World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter M. T. Deen

Peter M. T. Deen

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
66
Citations
15100
World Ranking
8704
National Ranking
228

Peter M. T. Deen publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. T. Deen sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 206 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Peter M. T. Deen D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. T. Deen sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter M. T. Deen is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research spans across multiple fields within medicine and the biological sciences, focusing notably on molecular biology and cancer research. The subfields of their work include molecular biology, cancer research, infectious diseases, surgery, and neurology.

The main topics covered in their research involve adrenal and paraganglionic tumors, cancer, hypoxia, and metabolism. They also investigate retinal development and disorders, retinal diseases and treatments, electrolyte and hormonal disorders, as well as SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 related research. Additionally, they have done work related to animal testing and alternatives.

Peter M. T. Deen has frequently published in several scientific venues. These include:

  • Current Biology
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Communications Biology
  • Experimental Eye Research
  • Endocrine Related Cancer

Their recent papers exemplify the diversity of their interests and contributions. Notable publications include:

  • How the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the necessity of animal research (2020, Current Biology)
  • Succinate Mediates Tumorigenic Effects via Succinate Receptor 1: Potential for New Targeted Treatment Strategies in Succinate Dehydrogenase Deficient Paragangliomas (2021, Frontiers in Endocrinology)
  • Differential day-night expression of tight junction components in murine retinal pigment epithelium (2020, Experimental Eye Research)
  • Loss of sdhb in zebrafish larvae recapitulates human paraganglioma characteristics (2020, Endocrine Related Cancer)
  • MicroRNA-132 regulates salt-dependent steady-state renin levels in mice (2020, Communications Biology)

They collaborate regularly with several coauthors, indicating ongoing research partnerships. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Elja Louer
  • Claudia Carmone
  • Anneke I. den Hollander
  • Lisa Genzel
  • Roger A.H. Adan

Best Publications

  • mTOR- and HIF-1α–mediated aerobic glycolysis as metabolic basis for trained immunity

    Shih-Chin Cheng;Jessica Quintin;Robert A. Cramer;Kelly M. Shepardson

  • Requirement of human renal water channel aquaporin-2 for vasopressin-dependent concentration of urine.

    P. M. T. Deen;M. A. J. Verdijk;N. V. A. M. Knoers;B. Wieringa

  • Physiology and pathophysiology of the vasopressin-regulated renal water reabsorption.

    Michelle Boone;Peter M. T. Deen

  • An aquaporin-2 water channel mutant which causes autosomal dominant nephrogenic diabetes insipidus is retained in the Golgi complex.

    S. M. Mulders;D. G. Bichet;J. P. L. Rijss;E.-J. Kamsteeg

  • Collecting Duct Principal Cell Transport Processes and Their Regulation

    David Pearce;Rama Soundararajan;Christiane Trimpert;Ossama B. Kashlan

  • Water channels encoded by mutant aquaporin-2 genes in nephrogenic diabetes insipidus are impaired in their cellular routing.

    P.M.T. Deen;H.J.E. Croes;R.A.M.H. van Aubel;L.A. Ginsel

  • A study in male and female 5-HT transporter knockout rats: an animal model for anxiety and depression disorders.

    Jocelien Olivier;M G C Van Der Hart;R P L Van Swelm;P J Dederen

  • Water Channel Properties of Major Intrinsic Protein of Lens

    S.M. Mulders;G.M. Preston;P.M.T. Deen;W.B. Guggino

  • The role of putative phosphorylation sites in the targeting and shuttling of the aquaporin-2 water channel.

    Bas W.M. van Balkom;Paul J.M. Savelkoul;Daniel Markovich;Erik Hofman

  • Short-chain ubiquitination mediates the regulated endocytosis of the aquaporin-2 water channel

    Erik-Jan Kamsteeg;Giel Hendriks;Michelle Boone;Irene B. M. Konings

  • An impaired routing of wild-type aquaporin-2 after tetramerization with an aquaporin-2 mutant explains dominant nephrogenic diabetes insipidus.

    Erik Jan Kamsteeg;Thera A.M. Wormhoudt;Johan P.L. Rijss;Carel H. Van Os

  • The human AQP4 gene: definition of the locus encoding two water channel polypeptides in brain.

    Mingqi Lu;M.D. Lee;B.L. Smith;J.S. Jung

  • The Succinate Receptor as a Novel Therapeutic Target for Oxidative and Metabolic Stress-Related Conditions

    Ana Carolina Ariza;Peter Meinardus T. Deen;Joris Hubertus Robben

  • Cell biological aspects of the vasopressin type-2 receptor and aquaporin 2 water channel in nephrogenic diabetes insipidus

    Joris H. Robben;Nine V. A. M. Knoers;Peter M. T. Deen

  • New mutations in the AQP2 gene in nephrogenic diabetes insipidus resulting in functional but misrouted water channels.

    S.M. Mulders;N.V.A.M. Knoers;A.F. van Lieburg;L.A.H. Monnens

  • The Subcellular Localization of an Aquaporin-2 Tetramer Depends on the Stoichiometry of Phosphorylated and Nonphosphorylated Monomers

    E.J. Kamsteeg;I. Heijnen;C.H. van Os;P.M.T. Deen

  • Heteroligomerization of an Aquaporin-2 mutant with wild-type Aquaporin-2 and their misrouting to late endosomes/lysosomes explains dominant nephrogenic diabetes insipidus

    Nannette Marr;Daniel G Bichet;Michele Lonergan;Marie-Francoise Arthus

  • Glycosylation Is Important for Cell Surface Expression of the Water Channel Aquaporin-2 but Is Not Essential for Tetramerization in the Endoplasmic Reticulum

    Giel Hendriks;Marco Koudijs;Bas W.M. van Balkom;Viola Oorschot

  • Quaternary ammonium compounds as water channel blockers. Specificity, potency, and site of action.

    Frank J.M. Detmers;Bert L. de Groot;E. Matthias Müller;Andrew Hinton

  • Aquaporin-2 transfection of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells reconstitutes vasopressin-regulated transcellular osmotic water transport.

    P. M. T. Deen;J. P. L. Rijss;S. M. Mulders;R. J. Errington

Frequent Co-Authors

C.H. van Os
C.H. van Os Radboud University
Nine V.A.M. Knoers
Nine V.A.M. Knoers University Medical Center Groningen
Peter van der Sluijs
Peter van der Sluijs Utrecht University
Daniel G. Bichet
Daniel G. Bichet University of Montreal
Olivier Devuyst
Olivier Devuyst University of Zurich
Jack F.M. Wetzels
Jack F.M. Wetzels Radboud University
Mihai G. Netea
Mihai G. Netea Radboud University
Ron A. Wevers
Ron A. Wevers Radboud University
Anneke I. den Hollander
Anneke I. den Hollander Radboud University
Arjan Blokland
Arjan Blokland Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a wide range of online degrees and career opportunities in healthcare and life sciences. Modern online education offers flexible, accelerated pathways to launch or advance your career—whether you’re moving into clinical roles, research, or management.

For registered nurses looking to expand their credentials, rn to bsn online no clinicals programs can provide a streamlined educational upgrade with minimal in-person requirements. Those aiming for leadership roles in healthcare might consider a degree in healthcare management, which equips graduates with essential skills to oversee medical organizations.

Specialized areas are also accessible online. For example, psych nurse practitioner programs enable nurses to gain advanced psychiatric training and play key roles in mental health care. Those passionate about wellness and nutrition might pursue accelerated dietitian programs to quickly prepare for careers as dietitians or nutritionists.

With so many options, students in Biology and Biochemistry can tailor their education to align with evolving job markets and personal ambitions, all while benefiting from the flexibility of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Peter M. T. Deen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles