World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
8669
World Ranking
8457
National Ranking
623

Randy M. Bruno publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randy M. Bruno sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 65 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Randy M. Bruno D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randy M. Bruno sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Randy M. Bruno is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Neuroscience, with a notable emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The scientific topics covered in their work include:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Their publication record reflects frequent contributions to the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife
  • Nature
  • Neuron
  • Nature Neuroscience

Recent papers illustrating their research interests include:

  • A human-specific modifier of cortical connectivity and circuit function (2021, Nature)
  • Sensorimotor strategies and neuronal representations for shape discrimination (2021, Neuron)
  • The geometry of cortical representations of touch in rodents (2023, Nature Neuroscience)
  • A rapid whisker-based decision underlying skilled locomotion in mice (2021, eLife)
  • Learning enhances encoding of time and temporal surprise in mouse primary sensory cortex (2022, Nature Communications)

Randy M. Bruno collaborates frequently with a set of coauthors including:

  • Chris C. Rodgers
  • Jung M. Park
  • Elizabeth M. C. Hillman
  • Ramon Nogueira
  • Y. Kate Hong

Best Publications

  • Simultaneous Denoising, Deconvolution, and Demixing of Calcium Imaging Data

    Eftychios A. Pnevmatikakis;Daniel Soudry;Yuanjun Gao;Timothy A. Machado

  • Cortex is driven by weak but synchronously active thalamocortical synapses.

    Randy M. Bruno;Bert Sakmann

  • Deep cortical layers are activated directly by thalamus.

    Christine M. Constantinople;Randy M. Bruno

  • Effects and mechanisms of wakefulness on local cortical networks.

    Christine M. Constantinople;Randy M. Bruno

  • Feedforward Mechanisms of Excitatory and Inhibitory Cortical Receptive Fields

    Randy M. Bruno;Daniel J. Simons

  • Layer- and cell-type-specific suprathreshold stimulus representation in rat primary somatosensory cortex.

    C. P. J. De Kock;R. M. Bruno;H. Spors;B. Sakmann

  • Cell Type–Specific Three-Dimensional Structure of Thalamocortical Circuits in a Column of Rat Vibrissal Cortex

    Marcel Oberlaender;Christiaan P. J. de Kock;Randy M. Bruno;Alejandro Ramirez

  • Dimensions of a projection column and architecture of VPM and POm axons in rat vibrissal cortex.

    Verena C. Wimmer;Randy M. Bruno;Christiaan P.J. de Kock;Thomas Kuner

  • Spatial Organization of Neuronal Population Responses in Layer 2/3 of Rat Barrel Cortex

    Jason N. D. Kerr;Christiaan P. J. de Kock;David S. Greenberg;Randy M. Bruno

  • Cell Type–Specific Thalamic Innervation in a Column of Rat Vibrissal Cortex

    Hanno-Sebastian Meyer;Verena C. Wimmer;Mike Hemberger;Randy M. Bruno

  • Sensory Experience Restructures Thalamocortical Axons during Adulthood

    Unknown

  • Thalamocortical Angular Tuning Domains within Individual Barrels of Rat Somatosensory Cortex

    Randy M. Bruno;Vivek Khatri;Peter W. Land;Daniel J. Simons

  • Sensation, movement and learning in the absence of barrel cortex

    Y. Kate Hong;Clay O. Lacefield;Chris C. Rodgers;Randy M. Bruno

  • Synchrony in sensation.

    Randy M Bruno

  • Dopamine and the mechanisms of cognition : Part II. D-amphetamine effects in human subjects performing a selective attention task

    David Servan-Schreiber;Cameron S. Carter;Randy M. Bruno;Jonathan D. Cohen

  • In vivo two-photon voltage-sensitive dye imaging reveals top-down control of cortical layers 1 and 2 during wakefulness

    Bernd Kuhn;Winfried Denk;Randy M. Bruno

  • High-order thalamic inputs to primary somatosensory cortex are stronger and longer lasting than cortical inputs.

    Wanying Zhang;Randy M Bruno

  • Subcolumnar Dendritic and Axonal Organization of Spiny Stellate and Star Pyramid Neurons within a Barrel in Rat Somatosensory Cortex

    Veronica Egger;Thomas Nevian;Randy M. Bruno

  • Dopamine and the mechanisms of cognition: Part I. A neural network model predicting dopamine effects on selective attention.

    David Servan-Schreiber;Randy M. Bruno;Cameron S. Carter;Jonathan D. Cohen;Jonathan D. Cohen

  • Prefrontal Cortex HCN1 Channels Enable Intrinsic Persistent Neural Firing and Executive Memory Function

    Sébastien J. Thuault;Gaël Malleret;Christine M. Constantinople;Russell Nicholls

  • Modeling a layer 4-to-layer 2/3 module of a single column in rat neocortex: Interweaving in vitro and in vivo experimental observations

    Leora Sarid;Randy M. Bruno;Bert Sakmann;Idan Segev

  • Reconstruction of an average cortical column in silico

    Moritz Helmstaedter;C. P. de Kock;D. Feldmeyer;R. M. Bruno

Frequent Co-Authors

Bert Sakmann
Bert Sakmann Max Planck Society
Daniel J. Simons
Daniel J. Simons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Stefano Fusi
Stefano Fusi Columbia University
Christiaan P. J. de Kock
Christiaan P. J. de Kock Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Liam Paninski
Liam Paninski Columbia University
Moritz Helmstaedter
Moritz Helmstaedter Max Planck Society
Jonathan D. Cohen
Jonathan D. Cohen Princeton University
Cameron S. Carter
Cameron S. Carter University of California, Irvine
Richard S. Mann
Richard S. Mann Columbia University
Asaf Keller
Asaf Keller University of Maryland, Baltimore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA opens doors to numerous interdisciplinary fields and career options, especially in healthcare, research, and counseling. Many students explore online degrees that complement neuroscience—such as counseling, psychology, or therapy—to expand their expertise and employability.

If you’re interested in clinical roles, consider enrolling in a cacrep-accredited program to gain credentials recognized nationwide. For those focused on affordability, you can discover the cheapest online master's in counseling options, which allow you to develop vital counseling skills at a lower cost.

If family counseling or therapy interests you, qualifying for an LMFT is possible through an accredited lmft degree online program. Alternatively, pursuing the cheapest online master’s in psychology can be excellent for students looking to deepen their understanding of behavior and mental processes alongside neuroscience.

Blending neuroscience knowledge with these related online degrees can give you a competitive edge in research, therapy, or mental health services, positioning you for success in a rapidly evolving field.

Best Scientists Citing Randy M. Bruno

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles