World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
8162
World Ranking
10545
National Ranking
660

Julie A. Jacko publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie A. Jacko sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 165 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Julie A. Jacko D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie A. Jacko sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julie A. Jacko is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses on Medicine and Health Professions, with significant contributions in subfields such as General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Emergency Medicine, and Epidemiology.

Their published work spans various topics within healthcare and public health, including:

  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Public Health Policies and Education

Julie A. Jacko has contributed articles to multiple frequent publication venues. These include:

  • HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine
  • Population Health Management
  • Age and Ageing
  • Scientific Reports
  • BMC Geriatrics

Recent notable papers authored or coauthored by Julie A. Jacko are:

  • New horizons in systems engineering and thinking to improve health and social care for older people, 2024, Age and Ageing
  • Disparities in Emergency Department Visits for Opioid and Stimulant Overdoses in Florida During COVID-19, 2022, Population Health Management
  • Transitioning to Value-Based Diabetes Care: A Call for Action Derived from Primary Care Providers in South Florida, 2020, HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine
  • A Call to Action: Preventing Opioid and Substance Abuse in South Florida Youth, 2021, HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine
  • Redesign of US Medical Schools: A Shift from Health Service to Population Health Management, 2021, Population Health Management

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Julie A. Jacko include:

  • François Sainfort
  • Timothy F. Page
  • Johannes Vieweg
  • Bruce Guthrie
  • Atul Anand

Best Publications

  • Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Role of Interaction in Information Visualization

    Ji Soo Yi;Youn ah Kang;J.T. Stasko;J.A. Jacko

  • Human-Computer Interaction : Theory and Practice (part 2), Volume 2

    Julie Jacko;Constantine Stephanidis

  • A review and a framework of handheld computer adoption in healthcare.

    Yen Chiao Lu;Yan Xiao;Andrew Sears;Julie A. Jacko

  • Understanding and characterizing insights: how do people gain insights using information visualization?

    Ji Soo Yi;Youn-ah Kang;John T. Stasko;Julie A. Jacko

  • Hierarchical Menu Design: Breadth, Depth, and Task Complexity:

    Julie A. Jacko;Gavriel Salvendy

  • Dust & magnet: multivariate information visualization using a magnet metaphor

    Ji Soo Yi;Rachel Melton;John Stasko;Julie A. Jacko

  • Capturing the effects of context on human performance in mobile computing systems

    Leon Barnard;Ji Soo Yi;Julie A. Jacko;Andrew Sears

  • Evaluating usability of a commercial electronic health record: A case study

    Paula J. Edwards;Kevin P. Moloney;Julie A. Jacko;François Sainfort

  • How do people tap when walking? An empirical investigation of nomadic data entry

    Min Lin;Rich Goldman;Kathleen J. Price;Andrew Sears

  • An empirical comparison of use-in-motion evaluation scenarios for mobile computing devices

    Leon Barnard;Ji Soo Yi;Julie A. Jacko;Andrew Sears

  • The effect of network delay and media on user perceptions of web resources

    Julie A. Jacko;Andrew L. Sears;Michael S. Borella

  • Internet delay effects: how users perceive quality, organization, and ease of use of information

    Andrew Sears;Julie A. Jacko;Michael S. Borella

  • International Aspects of World Wide Web Usability and the Role of High-End Graphical Enhancements

    Andrew Sears;Julie A. Jacko;Erica M. Dubach

  • The role of visual search in the design of effective soft keyboards

    Andrew Sears;Julie A. Jacko;Josey Y. M. Chu;Francisco Moro

  • Reading on-the-go: a comparison of audio and hand-held displays

    Kristin Vadas;Nirmal Patel;Kent Lyons;Thad Starner

  • Human-Computer Interaction: Development Process

    Andrew Sears;Julie A. Jacko

  • Modelling of menu design in computerized work

    Julie A. Jacko;Gavriel Salvendy;Richard J. Koubek

  • Behavior and information technology

    Andrew Sears;Julie A. Jacko

  • Designing interfaces for an overlooked user group: considering the visual profiles of partially sighted users

    Julie A. Jacko;Andrew Sears

  • Human-Computer Interaction : Theory and Practice (part 1), Volume 1

    Julie A. Jacko;Constantine Stephanidis

  • Human-Computer Interaction: Designing for Diverse Users and Domains

    Andrew Sears;Julie A. Jacko

Frequent Co-Authors

Gavriel Salvendy
Gavriel Salvendy University of Central Florida
Michael A. Gerber
Michael A. Gerber Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
William R. Hersh
William R. Hersh Oregon Health & Science University
Robert A. Greenes
Robert A. Greenes Arizona State University
John Stasko
John Stasko Georgia Institute of Technology
Ingrid U. Scott
Ingrid U. Scott Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up a wide array of opportunities beyond traditional degree programs. Many students and working professionals choose online options for their flexibility and fast-tracked routes to career advancement.

If you’re seeking a solid foundation, an online associate degree in computer science or IT can launch your journey and help you enter the workforce quickly. For those aiming to upskill or change careers swiftly, consider pursuing certifications that pay well—these can open the door to lucrative tech roles in less time than a traditional degree.

Aspirants for advanced roles might be interested in the shortest online masters degree options. Such programs offer accelerated pathways so you can earn a credential quickly and remain competitive. Choosing one of the most in demand masters degrees will ensure your skills stay relevant as the tech industry evolves.

By exploring these flexible learning and career pathways, you’ll have more options to match your goals—whether you wish to enter the field, change directions, or advance your position in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Julie A. Jacko

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles