World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Reiner Giesler

Reiner Giesler

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 56 3681 3515 69 68 134 10330

Reiner Giesler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Reiner Giesler between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Reiner Giesler published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2009. 9 of the 146 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2009. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 6 publications
1993 2025

146 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Reiner Giesler: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 0
1995 0
1996 2
1997 1
1998 2
1999 0
2000 7
2001 0
2002 3
2003 2
2004 2
2005 5
2006 2
2007 3
2008 6
2009 12
2010 7
2011 8
2012 9
2013 12
2014 7
2015 7
2016 4
2017 6
2018 9
2019 2
2020 7
2021 4
2022 2
2023 4
2024 3
2025 6
Total 146
Download as CSV

Reiner Giesler publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reiner Giesler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 134 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544 134
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Reiner Giesler D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reiner Giesler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202 56
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Reiner Giesler is affiliated with Umeå University in Sweden and focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences. Their research extensively covers several subfields including atmospheric science, environmental chemistry, ecology, global and planetary change, and soil science.

The scientist's work revolves around key topics related to climate change and permafrost, peatlands and wetlands ecology, soil and water nutrient dynamics, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, methane hydrates and related phenomena, and fish ecology and management studies.

Reiner Giesler's recent publications include:

  • Thaw Transitions and Redox Conditions Drive Methane Oxidation in a Permafrost Peatland, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • Metabolism overrides photo-oxidation in CO2 dynamics of Arctic permafrost streams, 2020, Limnology and Oceanography
  • Dissolved organic matter biodegradation along a hydrological continuum in permafrost peatlands, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Nutrients influence seasonal metabolic patterns and total productivity of Arctic streams, 2020, Limnology and Oceanography
  • The missing pieces for better future predictions in subarctic ecosystems: A Torneträsk case study, 2020, AMBIO

Frequent co-authors in their collaborations include:

  • Carl-Magnus Mörth
  • Ryan A. Sponseller
  • Maria Myrstener
  • R. K. Varner
  • Jan Karlsson

Key venues publishing Reiner Giesler's work are:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • Limnology and Oceanography
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • AMBIO

Best Publications

  • Boreal forest plants take up organic nitrogen

    Torgny Näsholm;Alf Ekblad;Annika Nordin;Reiner Giesler

  • Rock-eating fungi

    A. G. Jongmans;N. van Breemen;U. Lundström;P. A. W. van Hees

  • Global change-driven effects on dissolved organic matter composition : Implications for food webs of northern lakes

    Irena F. Creed;Ann Kristin Bergström;Charles G. Trick;Nancy B. Grimm

  • Fertilization of boreal forest reduces both autotrophic and heterotrophic soil respiration

    Per Olsson;Sune Linder;Reiner Giesler;Peter Högberg

  • Low molecular weight organic acids and their Al-complexes in soil solution—composition, distribution and seasonal variation in three podzolized soils

    P. A. W. van Hees;Ulla Lundström;R. Giesler

  • Mycorrhizal weathering: A true case of mineral plant nutrition?

    Nico van Breemen;Roger Finlay;Ulla Lundström;Antoine G. Jongmans

  • CO2 supersaturation along the aquatic conduit in Swedish watersheds as constrained by terrestrial respiration, aquatic respiration and weathering.

    Christoph Humborg;Carl-Magnus Mörth;Marcus Sundbom;Hans Borg

  • Organic phosphorus in the terrestrial environment: a perspective on the state of the art and future priorities

    T. S. George;C. D. Giles;D. Menezes-Blackburn;Leo M. Condron

  • SOIL CHEMISTRY AND PLANTS IN FENNOSCANDIAN BOREAL FOREST AS EXEMPLIFIED BY A LOCAL GRADIENT

    Reiner Giesler;Mona Högberg;Peter Högberg

  • Advances in understanding the podzolization process resulting from a multidisciplinary study of three coniferous forest soils in the Nordic Countries

    U.S. Lundström;N. van Breemen;D.C. Bain;P.A.W. van Hees

  • Phosphate sorption in aluminum- and iron-rich humus soils

    Reiner Giesler;Tove Andersson;Lars Lövgren;Per Persson

  • Lake secondary production fueled by rapid transfer of low molecular weight organic carbon from terrestrial sources to aquatic consumers

    Martin Berggren;Lena Ström;Hjalmar Laudon;Jan Karlsson

  • Soil Solution Chemistry: Effects of Bulking Soil Samples

    R. Giesler;U. Lundström

  • Growth and biomass of mycorrhizal mycelia in coniferous forests along short natural nutrient gradients

    Lars Ola Nilsson;Reiner Giesler;Reiner Giesler;Erland Bååth;Håkan Wallander

  • High emission of carbon dioxide and methane during ice thaw in high latitude lakes

    Jan Karlsson;Reiner Giesler;Jenny Persson;Erik Lundin

  • Multiple sources and sinks of dissolved inorganic carbon across Swedish streams, refocusing the lens of stable C isotopes

    Audrey Campeau;Marcus B. Wallin;Reiner Giesler;Stefan Löfgren

  • Phosphorus Limitation in Boreal Forests: Effects of Aluminum and Iron Accumulation in the Humus Layer

    Reiner Giesler;Tomas Petersson;Peter Högberg

  • Comparison of soil solution chemistry assessment using zero‐tension lysimeters or centrifugation

    R. Giesler;U. S. Lundström;H. Grip

  • Estimation of permafrost thawing rates in a sub-arctic catchment using recession flow analysis

    S. W. Lyon;G. Destouni;R. Giesler;C. Humborg

  • Landscape process domains drive patterns of CO2 evasion from river networks

    Gerard Rocher-Ros;Ryan A. Sponseller;William Lidberg;Carl-Magnus Mörth

  • Integrating carbon emissions from lakes and streams in a subarctic catchment

    Erik J. Lundin;Reiner Giesler;Andreas Persson;Megan S. Thompson

  • Bioavailability of terrestrial organic carbon to lake bacteria: The case of a degrading subarctic permafrost mire complex

    Charlotte L. Roehm;Charlotte L. Roehm;Reiner Giesler;Jan Karlsson

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Karlsson
Jan Karlsson Umeå University
Per Persson
Per Persson Linköping University
Carl-Magnus Mörth
Carl-Magnus Mörth Stockholm University
David A. Wardle
David A. Wardle Umeå University
Christoph Humborg
Christoph Humborg Stockholm University
Ulrik Ilstedt
Ulrik Ilstedt Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Steve W. Lyon
Steve W. Lyon The Ohio State University
Ryan A. Sponseller
Ryan A. Sponseller Umeå University
Hjalmar Laudon
Hjalmar Laudon Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Mats Jansson
Mats Jansson Umeå University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can offer flexible and affordable options tailored to diverse career goals. For those interested in integrating social work with environmental justice initiatives, accredited dsw programs online provide advanced skills in both community advocacy and sustainable development.

Students seeking a broader foundation may consider an online general studies bachelor degree cheap, enabling them to combine knowledge across disciplines like environmental policy, biology, and communication while managing costs effectively.

For those looking for quicker academic paths, some of the easiest bachelor degree programs online can help build relevant skills that translate into entry-level roles focused on environmental analysis and fieldwork.

Specializing further, an online geology online degree offers rigorous training in Earth sciences, which is critical for careers in natural resource management, environmental consulting, and hazard mitigation.

Best Scientists Citing Reiner Giesler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles