World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 53 13132 11816 741 657 149 9457

Paula J. Booth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paula J. Booth between 1989 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paula J. Booth published across 38 years, from 1989 to 2026, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2006. 2 of the 153 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2006. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
1989 2026

153 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paula J. Booth: publications per year, 1989 to 2026
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 5
1991 3
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 3
1997 5
1998 4
1999 2
2000 7
2001 8
2002 1
2003 1
2004 6
2005 4
2006 10
2007 5
2008 3
2009 5
2010 5
2011 7
2012 6
2013 5
2014 4
2015 4
2016 3
2017 10
2018 5
2019 4
2020 9
2021 5
2022 6
2023 0
2024 1
2025 1
2026 1
Total 153
Download as CSV

Paula J. Booth publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paula J. Booth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 149 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218 149
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Paula J. Booth D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paula J. Booth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872 53
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paula J. Booth is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the broad field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a focus on several key subfields and topics related to molecular and cellular processes.

The main subfields in which Paula Booth publishes include Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Spectroscopy, Oncology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Their work addresses a range of scientific topics, most notably:

  • Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • RNA and Protein Synthesis Mechanisms
  • Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Cellular Transport and Secretion
  • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, their closest co-authors include Heather E. Findlay and Nicola J. Harris, each with 10 joint publications, followed by Grant A. Pellowe and Eamonn Reading with six collaborations each, and Andy M. Lau with four.

Paula Booth's work has appeared repeatedly in several scientific venues. Notable frequent publication venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Communications, Biophysical Journal, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, and Methods in Molecular Biology.

Recent research papers authored by or co-authored with Paula J. Booth highlight diverse areas of study within molecular biophysics and membrane biology. Selected examples include:

  • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry captures distinct dynamics upon substrate and inhibitor binding to a transporter, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Delineating the Rules for Structural Adaptation of Membrane-Associated Proteins to Evolutionary Changes in Membrane Lipidome, 2020, Current Biology
  • Perturbed structural dynamics underlie inhibition and altered efflux of the multidrug resistance pump AcrB, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Activating mechanosensitive channels embedded in droplet interface bilayers using membrane asymmetry, 2021, Chemical Science
  • Cell-free expression tools to study co-translational folding of alpha helical membrane transporters, 2020, Scientific Reports

These publications reflect a focus on protein dynamics, membrane-associated adaptations, drug transport mechanisms, and mechanosensitive channel activation, demonstrating a breadth of experimental approaches including mass spectrometry and cell-free expression systems.

Best Publications

  • Membrane proteins, lipids and detergents: not just a soap opera

    Annela M Seddon;Paul Curnow;Paula J Booth

  • Self-Assembling Cages from Coiled-Coil Peptide Modules

    Jordan M. Fletcher;Robert L. Harniman;Frederick R. H. Barnes;Aimee L. Boyle

  • Micelles Protect Membrane Complexes from Solution to Vacuum

    Nelson P. Barrera;Natalie Di Bartolo;Paula J. Booth;Carol V. Robinson

  • A Basis Set of de Novo Coiled-Coil Peptide Oligomers for Rational Protein Design and Synthetic Biology

    Jordan M. Fletcher;Aimee L. Boyle;Marc Bruning;Gail J. Bartlett

  • A de novo peptide hexamer with a mutable channel

    Nathan R Zaccai;Bertie Chi;Andrew R Thomson;Aimee L Boyle

  • Comparison of the Dl/D2/cytochrome b559 reaction centre complex of photosystem two isolated by two different methods

    K. Gounaris;D.J. Chapman;P. Booth;B. Crystall

  • Modulation of folding and assembly of the membrane protein bacteriorhodopsin by intermolecular forces within the lipid bilayer.

    AR Curran;RH Templer;PJ Booth

  • Combined kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of alpha-helical membrane protein unfolding.

    Paul Curnow;Paula J. Booth

  • In vitro studies of membrane protein folding.

    Paula Booth;R H Templer;W Meijberg;Sarah Allen

  • Direct Protein-Lipid Interactions Shape the Conformational Landscape of Secondary Transporters

    Chloe Martens;Mrinal Shekhar;Antoni Borysik;Andy Lau

  • Evidence That Bilayer Bending Rigidity Affects Membrane Protein Folding

    P J Booth;M L Riley;S L Flitsch;Richard H Templer

  • Membrane protein folding.

    P J Booth;A R Curran

  • Intermediates in the folding of the membrane protein bacteriorhodopsin

    P J Booth;S L Flitsch;L J Stern;L J Stern;D A Greenhalgh

  • Slow alpha helix formation during folding of a membrane protein.

    M L Riley;B A Wallace;S L Flitsch;P J Booth

  • Measurements of the effect of membrane asymmetry on the mechanical properties of lipid bilayers

    Yuval Elani;Sowmya Purushothaman;Paula J. Booth;John M. Seddon

  • Estimations of lipid bilayer geometry in fluid lamellar phases.

    S.C Costigan;P.J Booth;R.H Templer

  • Folding scene investigation: membrane proteins.

    Paula J Booth;Paul Curnow

  • Building a synthetic mechanosensitive signaling pathway in compartmentalized artificial cells.

    James W Hindley;Daniela G Zheleva;Yuval Elani;Kalypso Charalambous

  • Assembly of light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b complex in vitro. Time-resolved fluorescence measurements.

    Paula J. Booth;Harald Paulsen

  • Thermodynamic properties of D1/D2/cytochrome b-559 reaction centres investigated by time-resolved fluorescence measurements

    P.J. Booth;B. Crystall;L.B. Giorgi;J. Barber

  • Biochemical Society Symposium

    Paul Curnow;Harry Mellor;David Stephens;M Lorch

  • Complete Reversible Refolding of a G-Protein Coupled Receptor on a Solid Support

    Natalie D Di Bartolo;Emma Louise Ruth Compton;Tony Warne;Patricia C. Edwards

Frequent Co-Authors

David R. Klug
David R. Klug Imperial College London
James Barber
James Barber Imperial College London
Robert V. Law
Robert V. Law Imperial College London
Sabine L. Flitsch
Sabine L. Flitsch University of Manchester
James R. Durrant
James R. Durrant Imperial College London
Emad Tajkhorshid
Emad Tajkhorshid University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
David J. Stephens
David J. Stephens University of Bristol
Richard B. Sessions
Richard B. Sessions University of Bristol
Derek N. Woolfson
Derek N. Woolfson University of Bristol
John M. Seddon
John M. Seddon Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in chemistry, related fields such as forensic science offer exciting career opportunities. Pursuing one of the best online colleges for forensic science can provide specialized knowledge that combines chemical principles with criminal investigations.

Those aiming for advanced roles may consider an online master's in forensic psychology, which explores the intersection of science and human behavior, enhancing career prospects in justice and legal systems.

For hands-on technical positions, the path of autopsy technician jobs offers a unique application of chemistry and anatomy. These roles demand precise scientific skills and a strong understanding of chemical analyses.

Overall, exploring diverse careers in forensic science can help chemistry students find rewarding paths that leverage their scientific expertise in forensic laboratories, law enforcement, or medical examiner offices.

Best Scientists Citing Paula J. Booth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles