World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 37 779 777 258 258 106 3911
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 5144 4774 78 77 106 5102

Shulin Yu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shulin Yu between 2013 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shulin Yu published across 13 years, from 2013 to 2025, averaging 12.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2024. 48 of the 158 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2013 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2024. 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 32 publications 2025: 16 publications
2013 2025

158 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shulin Yu: publications per year, 2013 to 2025
Year Publications
2013 2
2014 1
2015 4
2016 7
2017 6
2018 14
2019 11
2020 15
2021 20
2022 12
2023 18
2024 32
2025 16
Total 158
Download as CSV

Shulin Yu publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shulin Yu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 104–113 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 106 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406 106
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Shulin Yu D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shulin Yu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Shulin Yu is affiliated with the University of Macau in China and works primarily in the fields of Arts and Humanities and Social Sciences. Their scholarly focus encompasses several subfields, including Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Social Psychology.

The core topics of Shulin Yu's research include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning, Student Assessment and Feedback, Second Language Learning and Teaching, Discourse Analysis in Language Studies, Reflective Practices in Education, Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, and Educational and Psychological Assessments.

Their recent papers cover a range of issues related to academic writing and feedback literacy, motivational factors in writing for EFL learners, peer feedback dynamics, and automated feedback in L2 writing environments. Notable works include:

  • Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-based framework (2021), published in Assessing Writing
  • Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students' writing motivation and engagement in Chinese EFL context: A large scale study (2020), published in Assessing Writing
  • Giving genre-based peer feedback in academic writing: sources of knowledge and skills, difficulties and challenges (2020), published in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Shulin Yu has also contributed to scholarly books published by Cambridge University Press and Springer International Publishing, including titles such as Peer Assessment in Writing Instruction (2024) and Understanding the Emotions of Second Language Writing Teachers (2024).

Their frequent collaborators include Lianjiang Jiang, Feng Geng, Chunhong Liu, Yao Zheng, and Nan Zhou. This network reflects a collaborative research approach within the domain of language education and writing assessment.

Shulin Yu's research is dispersed across multiple academic venues, with repeated contributions to journals such as:

  • Language Teaching Research
  • Assessing Writing
  • Journal of Second Language Writing
  • European Journal of Education
  • System

Best Publications

  • Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students

    Yao Zheng;Yao Zheng;Shulin Yu

  • Peer Feedback in Second Language Writing (2005-2014).

    Shulin Yu;Icy Lee

  • Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice

    Peng Wu;Shulin Yu

  • Understanding EFL students’ participation in group peer feedback of L2 writing: A case study from an activity theory perspective

    Shulin Yu;Icy Lee

  • An analysis of Chinese EFL students’ use of first and second language in peer feedback of L2 writing

    Shulin Yu;Icy Lee

  • Understanding university students’ peer feedback practices in EFL writing: Insights from a case study

    Shulin Yu;Guangwei Hu

  • Exploring Chinese students' strategy use in a cooperative peer feedback writing group

    Shulin Yu;Icy Lee

  • Understanding student engagement with peer feedback on master’s theses: a Macau study

    Shulin Yu;Yiran Zhang;Yao Zheng;Kaihao Yuan

  • Evaluating student motivation and engagement in the Chinese EFL writing context

    Shulin Yu;Nan Zhou;Nan Zhou;Yao Zheng;Limin Zhang

  • Hong Kong Secondary Students’ Motivation in EFL Writing: A Survey Study

    Icy Lee;Shulin Yu;Yuan Liu

  • What Impedes the Development of Professional Learning Communities in China? Perceptions from Leaders and Frontline Teachers in Three Schools in Shanghai.

    Jia Zhang;Rui Yuan;Shulin Yu

  • Can higher-proficiency L2 learners benefit from working with lower-proficiency partners in peer feedback?

    Shulin Yu;Guangwei Hu

  • A longitudinal case study of changes in students’ attitudes, participation, and learning in collaborative writing

    Wenting Chen;Shulin Yu

  • Academic identities and university faculty responses to new managerialist reforms: experiences from China

    Yating Huang;Sun-Keung Pang;Shulin Yu

  • A Review of Research on Professional Learning Communities in Mainland China (2006-2015): Key Findings and Emerging Themes.

    Xuefeng Qiao;Shulin Yu;Limin Zhang

  • Giving Genre-Based Peer Feedback in Academic Writing: Sources of Knowledge and Skills, Difficulties and Challenges.

    Shulin Yu

  • Learning from giving peer feedback on postgraduate theses: Voices from Master's students in the Macau EFL context

    Shulin Yu

Frequent Co-Authors

Icy Lee
Icy Lee Chinese University of Hong Kong
Timothy Teo
Timothy Teo Chinese University of Hong Kong
Xiaoyi Fang
Xiaoyi Fang Beijing Normal University
Guangwei Hu
Guangwei Hu Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Cheryl Buehler
Cheryl Buehler University of North Carolina at Greensboro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for professionals in Social Sciences and Humanities fields is growing, and many students are seeking flexible educational options that fit their schedules. Online degrees offer convenience and accessibility for those interested in making a difference through social work, psychology, or counseling.

For students wanting to enter the workforce quickly, there are accelerated social work degree programs available online, enabling completion in less time than traditional pathways. Similarly, those passionate about understanding human behavior can pursue an accelerated online bachelor's degree in psychology, ideal for launching careers in counseling, education, or social services.

Students aiming to become licensed mental health counselors should consider cacrep accredited programs online to ensure their credentials meet national standards. For those interested in supporting families and couples, a variety of online marriage and family therapy masters programs provide specialized training to address complex relationship dynamics.

With so many online degree paths, students can select programs that best match their career goals, budgets, and timelines, creating countless opportunities within the Social Sciences and Humanities sector.

Best Scientists Citing Shulin Yu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles