World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Chemistry
Israel
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 103 1110 978 9 9 371 39945

Jan M. L. Martin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan M. L. Martin between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan M. L. Martin published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 1996. 22 of the 421 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 1996. 1989: 11 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 15 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 15 publications 1996: 22 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 17 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 10 publications
1989 2025

421 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan M. L. Martin: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 11
1990 9
1991 7
1992 8
1993 15
1994 12
1995 15
1996 22
1997 11
1998 17
1999 17
2000 9
2001 15
2002 7
2003 15
2004 10
2005 11
2006 9
2007 14
2008 9
2009 10
2010 9
2011 6
2012 7
2013 9
2014 7
2015 5
2016 7
2017 8
2018 8
2019 8
2020 10
2021 21
2022 21
2023 20
2024 12
2025 10
Total 421
Download as CSV

Jan M. L. Martin publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan M. L. Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 371 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522 371
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan M. L. Martin D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan M. L. Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105 103
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Chemistry in Israel Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Chemistry in Israel Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Chemistry in Israel Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Chemistry in Israel Leader Award

Overview

Jan M. L. Martin is affiliated with the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel. Their research spans multiple fields primarily within Physics and Astronomy as well as Chemistry, with substantial contributions in subfields such as Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Spectroscopy, and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry.

Their scholarly output includes a number of recent papers across respected journals. Notable publications include: "The Atomic Partial Charges Arboretum: Trying to See the Forest for the Trees" (2020, ChemPhysChem), "What Types of Chemical Problems Benefit from Density-Corrected DFT? A Probe Using an Extensive and Chemically Diverse Test Suite" (2021, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation), "The MOBH35 Metal-Organic Barrier Heights Reconsidered: Performance of Local-Orbital Coupled Cluster Approaches in Different Static Correlation Regimes" (2022, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation), "Exploring Avenues beyond Revised DSD Functionals: I. Range Separation, with xDSD as a Special Case" (2021, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A), and "Performance of Localized Coupled Cluster Methods in a Moderately Strong Correlation Regime: Hückel-Möbius Interconversions in Expanded Porphyrins" (2020, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation).

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Jan M. L. Martin include:

  • Emmanouil Semidalas
  • Golokesh Santra
  • Nisha Mehta
  • Vladimir Fishman
  • Nitai Sylvetsky

The researcher's work has been commonly published in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
  • AIP conference proceedings

Jan M. L. Martin's investigations cover a variety of major research topics, with particular emphasis on:

  • Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
  • Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
  • Crystallography and molecular interactions
  • Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
  • Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications

Best Publications

  • Development of density functionals for thermochemical kinetics

    A. Daniel Boese;Jan M. L. Martin

  • Development of Novel Density Functionals for Thermochemical Kinetics

    A. Daniel Boese;Jan M. L. Martin

  • Correlation consistent valence basis sets for use with the Stuttgart–Dresden–Bonn relativistic effective core potentials: The atoms Ga–Kr and In–Xe

    Jan M. L. Martin;Andreas Sundermann

  • TOWARDS STANDARD METHODS FOR BENCHMARK QUALITY AB INITIO THERMOCHEMISTRY :W1 AND W2 THEORY

    Jan M. L. Martin;Glênisson de Oliveira

  • Highly accurate first-principles benchmark data sets for the parametrization and validation of density functional and other approximate methods. Derivation of a robust, generally applicable, double-hybrid functional for thermochemistry and thermochemical kinetics.

    Amir Karton;Alex Tarnopolsky;Jean François Lamère;George C. Schatz

  • Ab initio total atomization energies of small molecules — towards the basis set limit

    Jan M.L. Martin

  • W4 theory for computational thermochemistry: In pursuit of confident sub-kJ/mol predictions

    Amir Karton;Elena Rabinovich;Jan M. L. Martin;Branko Ruscic

  • Exploring the Accuracy Limits of Local Pair Natural Orbital Coupled-Cluster Theory

    Dimitrios G. Liakos;Manuel Sparta;Manoj K. Kesharwani;Jan M. L. Martin

  • “Turning Over” Definitions in Catalytic Cycles

    Sebastian Kozuch;Jan M. L. Martin;Jan M. L. Martin

  • Frequency and zero-point vibrational energy scale factors for double-hybrid density functionals (and other selected methods): can anharmonic force fields be avoided?

    Manoj K. Kesharwani;Brina Brauer;Jan M. L. Martin

  • Halogen Bonds: Benchmarks and Theoretical Analysis

    Sebastian Kozuch;Jan M. L. Martin

  • DSD-PBEP86: in search of the best double-hybrid DFT with spin-component scaled MP2 and dispersion corrections

    Sebastian Kozuch;Jan M. L. Martin;Jan M. L. Martin

  • Assessment of W1 and W2 theories for the computation of electron affinities, ionization potentials, heats of formation, and proton affinities

    Srinivasan Parthiban;Jan M. L. Martin

  • W3 theory: robust computational thermochemistry in the kJ/mol accuracy range.

    A. Daniel Boese;Mikhal Oren;Onur Atasoylu;Jan M. L. Martin

  • W4-11: A high-confidence benchmark dataset for computational thermochemistry derived from first-principles W4 data

    Amir Karton;Shauli Daon;Jan M.L. Martin

  • The anharmonic force field of ethylene, C2H4, by means of accurate ab initio calculations

    Jan M. L. Martin;Timothy J. Lee;Peter R. Taylor;Jean‐Pierre François

  • Minimally Empirical Double-Hybrid Functionals Trained against the GMTKN55 Database: revDSD-PBEP86-D4, revDOD-PBE-D4, and DOD-SCAN-D4.

    Golokesh Santra;Nitai Sylvetsky;Jan M L Martin

  • Spin-component-scaled double hybrids: An extensive search for the best fifth-rung functionals blending DFT and perturbation theory.

    Sebastian Kozuch;Jan M. L. Martin

  • DSD-BLYP: A General Purpose Double Hybrid Density Functional Including Spin Component Scaling and Dispersion Correction

    Sebastian Kozuch;David Gruzman;Jan M. L. Martin

  • Comment on: “Estimating the Hartree–Fock limit from finite basis set calculations” [Jensen F (2005) Theor Chem Acc 113:267]

    Amir Karton;Jan M. L. Martin

  • IUPAC Critical Evaluation of Thermochemical Properties of Selected Radicals. Part I

    Branko Ruscic;James E. Boggs;Alexander Burcat;Attila G. Császár

Frequent Co-Authors

Amir Karton
Amir Karton University of New England
Renaat Gijbels
Renaat Gijbels University of Antwerp
Peter R. Taylor
Peter R. Taylor Tianjin University
David Milstein
David Milstein Weizmann Institute of Science
Timothy J. Lee
Timothy J. Lee Ames Research Center
Linda J. W. Shimon
Linda J. W. Shimon Weizmann Institute of Science
Milko E. van der Boom
Milko E. van der Boom Weizmann Institute of Science
Yehoshoa Ben-David
Yehoshoa Ben-David Weizmann Institute of Science
Gregory Leitus
Gregory Leitus Weizmann Institute of Science
Frank De Proft
Frank De Proft Vrije Universiteit Brussel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a chemistry degree in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees and career paths. Many students explore associate degrees that complement their chemistry background. For those interested in law-related fields, understanding the best online associate degree programs in criminal justice can be beneficial, especially if they aim to enter regulatory or compliance roles in chemical industries.

Cost is a significant factor in choosing a degree program. Prospective students should consider how much does a criminal justice degree cost to weigh the investment versus potential career outcomes, particularly when branching into interdisciplinary fields involving chemistry and law enforcement.

For those interested in legal support careers, exploring degrees for paralegals can provide insight into paths that combine legal knowledge with scientific expertise, opening roles in patent law or environmental regulation.

Chemistry graduates may also consider roles in the pharmaceutical industry. Learning how much do drug reps make can guide decisions about entering pharmaceutical sales, which often values scientific background and communication skills.

Best Scientists Citing Jan M. L. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles