World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Solomon Tesfamariam

Solomon Tesfamariam

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 48 4530 4359 188 179 256 9695

Solomon Tesfamariam publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Solomon Tesfamariam between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Solomon Tesfamariam published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 13.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2023. 20 of the 318 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2023. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 19 publications 2026: 1 publication
2004 2026

318 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Solomon Tesfamariam: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 4
2007 4
2008 5
2009 3
2010 5
2011 9
2012 16
2013 11
2014 18
2015 27
2016 19
2017 15
2018 19
2019 24
2020 14
2021 26
2022 27
2023 28
2024 23
2025 19
2026 1
Total 318
Download as CSV

Solomon Tesfamariam publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Solomon Tesfamariam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 248–257 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 256 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280 256
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Solomon Tesfamariam D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Solomon Tesfamariam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271 48
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Solomon Tesfamariam is affiliated with the University of Waterloo in Canada. Their research primarily spans the field of Engineering, with significant contributions to subfields such as Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Building and Construction, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's work covers a broad range of topics related to structural and seismic performance and reliability. Major themes in their research include:

  • Seismic Performance and Analysis
  • Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
  • Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
  • Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
  • Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis

Frequent publication venues for Tesfamariam's work include:

  • Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
  • Engineering Structures
  • Journal of Building Engineering
  • Journal of Structural Engineering
  • Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Solomon Tesfamariam include:

  • "Quantifying restoration time of power and telecommunication lifelines after earthquakes using Bayesian belief network model," 2020, Reliability Engineering & System Safety
  • "Reliability assessment of stochastic dynamical systems using physics informed neural network based PDEM," 2023, Reliability Engineering & System Safety
  • "Spatio-temporal analysis of urban heat island (UHI) and its effect on urban ecology: The case of Mekelle city, Northern Ethiopia," 2023, Heliyon
  • "Robust design optimization for SMA based nonlinear energy sink with negative stiffness and friction," 2020, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
  • "Subset simulation based approach for space-time-dependent system reliability analysis of corroding pipelines," 2021, Structural Safety

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Tesfamariam include:

  • Sourav Das
  • Ruizhao Zhu
  • Tong Guo
  • Haile Woldesellasse
  • Biniam Tekle Teweldebrhan

Best Publications

  • A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management

    Golam Kabir;Rehan Sadiq;Solomon Tesfamariam

  • Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: A sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis

    Anjuman Shahriar;Rehan Sadiq;Solomon Tesfamariam

  • Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP)

    Solomon Tesfamariam;Rehan Sadiq

  • Evaluating risk of water mains failure using a Bayesian belief network model

    Golam Kabir;Solomon Tesfamariam;Alex Francisque;Rehan Sadiq

  • Environmental decision-making under uncertainty using intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IF-AHP)

    Rehan Sadiq;Solomon Tesfamariam

  • A survey of non-gradient optimization methods in structural engineering

    Warren Hare;Julie Nutini;Solomon Tesfamariam

  • A fuzzy Bayesian belief network for safety assessment of oil and gas pipelines

    Golam Kabir;Rehan Sadiq;Solomon Tesfamariam

  • Modelling of masonry infilled RC frames subjected to cyclic loads: State of the art review and modelling with OpenSees

    Nurbaiah Mohammad Noh;Laura Liberatore;Fabrizio Mollaioli;Solomon Tesfamariam

  • Assessing urban areas vulnerability to pluvial flooding using GIS applications and Bayesian Belief Network model

    Yekenalem Abebe;Golam Kabir;Solomon Tesfamariam

  • Constrained multi-objective optimization algorithms: Review and comparison with application in reinforced concrete structures

    Hamid Afshari;Warren L. Hare;Solomon Tesfamariam

  • Risk analysis in a linguistic environment: A fuzzy evidential reasoning-based approach

    Yong Deng;Rehan Sadiq;Wen Jiang;Solomon Tesfamariam

  • Hysteresis behavior of bracket connection in cross-laminated-timber shear walls

    Yin-Lan Shen;Yin-Lan Shen;Johannes Schneider;Solomon Tesfamariam;Siegfried F. Stiemer

  • Probability density functions based weights for ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operators: An example of water quality indices

    Rehan Sadiq;Solomon Tesfamariam

  • Internal corrosion hazard assessment of oil & gas pipelines using Bayesian belief network model

    Oleg Shabarchin;Solomon Tesfamariam

  • Seismic fragilities for reinforced concrete buildings with consideration of irregularities

    Pathmanathan Rajeev;S Tesfamariam

  • Seismic fragilities of non-ductile reinforced concrete frames with consideration of soil structure interaction

    Pathmanathan Rajeev;S Tesfamariam

  • Uncoupled axial, flexural, and circumferential pipe-soil interaction analyses of partially supported jointed water mains

    Balvant Rajani;Solomon Tesfamariam

  • Risk-Based Seismic Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings

    Solomon Tesfamariam;Murat Saatcioglu

  • Earthquake induced damage classification for reinforced concrete buildings

    Solomon Tesfamariam;Zheng Liu

  • Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using Hierarchical Fuzzy Rule Base Modeling

    Solomon Tesfamariam;Murat Saatcioglu

  • Handbook of Seismic Risk Analysis and Management of Civil Infrastructure Systems

    S Tesfamariam;Katsu Goda

Frequent Co-Authors

Rehan Sadiq
Rehan Sadiq University of British Columbia
Katsuichiro Goda
Katsuichiro Goda University of Western Ontario
Girma Bitsuamlak
Girma Bitsuamlak University of Western Ontario
Gian Paolo Cimellaro
Gian Paolo Cimellaro Polytechnic University of Turin
Zheng Liu
Zheng Liu University of British Columbia
M. Shahria Alam
M. Shahria Alam University of British Columbia
Thomas Tannert
Thomas Tannert University of Northern British Columbia
Murat Saatcioglu
Murat Saatcioglu University of Ottawa
Abbas S. Milani
Abbas S. Milani University of British Columbia
Izuru Takewaki
Izuru Takewaki Kyoto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and technology skills open doors to a wide variety of career opportunities. Many successful professionals choose to expand their expertise and career prospects by studying related fields online. These pathways can complement an engineering background or support transitions into managerial and administrative roles.

For example, mastering essential business financial skills is possible with bookkeeping courses, which are ideal for engineers interested in project management or entrepreneurship. If you’re aiming to build strong administrative skills to support technical teams, an office administration degree online could be a strategic choice.

Many engineers and technology specialists pursue a business administration online degree to unlock leadership roles or broaden their career horizons. Meanwhile, those who aspire to lead organizations or manage innovation may consider a masters in organizational leadership online. Combining technical expertise with business and leadership knowledge can make you highly competitive in today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Solomon Tesfamariam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles