World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roland J. Siezen

Roland J. Siezen

Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
Netherlands
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
86
Citations
24477
World Ranking
3001
National Ranking
78

Roland J. Siezen publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland J. Siezen sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 232 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Roland J. Siezen D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland J. Siezen sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Roland J. Siezen is currently affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands, contributing to academic research from this institution. Their professional profile reflects involvement in the scientific community through various channels associated with this university.

No specific recent papers have been listed, and there are no recorded frequent co-authors or defined topics of collaboration with other researchers. Additionally, there is no data related to prominent publication venues linked to their work.

Details concerning main fields of study, subfields, and specific research topics have not been provided, which limits insight into the precise areas of their academic focus or specialization.

There is no information available regarding book publications or awards that have been received throughout their career. The profile indicates that Roland J. Siezen is active and not deceased.

Best Publications

  • Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1

    Michiel Kleerebezem;Jos Boekhorst;Richard van Kranenburg;Douwe Molenaar

  • Subtilases: the superfamily of subtilisin-like serine proteases.

    Roland J. Siezen;Jack A. M. Leunissen

  • Characterization of the nisin gene cluster nisABTCIPR of Lactococcus lactis. Requirement of expression of the nisA and nisI genes for development of immunity

    Oscar P. Kuipers;Marke M. Beerthuyzen;Roland J. Siezen;Willem M. De Vos

  • Identification and characterization of the lantibiotic nisin Z, a natural nisin variant

    John W. M. Mulders;Ingrid J. Boerrigter;Harry S. Rollema;Roland J. Siezen

  • Epochal Evolution of GGII.4 Norovirus Capsid Proteins from 1995 to 2006

    J. Joukje Siebenga;Harry Vennema;Bernadet Renckens;Erwin de Bruin

  • Homology modelling and protein engineering strategy of subtilases, the family of subtilisin-like serine proteinases

    Roland J. Siezen;William M. de Vos;Jack A.M. Leunissen;Bauke W. Dijkstra

  • The extracellular biology of the lactobacilli

    Michiel Kleerebezem;Pascal Hols;Elvis Bernard;Thomas Rolain

  • The ESAT-6 gene cluster of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other high G+C Gram-positive bacteria

    Nico C Gey van Pittius;Junaid Gamieldien;Winston Hide;Gordon D Brown

  • The proteolytic system of lactic acid bacteria revisited: a genomic comparison

    Mengjin Liu;Mengjin Liu;Jumamurat R Bayjanov;Bernadet Renckens;Arjen Nauta

  • Analysis of Growth of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 on a Complex Medium Using a Genome-scale Metabolic Model

    Bas Teusink;Anne Wiersma;Douwe Molenaar;Christof Francke

  • Cloning of usp45, a gene encoding a secreted protein from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis MG1363.

    M van Asseldonk;G Rutten;M Oteman;R J Siezen

  • Phenotypic and genomic diversity of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from various environmental niches.

    Roland J. Siezen;Vesela A. Tzeneva;Anna Castioni;Michiel Wels

  • Discovering lactic acid bacteria by genomics

    Todd Klaenhammer;Eric Altermann;Fabrizio Arigoni;Alexander Bolotin

  • Furin is a subtilisin-like proprotein processing enzyme in higher eukaryotes

    W. J. M. Van De Ven;J. Voorberg;R. Fontijn;H. Pannekoek

  • Exploring Lactobacillus plantarum Genome Diversity by Using Microarrays

    Douwe Molenaar;Françoise Bringel;Frank H. Schuren;Willem M. de Vos

  • Reconstructing the metabolic network of a bacterium from its genome

    Christof Francke;Roland J. Siezen;Bas Teusink

  • Genomic diversity and versatility of Lactobacillus plantarum, a natural metabolic engineer

    Roland J Siezen;Johan E T van Hylckama Vlieg

  • Flavour formation from amino acids by lactic acid bacteria: predictions from genome sequence analysis

    Richard van Kranenburg;Michiel Kleerebezem;Johan van Hylckama Vlieg;Björn M Ursing

  • Engineering dehydrated amino acid residues in the antimicrobial peptide nisin.

    O. P. Kuipers;H. S. Rollema;W. M. G. J. Yap;H. J. Boot

  • Improvement of Solubility and Stability of the Antimicrobial Peptide Nisin by Protein Engineering

    Harry S. Rollema;Oscar P. Kuipers;Paula Both;Willem M. de Vos

Frequent Co-Authors

Willem M. de Vos
Willem M. de Vos Wageningen University & Research
Jos Boekhorst
Jos Boekhorst Wageningen University & Research
Oscar P. Kuipers
Oscar P. Kuipers University of Groningen
Sacha A. F. T. van Hijum
Sacha A. F. T. van Hijum KPMG (Netherlands)
Michiel Kleerebezem
Michiel Kleerebezem Wageningen University & Research
Douwe Molenaar
Douwe Molenaar Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Tjakko Abee
Tjakko Abee Wageningen University & Research
Bas Teusink
Bas Teusink Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Kristin Kremer
Kristin Kremer KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation
Jan Kok
Jan Kok University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to a wide range of online degrees and flexible career pathways, especially in healthcare and medical information management. For those interested in the business and administrative side of healthcare, pursuing the cheapest online mba healthcare management programs may provide a cost-effective route into leadership roles that intersect with science.

Certifications like CCS and CPC are also valuable in the medical coding industry. Understanding the distinction between them is crucial—learn about ccs vs cpc certification to decide which fits your career goals.

Medical coding is a fast-growing field with solid earning potential. If you’re curious about pay scales, see detailed medical coder salary data to inform your decision.

Lastly, the healthcare sector’s digital transformation means that roles in billing and coding remain in high demand. If you want to know whether this path is right for you, get a balanced view by exploring is medical billing and coding in demand for the latest insights and industry trends.

Best Scientists Citing Roland J. Siezen

Trending Scientists