World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard D. Vaughan-Jones

Richard D. Vaughan-Jones

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
11674
World Ranking
10958
National Ranking
848

Richard D. Vaughan-Jones publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D. Vaughan-Jones sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 189 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Richard D. Vaughan-Jones D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D. Vaughan-Jones sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard D. Vaughan-Jones is a researcher affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their academic work is situated within the environment of one of the world's leading research institutions, which provides a strong foundation for scientific investigation and collaboration.

The available data does not list specific recent papers or publications by Vaughan-Jones, nor does it provide details on frequent co-authors or preferred publication venues. Despite this, their academic presence at a prestigious university suggests involvement in ongoing research activities.

Detailed information about Vaughan-Jones's main fields of study, subfields, and key research topics is not provided. There also are no recorded awards or book publications associated with this researcher in the current data set.

The absence of explicit publication records or topics may indicate a focus on emerging or specialized research areas that are not widely cataloged in the available sources, or a potential role oriented towards teaching or internal research functions at the university.

This profile reflects the information currently accessible regarding Richard D. Vaughan-Jones and does not extend beyond the data provided.

Best Publications

  • Regulation of tumor pH and the role of carbonic anhydrase 9.

    Pawel Swietach;Richard D. Vaughan-Jones;Adrian L. Harris

  • The chemistry, physiology and pathology of pH in cancer

    Pawel Swietach;Richard D. Vaughan-Jones;Adrian L. Harris;Alzbeta Hulikova

  • Effects of hypoxia on membrane potential and intracellular calcium in rat neonatal carotid body type I cells.

    K J Buckler;R D Vaughan-Jones

  • Role of bicarbonate in pH recovery from intracellular acidosis in the guinea‐pig ventricular myocyte.

    D Lagadic-Gossmann;K J Buckler;R D Vaughan-Jones

  • Characterization of intracellular pH regulation in the guinea-pig ventricular myocyte

    Chae Hun Leem;Dominique Lagadic‐Gossmann;Richard D. Vaughan‐Jones

  • The role of carbonic anhydrase 9 in regulating extracellular and intracellular ph in three-dimensional tumor cell growths.

    Pawel Swietach;Shalini Patiar;Claudiu T. Supuran;Adrian L. Harris

  • Carbonic Anhydrase IX Promotes Tumor Growth and Necrosis In Vivo and Inhibition Enhances Anti-VEGF Therapy

    Alan McIntyre;Shalini Patiar;Simon Wigfield;Ji-Liang Li

  • New insights into the physiological role of carbonic anhydrase IX in tumour pH regulation

    P Swietach;A Hulikova;R D Vaughan-Jones;A L Harris

  • Application of a new pH-sensitive fluoroprobe (carboxy-SNARF-1) for intracellular pH measurement in small, isolated cells.

    K. J. Buckler;R. D. Vaughan-Jones

  • Ca2+ ions can affect intracellular pH in mammalian cardiac muscle

    Richard D Vaughan-Jones;W J Lederer;D A Eisner

  • Effects of mitochondrial uncouplers on intracellular calcium, pH and membrane potential in rat carotid body type I cells

    K J Buckler;R D Vaughan-Jones

  • Tumor-associated carbonic anhydrase 9 spatially coordinates intracellular pH in three-dimensional multicellular growths.

    Pawel Swietach;Simon Wigfield;Philip Cobden;Claudiu T. Supuran

  • Effects of hypercapnia on membrane potential and intracellular calcium in rat carotid body type I cells.

    K J Buckler;R D Vaughan-Jones

  • Na(+)-HCO3- symport in the sheep cardiac Purkinje fibre.

    C Dart;Richard D Vaughan-Jones

  • Mechanism of potassium efflux and action potential shortening during ischaemia in isolated mammalian cardiac muscle.

    R. N. A. Gasser;R. D. Vaughan-Jones

  • Effect of intracellular and extracellular pH on contraction in isolated, mammalian cardiac muscle.

    C Bountra;R D Vaughan-Jones

  • Effects of extracellular pH, PCO2 and HCO3- on intracellular pH in isolated type-I cells of the neonatal rat carotid body.

    K J Buckler;R D Vaughan-Jones;C Peers;D Lagadic-Gossmann

  • The dependence of sodium pumping and tension on intracellular sodium activity in voltage-clamped sheep Purkinje fibres.

    D A Eisner;W J Lederer;R D Vaughan-Jones

  • Functional characterization of human NBC4 as an electrogenic Na+-HCO cotransporter (NBCe2).

    Leila V. Virkki;Darren A. Wilson;Richard D. Vaughan-Jones;Walter F. Boron

  • Intracellular pH and its regulation in isolated type I carotid body cells of the neonatal rat.

    K J Buckler;R D Vaughan-Jones;C Peers;P C Nye

Frequent Co-Authors

adrian l harris
adrian l harris University of Oxford
Kai Kaila
Kai Kaila University of Helsinki
Claudiu T. Supuran
Claudiu T. Supuran University of Florence
Seth L. Alper
Seth L. Alper Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Walter F. Boron
Walter F. Boron Case Western Reserve University
Kieran Clarke
Kieran Clarke University of Oxford
James P. Keener
James P. Keener University of Utah
Chris Peers
Chris Peers University of Leeds
Denis Noble
Denis Noble University of Oxford
Virgilio L. Lew
Virgilio L. Lew University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens diverse career options, many of which can be accessed through online education. If you’re interested in applying biological science to nutrition, you might consider one of the best dietitian programs to become a registered dietitian or nutritionist.

Clinical pathways are also popular. For those seeking a quick entry to the healthcare field, enrolling in medical assistant programs can provide you with practical job skills and financial aid options. If you are already a certified medical assistant, you may want to advance your career by considering a cma to lpn bridge program online and move into licensed practical nursing.

For those set on earning a degree in life sciences, flexible and accelerated options are available. Check out a biology degree online to fast-track your studies or balance education with work.

Best Scientists Citing Richard D. Vaughan-Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles