World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Chemistry
Israel
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
103
Citations
39945
World Ranking
1110
National Ranking
9

Jan M. L. Martin publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan M. L. Martin sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 371 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Jan M. L. Martin D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan M. L. Martin sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Chemistry in Israel Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Chemistry in Israel Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Chemistry in Israel Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Chemistry in Israel Leader Award

Overview

Jan M. L. Martin is affiliated with the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel. Their research spans multiple fields primarily within Physics and Astronomy as well as Chemistry, with substantial contributions in subfields such as Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Spectroscopy, and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry.

Their scholarly output includes a number of recent papers across respected journals. Notable publications include: "The Atomic Partial Charges Arboretum: Trying to See the Forest for the Trees" (2020, ChemPhysChem), "What Types of Chemical Problems Benefit from Density-Corrected DFT? A Probe Using an Extensive and Chemically Diverse Test Suite" (2021, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation), "The MOBH35 Metal-Organic Barrier Heights Reconsidered: Performance of Local-Orbital Coupled Cluster Approaches in Different Static Correlation Regimes" (2022, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation), "Exploring Avenues beyond Revised DSD Functionals: I. Range Separation, with xDSD as a Special Case" (2021, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A), and "Performance of Localized Coupled Cluster Methods in a Moderately Strong Correlation Regime: Hückel-Möbius Interconversions in Expanded Porphyrins" (2020, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation).

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Jan M. L. Martin include:

  • Emmanouil Semidalas
  • Golokesh Santra
  • Nisha Mehta
  • Vladimir Fishman
  • Nitai Sylvetsky

The researcher's work has been commonly published in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
  • AIP conference proceedings

Jan M. L. Martin's investigations cover a variety of major research topics, with particular emphasis on:

  • Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
  • Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
  • Crystallography and molecular interactions
  • Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
  • Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications

Best Publications

  • Development of density functionals for thermochemical kinetics

    A. Daniel Boese;Jan M. L. Martin

  • Development of Novel Density Functionals for Thermochemical Kinetics

    A. Daniel Boese;Jan M. L. Martin

  • Correlation consistent valence basis sets for use with the Stuttgart–Dresden–Bonn relativistic effective core potentials: The atoms Ga–Kr and In–Xe

    Jan M. L. Martin;Andreas Sundermann

  • TOWARDS STANDARD METHODS FOR BENCHMARK QUALITY AB INITIO THERMOCHEMISTRY :W1 AND W2 THEORY

    Jan M. L. Martin;Glênisson de Oliveira

  • Highly accurate first-principles benchmark data sets for the parametrization and validation of density functional and other approximate methods. Derivation of a robust, generally applicable, double-hybrid functional for thermochemistry and thermochemical kinetics.

    Amir Karton;Alex Tarnopolsky;Jean François Lamère;George C. Schatz

  • Ab initio total atomization energies of small molecules — towards the basis set limit

    Jan M.L. Martin

  • W4 theory for computational thermochemistry: In pursuit of confident sub-kJ/mol predictions

    Amir Karton;Elena Rabinovich;Jan M. L. Martin;Branko Ruscic

  • Exploring the Accuracy Limits of Local Pair Natural Orbital Coupled-Cluster Theory

    Dimitrios G. Liakos;Manuel Sparta;Manoj K. Kesharwani;Jan M. L. Martin

  • “Turning Over” Definitions in Catalytic Cycles

    Sebastian Kozuch;Jan M. L. Martin;Jan M. L. Martin

  • Frequency and zero-point vibrational energy scale factors for double-hybrid density functionals (and other selected methods): can anharmonic force fields be avoided?

    Manoj K. Kesharwani;Brina Brauer;Jan M. L. Martin

  • Halogen Bonds: Benchmarks and Theoretical Analysis

    Sebastian Kozuch;Jan M. L. Martin

  • DSD-PBEP86: in search of the best double-hybrid DFT with spin-component scaled MP2 and dispersion corrections

    Sebastian Kozuch;Jan M. L. Martin;Jan M. L. Martin

  • Assessment of W1 and W2 theories for the computation of electron affinities, ionization potentials, heats of formation, and proton affinities

    Srinivasan Parthiban;Jan M. L. Martin

  • W3 theory: robust computational thermochemistry in the kJ/mol accuracy range.

    A. Daniel Boese;Mikhal Oren;Onur Atasoylu;Jan M. L. Martin

  • W4-11: A high-confidence benchmark dataset for computational thermochemistry derived from first-principles W4 data

    Amir Karton;Shauli Daon;Jan M.L. Martin

  • The anharmonic force field of ethylene, C2H4, by means of accurate ab initio calculations

    Jan M. L. Martin;Timothy J. Lee;Peter R. Taylor;Jean‐Pierre François

  • Minimally Empirical Double-Hybrid Functionals Trained against the GMTKN55 Database: revDSD-PBEP86-D4, revDOD-PBE-D4, and DOD-SCAN-D4.

    Golokesh Santra;Nitai Sylvetsky;Jan M L Martin

  • Spin-component-scaled double hybrids: An extensive search for the best fifth-rung functionals blending DFT and perturbation theory.

    Sebastian Kozuch;Jan M. L. Martin

  • DSD-BLYP: A General Purpose Double Hybrid Density Functional Including Spin Component Scaling and Dispersion Correction

    Sebastian Kozuch;David Gruzman;Jan M. L. Martin

  • Comment on: “Estimating the Hartree–Fock limit from finite basis set calculations” [Jensen F (2005) Theor Chem Acc 113:267]

    Amir Karton;Jan M. L. Martin

  • IUPAC Critical Evaluation of Thermochemical Properties of Selected Radicals. Part I

    Branko Ruscic;James E. Boggs;Alexander Burcat;Attila G. Császár

Frequent Co-Authors

Amir Karton
Amir Karton University of New England
Renaat Gijbels
Renaat Gijbels University of Antwerp
Peter R. Taylor
Peter R. Taylor Tianjin University
David Milstein
David Milstein Weizmann Institute of Science
Timothy J. Lee
Timothy J. Lee Ames Research Center
Linda J. W. Shimon
Linda J. W. Shimon Weizmann Institute of Science
Milko E. van der Boom
Milko E. van der Boom Weizmann Institute of Science
Yehoshoa Ben-David
Yehoshoa Ben-David Weizmann Institute of Science
Gregory Leitus
Gregory Leitus Weizmann Institute of Science
Frank De Proft
Frank De Proft Vrije Universiteit Brussel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a chemistry degree in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees and career paths. Many students explore associate degrees that complement their chemistry background. For those interested in law-related fields, understanding the best online associate degree programs in criminal justice can be beneficial, especially if they aim to enter regulatory or compliance roles in chemical industries.

Cost is a significant factor in choosing a degree program. Prospective students should consider how much does a criminal justice degree cost to weigh the investment versus potential career outcomes, particularly when branching into interdisciplinary fields involving chemistry and law enforcement.

For those interested in legal support careers, exploring degrees for paralegals can provide insight into paths that combine legal knowledge with scientific expertise, opening roles in patent law or environmental regulation.

Chemistry graduates may also consider roles in the pharmaceutical industry. Learning how much do drug reps make can guide decisions about entering pharmaceutical sales, which often values scientific background and communication skills.

Best Scientists Citing Jan M. L. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles