What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
David J. Stephens mostly deals with Cell biology, Endoplasmic reticulum, COPII, COPI and Golgi apparatus.
When carried out as part of a general Cell biology research project, his work on Endosome, Dynein and Transport protein is frequently linked to work in Vesicular Transport Proteins, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.
David J. Stephens has included themes like Vesicle and Mutant in his Endoplasmic reticulum study.
His COPI study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Membrane, Membrane associated and GTPase.
He works on Golgi apparatus which deals in particular with Secretory pathway.
His research integrates issues of RAB1 and Rab in his study of Secretory pathway.
His most cited work include:
- Light Microscopy Techniques for Live Cell Imaging (875 citations)
- The role of cholesterol in the biosynthesis of beta-amyloid. (319 citations)
- The Retromer Coat Complex Coordinates Endosomal Sorting and Dynein-Mediated Transport, with Carrier Recognition by the trans-Golgi Network (212 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Cell biology, Golgi apparatus, Endoplasmic reticulum, COPII and Microtubule.
His study looks at the intersection of Cell biology and topics like Vesicle with SEC31.
In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Golgi apparatus, Glycosylation and Mutant is strongly linked to Zebrafish.
His studies in Endoplasmic reticulum integrate themes in fields like Transport protein and Secretion.
The various areas that David J. Stephens examines in his COPII study include COP-Coated Vesicles, STIM1, Procollagen peptidase, Vesicular-tubular cluster and COPI.
His studies deal with areas such as Mitosis and Motility as well as Microtubule.
He most often published in these fields:
- Cell biology (53.26%)
- Golgi apparatus (26.09%)
- Endoplasmic reticulum (22.28%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?
- Cell biology (53.26%)
- Golgi apparatus (26.09%)
- Cilium (7.61%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Cell biology, Golgi apparatus, Cilium, Zebrafish and Extracellular matrix.
His Cell biology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Secretion and Protein subunit.
His Ciliogenesis study in the realm of Cilium connects with subjects such as Axoneme.
His Zebrafish research includes themes of Loss function and Glycosylation.
David J. Stephens works mostly in the field of Extracellular matrix, limiting it down to topics relating to Procollagen peptidase and, in certain cases, Mutant, Type I collagen and Intracellular.
The concepts of his COPII study are interwoven with issues in Cellular differentiation, Vesicle, Anatomy, Morphogenesis and Matrix.
Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- ER-to-Golgi trafficking of procollagen in the absence of large carriers (41 citations)
- TFG Promotes Organization of Transitional ER and Efficient Collagen Secretion (39 citations)
- Assembly, Secretory Pathway Trafficking, and Surface Delivery of Kainate Receptors Is Regulated by Neuronal Activity (30 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Cell biology, Golgi apparatus, COPII, Endoplasmic reticulum and Secretion are his primary areas of study.
His Cell biology research includes themes of Procollagen peptidase and Loss function.
His work carried out in the field of Procollagen peptidase brings together such families of science as Transport protein, Morphogenesis, Cellular differentiation and Anatomy.
His study in COPII is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Autophagy, Vesicle, Developmental biology and Intracellular.
His work in Secretory pathway addresses issues such as Endocytosis, which are connected to fields such as Protein subunit.
David J. Stephens has researched Matrix in several fields, including Extracellular matrix, Vesicular transport protein and Organelle.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
