World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10351 5323 307 39336

Robert H. Knopp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert H. Knopp between 1969 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert H. Knopp published across 56 years, from 1969 to 2024, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2000. 1 of the 309 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2000. 1969: 2 publications 1970: 5 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 2 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 20 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1969 2024

309 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert H. Knopp: publications per year, 1969 to 2024
Year Publications
1969 2
1970 5
1971 1
1972 2
1973 1
1974 2
1975 2
1976 3
1977 2
1978 1
1979 0
1980 4
1981 5
1982 5
1983 5
1984 4
1985 7
1986 7
1987 2
1988 9
1989 4
1990 8
1991 7
1992 6
1993 8
1994 13
1995 12
1996 9
1997 12
1998 10
1999 13
2000 20
2001 12
2002 12
2003 12
2004 10
2005 10
2006 14
2007 5
2008 9
2009 12
2010 7
2011 5
2012 2
2013 1
2014 1
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
2020 2
2021 0
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
Total 309
Download as CSV

Robert H. Knopp publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert H. Knopp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 307 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834 307
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert H. Knopp D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert H. Knopp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert H. Knopp was affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their work focused on fields related to medicine, with particular emphasis on surgery, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, emergency medicine, and economics and econometrics.

Their research spanned several main topics, including:

  • Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • HIV-related health complications and treatments
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Knopp contributed to research published predominantly in venues such as The Lancet and The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. Two notable papers from recent years include:

  • Effect of statin therapy on muscle symptoms: an individual participant data meta-analysis of large-scale, randomised, double-blind trials (2022), published in The Lancet
  • Effects of statin therapy on diagnoses of new-onset diabetes and worsening glycaemia in large-scale randomised blinded statin trials: an individual participant data meta-analysis (2024), published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology

The scientist collaborated frequently with other researchers, including Christina Reith, Colin Baigent, Lisa Blackwell, Jonathan Emberson, and Enti Spata. Each of these coauthors contributed to multiple joint publications.

Throughout their career, Robert H. Knopp addressed complex interactions between lipid metabolism, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes, contributing to the understanding of how statin therapies affect muscle symptoms and diabetes risk. Their work incorporated meta-analyses of individual participant data from large randomized controlled trials.

Robert H. Knopp was deceased at the time of this profile. Their research continues to be part of ongoing discussions in medical literature, especially concerning the safety and metabolic effects of cholesterol-lowering treatments.

Best Publications

  • Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes During 6.8 Years of Hormone Therapy: Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study Follow-up (HERS II)

    Stephen Hulley;Curt Furberg;Elizabeth Barrett-Connor;Jane Cauley

  • Relationship of adiponectin to body fat distribution, insulin sensitivity and plasma lipoproteins: evidence for independent roles of age and sex.

    Miriam Cnop;P. J. Havel;K. M. Utzschneider;D. B. Carr

  • Intra-Abdominal Fat Is a Major Determinant of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Criteria for the Metabolic Syndrome

    Darcy B. Carr;Kristina M. Utzschneider;Rebecca L. Hull;Keiichi Kodama

  • Dietary Intake and Cell Membrane Levels of Long-Chain n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and the Risk of Primary Cardiac Arrest

    David S. Siscovick;T. E. Raghunathan;Irena King;Sheila Weinmann

  • Drug treatment of lipid disorders

    Robert H. Knopp

  • Shotgun proteomics implicates protease inhibition and complement activation in the antiinflammatory properties of HDL

    Tomas Vaisar;Subramaniam Pennathur;Pattie S. Green;Sina A. Gharib

  • The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    J. J. Brugts;T. Yetgin;S. E. Hoeks;Antonio Gotto

  • Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in older people: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28 randomised controlled trials

    Jane Armitage;Colin Baigent;Elizabeth Barnes;D John Betteridge

  • Efficacy and Safety of Atorvastatin in the Prevention of Cardiovascular End Points in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes: The Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (ASPEN)

    Robert H Knopp;Michael d'Emden;Johan G Smilde;Stuart J Pocock

  • Defective removal of cellular cholesterol and phospholipids by apolipoprotein A-I in Tangier Disease.

    Gordon A. Francis;Robert H. Knopp;John F. Oram

  • The Concurrent Accumulation of Intra-Abdominal and Subcutaneous Fat Explains the Association Between Insulin Resistance and Plasma Leptin Concentrations: Distinct Metabolic Effects of Two Fat Compartments

    Miriam Cnop;Melinda J. Landchild;Josep Vidal;Peter J. Havel

  • Dietary Guidelines for Healthy American Adults A Statement for Health Professionals From the Nutrition Committee, American Heart Association

    R. M. Krauss;R. J. Deckelbaum;N. Ernst;E. Fisher

  • Managing Preexisting Diabetes for Pregnancy: Summary of evidence and consensus recommendations for care

    John L. Kitzmiller;Jennifer M. Block;Florence M. Brown;Patrick M. Catalano

  • Effect of ritonavir on lipids and post-heparin lipase activities in normal subjects

    Jonathan Q. Purnell;Alberto Zambon;Robert H. Knopp;David J. Pizzuti

  • Effects of ezetimibe, a new cholesterol absorption inhibitor, on plasma lipids in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

    R.H. Knopp;H. Gitter;T. Truitt;H. Bays

  • Carbohydrate metabolism in pregnancy: VI. Plasma fuels, insulin, liver composition, gluconeogenesis, and nitrogen metabolism during late gestation in the fed and fasted rat

    Emilo Herrera;Robert H. Knopp;Norbert Freinkel

  • Incidence of Spontaneous Abortion among Normal Women and Insulin-Dependent Diabetic Women Whose Pregnancies Were Identified within 21 Days of Conception

    Mills Jl;Simpson Jl;Driscoll Sg;Jovanovic-Peterson L

  • Effect of Estrogen/Progestin Potency on Lipid/Lipoprotein Cholesterol

    Patricia Wahl;Carolyn Walden;Robert Knopp;Joanne Hoover

  • Noncardiovascular disease outcomes during 6.8 years of hormone therapy. heart and estrogen/progestin replacement study follow-up (HERS II)

    S. Hulley;C. Furberg;E. Barrett-Connor

  • Estrogen and progestin, lipoprotein(a), and the risk of recurrent coronary heart disease events after menopause.

    Michael G. Shlipak;Joel A. Simon;Eric Vittinghoff;Feng Lin

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven E. Kahn
Steven E. Kahn University of Washington
John J. Albers
John J. Albers University of Washington
Evan A. Stein
Evan A. Stein Medpace (United States)
Michael H. Davidson
Michael H. Davidson University of Chicago
Santica M. Marcovina
Santica M. Marcovina University of Washington
John D. Brunzell
John D. Brunzell University of Washington
James L. Mills
James L. Mills National Institutes of Health
Harold E. Bays
Harold E. Bays Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center
George A. Bray
George A. Bray Louisiana State University
Alan Chait
Alan Chait University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring options related to studying Medicine in the USA, there are several flexible online pathways worth considering. For non-nurses with a bachelor’s degree interested in making a career shift, the online direct entry msn program offers a fast-track route to becoming a registered nurse and earning a master’s degree, all completed through tailored online coursework.

Those seeking entry into the nursing profession can also benefit from the easiest bsn program to get into, designed for applicants looking for accessible and student-friendly admission requirements. Moreover, if you wish to bypass certain standardized tests, it’s possible to apply to a nursing school that does not require teas test, making the process more straightforward.

For those interested in administrative roles in healthcare, top medical billing and coding schools online offer accredited programs with flexible schedules and accessible financial aid options. Whether you’re entering a clinical or non-clinical field, these online degrees pave the way for rewarding healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Robert H. Knopp

Recently Published Articles