World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
78
Citations
23394
World Ranking
1695
National Ranking
779

Richard S. Mann publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard S. Mann sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 161 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Richard S. Mann D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard S. Mann sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard S. Mann is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their research spans multiple subfields including Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Plant Science, Genetics, and Cell Biology.

Their work focuses on several main topics:

  • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Richard S. Mann has published numerous papers, with some recent notable titles including:

  • Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity from sequencing data with interpretable machine learning (2022, Nature Biotechnology)
  • A Systematic Nomenclature for the Drosophila Ventral Nerve Cord (2020, Neuron)
  • Dense and pleiotropic regulatory information in a developmental enhancer (2020, Nature)
  • A size principle for recruitment of Drosophila leg motor neurons (2020, eLife)
  • Cell-type-specific Hox regulatory strategies orchestrate tissue identity (2021, Current Biology)

Frequent coauthors in their research include Siqian Feng, Ryan Loker, Harmen J. Bussemaker, Davys H. Lopez, and Kevin D. Rostam. These collaborations have appeared across various studies contributing significantly to the development of their research themes.

Richard S. Mann has been published primarily in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Current Biology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Nature Biotechnology. The majority of their publications are found in bioRxiv, reflecting a strong engagement with preprint dissemination.

Best Publications

  • Construction of a retrovirus packaging mutant and its use to produce helper-free defective retrovirus

    Richard Mann;Richard C. Mulligan;David Baltimore

  • The role of DNA shape in protein–DNA recognition

    Remo Rohs;Sean M. West;Alona Sosinsky;Alona Sosinsky;Peng Liu

  • Origins of Specificity in Protein-DNA Recognition

    Remo Rohs;Xiangshu Jin;Sean M. West;Rohit Joshi

  • Improved reference genome of Aedes aegypti informs arbovirus vector control

    Benjamin J. Matthews;Benjamin J. Matthews;Olga Dudchenko;Olga Dudchenko;Sarah B. Kingan;Sergey Koren

  • Swept confocally-aligned planar excitation (SCAPE) microscopy for high speed volumetric imaging of behaving organisms.

    Matthew B. Bouchard;Venkatakaushik Voleti;César S. Mendes;Clay Lacefield

  • Segmental expression of Hoxb-1 is controlled by a highly conserved autoregulatory loop dependent upon exd/pbx

    Helke Pöpperl;Mariann Bienz;Michèle Studer;Siu-Kwong Chan

  • Cofactor Binding Evokes Latent Differences in DNA Binding Specificity between Hox Proteins

    Matthew G Slattery;Todd Riley;Peng Liu;Peng Liu;Namiko Abe

  • Extra specificity from extradenticle: the partnership between HOX and PBX/EXD homeodomain proteins.

    Richard S. Mann;Siu-Kwong Chan

  • Nuclear Translocation of Extradenticle Requires homothorax, which Encodes an Extradenticle-Related Homeodomain Protein

    Gabrielle E Rieckhof;Fernando Casares;Hyung Don Ryoo;Muna Abu-Shaar

  • The DNA binding specificity of ultrabithorax is modulated by cooperative interactions with extradenticle, another homeoprotein

    Siu-Kwong Chan;Leah Jaffe;Maria Capovilla;Juan Botas

  • Hox proteins meet more partners

    Richard S Mann;Markus Affolter

  • Structure of a DNA-bound Ultrabithorax–Extradenticle homeodomain complex

    Jonathan M. Passner;Hyung Don Ryoo;Leyi Shen;Richard S. Mann

  • Low affinity binding site clusters confer hox specificity and regulatory robustness.

    Justin Crocker;Namiko Abe;Lucrezia Rinaldi;Alistair P. McGregor

  • Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure

    Rohit Joshi;Jonathan M. Passner;Remo Rohs;Remo Rohs;Rinku Jain

  • Hox specificity unique roles for cofactors and collaborators.

    Richard S. Mann;Katherine M. Lelli;Rohit Joshi

  • Control of antennal versus leg development in Drosophila

    Fernando Casares;Richard S. Mann

  • Functional dissection of ultrabithorax proteins in D. melanogaster

    Richard S. Mann;David S. Hogness

  • Generation of multiple antagonistic domains along the proximodistal axis during Drosophila leg development

    M. Abu-Shaar;R.S. Mann

  • Disentangling the Many Layers of Eukaryotic Transcriptional Regulation

    Katherine M. Lelli;Matthew Slattery;Richard S. Mann

  • Regulation of Hox target genes by a DNA bound Homothorax/Hox/Extradenticle complex.

    Hyung Don Ryoo;Thomas Marty;Fernando Casares;Markus Affolter

Frequent Co-Authors

Harmen J. Bussemaker
Harmen J. Bussemaker Columbia University
Barry Honig
Barry Honig Columbia University
Remo Rohs
Remo Rohs University of Southern California
Markus Affolter
Markus Affolter University of Basel
J. Spencer Johnston
J. Spencer Johnston Texas A&M University
Kevin P. White
Kevin P. White National University of Singapore
David L. Stern
David L. Stern Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Robb Krumlauf
Robb Krumlauf Stowers Institute for Medical Research
Daniel E. Neafsey
Daniel E. Neafsey Broad Institute
David J. Merritt
David J. Merritt University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in Genetics but open to flexible or related career opportunities? There are numerous online degrees and career pathways in health and life sciences worth exploring. Medical billing and coding, for example, offer a fast route into the healthcare industry. Wondering about the investment? Find out how much does it cost to become a medical coder and see if this administrative option fits your goals.

For those drawn to patient care, you might consider schools that offer a smooth admission process. Check out good nursing schools with high acceptance rates as an accessible entry point into nursing.

Interested in healthcare management? There are numerous healthcare administration online degree programs available, many offering fast-track options. Cost-conscious students can also explore the cheapest mha programs online to earn a master’s in healthcare administration without breaking the bank.

Each pathway offers unique opportunities and entry points for those passionate about science, healthcare, and organizational leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Richard S. Mann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles