauro F. Larra

  • Does age increase auditory distraction? Electrophysiological correlates of high and low performance in seniors.

    Stephan Getzmann;Patrick D. Gajewski;Michael Falkenstein

  • Representational momentum in spatial hearing.

    Stephan Getzmann;Jörg Lewald;Rainer Guski

  • Horizontal and vertical effects of eye-position on sound localization.

    Jörg Lewald;Stephan Getzmann

  • The ability of young, middle-aged and older drivers to inhibit visual and auditory distraction in a driving simulator task

    Melanie Karthaus;Edmund Wascher;Michael Falkenstein;Stephan Getzmann

  • Impact of Biological and Lifestyle Factors on Cognitive Aging and Work Ability in the Dortmund Vital Study: Protocol of an Interdisciplinary, Cross-sectional, and Longitudinal Study

    Unknown

  • BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and goal-directed behavior in healthy elderly — evidence from auditory distraction

    Stephan Getzmann;Patrick D. Gajewski;Jan G. Hengstler;Michael Falkenstein

  • Switching of auditory attention in “cocktail-party” listening: ERP evidence of cueing effects in younger and older adults

    Stephan Getzmann;Julian Jasny;Michael Falkenstein

  • Effect of auditory motion velocity on reaction time and cortical processes

    Unknown

  • The Effect of Brief Auditory Stimuli on Visual Apparent Motion

    Unknown

  • Latent Toxoplasma gondii infection leads to deficits in goal-directed behavior in healthy elderly

    Christian Beste;Stephan Getzmann;Patrick D. Gajewski;Klaus Golka

  • Neuroergonomics on the Go: An Evaluation of the Potential of Mobile EEG for Workplace Assessment and Design:

    Edmund Wascher;Julian Reiser;Gerhard Rinkenauer;Mauro Larrá

  • Eye-blinks in choice response tasks uncover hidden aspects of information processing.

    Edmund Wascher;Holger Heppner;Tina Möckel;Sven Oliver Kobald

  • On the neural mechanisms underlying the protective function of retroactive cuing against perceptual interference: Evidence by event-related potentials of the EEG.

    Daniel Schneider;Anna Barth;Stephan Getzmann;Edmund Wascher

  • Focused and divided attention in a simulated cocktail-party situation: ERP evidence from younger and older adults.

    Stephan Getzmann;Edward J. Golob;Edmund Wascher

  • Driver state examination—Treading new paths

    Edmund Wascher;Stephan Getzmann;Melanie Karthaus

  • The role of inhibition for working memory processes: ERP evidence from a short-term storage task.

    Stephan Getzmann;Edmund Wascher;Daniel Schneider

  • Effects of Visual and Acoustic Distraction on Driving Behavior and EEG in Young and Older Car Drivers: A Driving Simulation Study.

    Melanie Karthaus;Edmund Wascher;Stephan Getzmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Edmund Wascher
Edmund Wascher TU Dortmund University
Michael Falkenstein
Michael Falkenstein TU Dortmund University
Jörg Lewald
Jörg Lewald Ruhr University Bochum
Jan G. Hengstler
Jan G. Hengstler TU Dortmund University
Nikolai Axmacher
Nikolai Axmacher Ruhr University Bochum
Risto Näätänen
Risto Näätänen University of Tartu
Bryan A. Strange
Bryan A. Strange Technical University of Madrid
Mercedes Atienza
Mercedes Atienza Pablo de Olavide University
Maike Luhmann
Maike Luhmann Ruhr University Bochum

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Stephan Getzmann

Recently Published Articles