World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
157
Citations
79826
World Ranking
893
National Ranking
509

Robert M. Post publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Post sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 647 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert M. Post D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Post sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 157 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert M. Post is affiliated with George Washington University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields related to Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, Speech and Hearing, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Organic Chemistry.

The scholar's work is concentrated on various main topics including Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare, Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies, Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics, Schizophrenia Research and Treatment, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Robert M. Post include:

  • How to prevent the malignant progression of bipolar disorder, 2020, Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry
  • What Patients with Bipolar Disorder Need to Know about Lithium, 2024, Pharmaceuticals
  • What patients with bipolar disorder need to know about lithium, 2024, Preprints.org

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Robert M. Post encompass Janusz Rybakowski, Monica Macellaro, Rita Cafaro, Christopher Kelly, and Michael J. Ostacher.

Their publications appear across several venues, including:

  • Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
  • Preprints.org
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development

Best Publications

  • Transduction of psychosocial stress into the neurobiology of recurrent affective disorder.

    Robert M. Post

  • Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: the Mood Disorder Questionnaire.

    Robert M.A. Hirschfeld;Janet B.W. Williams;Robert L. Spitzer;Joseph R. Calabrese

  • Stress and glucocorticoids affect the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3 mRNAs in the hippocampus

    MA Smith;S Makino;R Kvetnansky;RM Post

  • Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) 2018 guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder

    Lakshmi N Yatham;Sidney H Kennedy;Sagar V Parikh;Ayal Schaffer

  • The clinical phenomenology of multiple personality disorder: review of 100 recent cases.

    Frank W. Putnam;Juliet J. Guroff;Edward K. Silberman;Lisa Barban

  • Re-evaluating the prevalence of and diagnostic composition within the broad clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders.

    Hagop S. Akiskal;Marc L. Bourgeois;Jules Angst;Robert Post

  • Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves mood in depression.

    Mark S. George;Eric M. Wassermann;Wendol A. Williams;Ann Callahan

  • Modification of the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale for use in bipolar illness (BP): the CGI-BP

    Melissa K. Spearing;Robert M. Post;Gabriele S. Leverich;Diane Brandt

  • Brain activity during transient sadness and happiness in healthy women.

    Mark S. George;Terence A. Ketter;Priti I. Parekh;Barry Horwitz

  • Axis I psychiatric comorbidity and its relationship to historical illness variables in 288 patients with bipolar disorder

    Susan L. McElroy;Lori L. Altshuler;Trisha Suppes;Paul E. Keck

  • Antidepressant-induced mania and cycle acceleration: a controversy revisited.

    Lori L. Altshuler;Robert M. Post;Gabriele S. Leverich;Kirstin Mikalauskas

  • Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder

    R. M A Hirschfeld;P. J. Clayton;I. Cohen;J. Fawcett

  • The International Society for bipolar Disorders (ISBD) task force report on antidepressant use in bipolar disorders

    Isabella Pacchiarotti;David J. Bond;Ross J. Baldessarini;Willem A. Nolen

  • Opposite effects of high and low frequency rTMS on regional brain activity in depressed patients

    Andrew M Speer;Timothy A Kimbrell;Eric M Wassermann;Jennifer D. Repella

  • Mood Improvement Following Daily Left Prefrontal Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Depression: A Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial

    Mark S. George;Eric M. Wassermann;Tim A. Kimbrell;John T. Little

  • Carbamazepine in manic-depressive illness: a new treatment.

    J C Ballenger;R M Post

  • Neurobiology of mood disorders

    Robert M. Post;James C. Ballenger

  • A placebo-controlled study of lamotrigine and gabapentin monotherapy in refractory mood disorders.

    Mark A. Frye;Terence A. Ketter;Timothy A. Kimbrell;Timothy A. Kimbrell;Robert T. Dunn

  • The Stanley Foundation Bipolar Treatment Outcome Network. II. Demographics and illness characteristics of the first 261 patients.

    Trisha Suppes;Trisha Suppes;Gabriele S Leverich;Gabriele S Leverich;Paul E Keck;Paul E Keck;Willem A Nolen

  • Increasing effects of repetitive cocaine administration in the rat

    Robert M. Post;Harvey Rose

Frequent Co-Authors

Lori L. Altshuler
Lori L. Altshuler University of California, Los Angeles
Trisha Suppes
Trisha Suppes Stanford University
Mark A. Frye
Mark A. Frye University of California, Los Angeles
Paul E. Keck
Paul E. Keck University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Susan L. McElroy
Susan L. McElroy University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Willem A. Nolen
Willem A. Nolen University Medical Center Groningen
Heinz Grunze
Heinz Grunze Paracelsus Medical University
Susan R. Weiss
Susan R. Weiss University of Pennsylvania
Terence A. Ketter
Terence A. Ketter Stanford University
Mark S. George
Mark S. George Medical University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many aspiring healthcare professionals seek flexible education options that allow them to advance their careers quickly and conveniently. Online nursing degrees are especially popular for those who need to balance work, family, and study. For example, the fastest msn to dnp program options allow nurses to reach a Doctor of Nursing Practice qualification at an accelerated pace.

If you are looking for a program that doesn’t require a lengthy research project, consider dnp programs without dissertation. This helps students complete their doctoral degree with a focus on clinical practice.

Those looking for an entry point to nursing may benefit from an lpn accelerated program, which shortens the path to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse.

Mental health is another growing specialization. The msn to pmhnp online pathway offers advanced education for psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners.

These diverse options make it easier to find a career path and degree program that fits your individual needs in the dynamic field of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Post

Trending Scientists