World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics and Molecular Biology
France
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 89 751 19 392 31447

Roland Berger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roland Berger between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roland Berger published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 1992. 1 of the 427 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 1992. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 8 publications 1980: 9 publications 1981: 9 publications 1982: 12 publications 1983: 10 publications 1984: 19 publications 1985: 29 publications 1986: 13 publications 1987: 13 publications 1988: 13 publications 1989: 18 publications 1990: 19 publications 1991: 26 publications 1992: 30 publications 1993: 29 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 16 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1970 2025

427 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roland Berger: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 8
1980 9
1981 9
1982 12
1983 10
1984 19
1985 29
1986 13
1987 13
1988 13
1989 18
1990 19
1991 26
1992 30
1993 29
1994 13
1995 16
1996 15
1997 14
1998 10
1999 11
2000 12
2001 7
2002 8
2003 6
2004 9
2005 6
2006 12
2007 11
2008 11
2009 2
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
2021 0
2022 1
2023 2
2024 0
2025 1
Total 427
Download as CSV

Roland Berger publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland Berger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 387–396 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 392 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24 392
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Roland Berger D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland Berger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50 89
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in France Leader Award

Overview

Roland Berger was affiliated with Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital in France during their research career. Their work spanned several fields, mainly mathematics and medicine.

The scientist published research covering core topics such as algebraic structures and combinatorial models, homotopy and cohomology in algebraic topology, advanced topics in algebra, and clinical and reproductive impacts related to COVID-19. Their focus included diverse subfields such as infectious diseases, geometry and topology, mathematical physics, algebra and number theory, and obstetrics and gynecology.

Roland Berger contributed to a range of research venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
  • EDULEARN proceedings

The scientist worked frequently with several collaborators, including Florian Götzinger, Begoña Santiago, Antoni Noguera-Julián, Miguel Lanaspa, and Laura Lancella.

Key publications by Roland Berger included:

  • "A cup-cap duality in Koszul calculus," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Calabi-Yau property in derived Koszul calculus," 2025, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "COVID-19 in children and adolescents in Europe: a multinational, multicentre cohort study," 2020, The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health (as a co-author)
  • "GAME - SET - MATCH: GROW! HOW PROFESSIONAL TENNIS FOSTERS PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS STUDENTS," 2022, EDULEARN proceedings (as a co-author)

Best Publications

  • A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera

    Chloé James;Valérie Ugo;Jean-Pierre Le Couédic;Judith Staerk

  • All-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia. I. Clinical results.

    Sylvie Castaigne;Christine Chomienne;Marie Therese Daniel;Paola Ballerini

  • NB4, a maturation inducible cell line with t(15;17) marker isolated from a human acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3)

    M Lanotte;V Martin-Thouvenin;S Najman;P Balerini

  • A TEL-JAK2 Fusion Protein with Constitutive Kinase Activity in Human Leukemia

    Virginie Lacronique;Virginie Lacronique;Anthony Boureux;Anthony Boureux;Véronique Della Valle;Véronique Della Valle;Hélène Poirel;Hélène Poirel

  • The t(12;21) of acute lymphoblastic leukemia results in a tel-AML1 gene fusion.

    SP Romana;M Mauchauffe;M Le Coniat;I Chumakov

  • Structure, localization and transcriptional properties of two classes of retinoic acid receptor alpha fusion proteins in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL): structural similarities with a new family of oncoproteins.

    P. Kastner;A. Perez;Y. Lutz;C. Rochette-Egly

  • High frequency of t(12;21) in childhood B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    SP Romana;H Poirel;M Leconiat;MA Flexor

  • Identification of BTG2, an antiproliferative p53–dependent component of the DNA damage cellular response pathway

    Jean-Pierre Rouault;Nicole Falette;Fabienne Guéhenneux;Céline Guillot

  • The JAK2V617F activating mutation occurs in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia, but not in acute lymphoblastic leukemia or chronic lymphocytic leukemia

    Ross L. Levine;Marc Loriaux;Brian J. P. Huntly;Mignon L. Loh

  • Bridging Ral GTPase to Rho pathways. RLIP76, a Ral effector with CDC42/Rac GTPase-activating protein activity.

    Viviana Jullien-Flores;Olivier Dorseuil;Francisco Romero;Frank Letourneur

  • Correlation between immunoglobulin light chain expression and variant translocation in Burkitt's lymphoma

    G M Lenoir;J L Preud'homme;A Bernheim;R Berger

  • A new recurrent and specific cryptic translocation, t(5;14)(q35;q32), is associated with expression of the Hox11L2 gene in T acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    O A Bernard;M Busson-LeConiat;P Ballerini;M Mauchauffé

  • Involvement of a human gene related to the Drosophila spen gene in the recurrent t(1;22) translocation of acute megakaryocytic leukemia

    Thomas Mercher;Maryvonne Busson-Le Coniat;Richard Monni;Martine Mauchauffé

  • Rearrangements of the retinoic acid receptor alpha and promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger genes resulting from t(11;17)(q23;q21) in a patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia.

    Sai Juan Chen;Arthur Zelent;Jian Hua Tong;Huai Qin Yu

  • t(12;21): a new recurrent translocation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    Serge P. Romana;Maryvonne Le Coniat;Roland Berger

  • Molecular basis of 11q23 rearrangements in hematopoietic malignant proliferations.

    Olivier A. Bernard;Roland Berger

  • The Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription STAT5b Gene Is a New Partner of Retinoic Acid Receptor α in Acute Promyelocytic-Like Leukaemia

    Cécile Arnould;Christophe Philippe;Violaine Bourdon;Marie José Grégoire

  • AF6q21, a novel partner of the MLL gene in t(6;11)(q21;q23), defines a forkhead transcriptional factor subfamily.

    Josette Hillion;Maryvonne Le Coniat;Philippe Jonveaux;Roland Berger

  • A new gene, BCM, on chromosome 16 is fused to the interleukin 2 gene by a t(4;16)(q26;p13) translocation in a malignant T cell lymphoma.

    Y. Laâbi;M.P. Gras;F. Carbonnel;J.C. Brouet

  • P53 Gene Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia With 17p Monosomy

    Pierre Fenaux;Philippe Jonveaux;Isabelle Quiquandon;Jean Luc Lai

Frequent Co-Authors

Olivier Bernard
Olivier Bernard University of Paris-Saclay
Alain Bernheim
Alain Bernheim Institut Gustave Roussy
Philippe Jonveaux
Philippe Jonveaux University of Lorraine
Thomas B. Shows
Thomas B. Shows Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Mark H. Skolnick
Mark H. Skolnick Myriad Genetics (Germany)
David R. Cox
David R. Cox Stanford University
Kenneth K. Kidd
Kenneth K. Kidd Yale University
Newton E. Morton
Newton E. Morton University of Southampton
Ray White
Ray White University of Utah
Peter L. Pearson
Peter L. Pearson Universidade de São Paulo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring molecular biology opens doors to various online degrees and career transitions in science and healthcare. Many prospective students are searching for alternate or complementary fields where their biology foundations are valuable.

If you’re looking for topics beyond molecular biology, consider the affordable library science degree online for positions in research, archival work, or scientific information management. Professionals with a molecular biology background may also be interested in health sciences. For instance, accredited speech pathology programs are a popular pathway for those wanting to work in communication sciences and disorders.

Notably, there are transition to SLP master’s for non-CSD majors available online, making it possible to enter new allied health careers without starting over. Even if your background is not in nursing, options like online absn programs for non nurses can provide a direct route into nursing from a molecular biology or science degree.

These diverse, flexible pathways make it easier to adapt your scientific education to evolving career interests and the changing job market.

Best Scientists Citing Roland Berger

Recently Published Articles