World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Ran Barkai publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ran Barkai sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Ran Barkai D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ran Barkai sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Archaeology
  • Paleontology
  • Ecology

His main research concerns Cave, Lower Paleolithic, Archaeology, Paleontology and Pleistocene. When carried out as part of a general Cave research project, his work on Speleothem is frequently linked to work in Hominidae, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study. His Lower Paleolithic study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Blade, Upper Paleolithic, Middle Paleolithic and Zooarchaeology.

His Archaeology study combines topics in areas such as Paleozoology and Deciduous teeth. The study incorporates disciplines such as Mousterian and Southern Levant in addition to Paleontology. As a member of one scientific family, Ran Barkai mostly works in the field of Pleistocene, focusing on Lithic technology and, on occasion, Cenozoic and Quaternary.

His most cited work include:

  • Evidence for habitual use of fire at the end of the Lower Paleolithic: site-formation processes at Qesem Cave, Israel. (196 citations)
  • Cooperative hunting and meat sharing 400–200 kya at Qesem Cave, Israel (164 citations)
  • Evidence for the repeated use of a central hearth at Middle Pleistocene (300 ky ago) Qesem Cave, Israel (118 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Ran Barkai mainly investigates Archaeology, Cave, Pleistocene, Lower Paleolithic and Paleontology. His work on Assemblage, Prehistory and Southern Levant as part of general Archaeology research is frequently linked to Scraper site and Context, bridging the gap between disciplines. His studies in Cave integrate themes in fields like Blade, Taphonomy and Hearth.

His study in Pleistocene is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Stone tool, Human evolution, Neanderthal and Mammoth. His Lower Paleolithic study combines topics in areas such as Period, Lithic technology, Flake and Old World. His work focuses on many connections between Ecology and other disciplines, such as Upper Paleolithic, that overlap with his field of interest in Zooarchaeology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Archaeology (69.67%)
  • Cave (57.38%)
  • Pleistocene (38.52%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Lower Paleolithic (31.15%)
  • Cave (57.38%)
  • Archaeology (69.67%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Lower Paleolithic, Cave, Archaeology, Pleistocene and Ecology. The various areas that he examines in his Lower Paleolithic study include Animal bone, Middle Paleolithic, Old World and Mineralogy. Ran Barkai has included themes like Sturnus, Corvus ruficollis and Early Pleistocene in his Middle Paleolithic study.

His studies deal with areas such as Type, Period and Hearth as well as Cave. His study in the field of Paleoanthropology, Acheulean and Prehistory also crosses realms of Functional role. His Pleistocene study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Zoology and Anatomy.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Recycling for a purpose in the late Lower Paleolithic Levant: Use-wear and residue analyses of small sharp flint items indicate a planned and integrated subsistence behavior at Qesem Cave (Israel). (22 citations)
  • Animal residues found on tiny Lower Paleolithic tools reveal their use in butchery. (18 citations)
  • Are there marrow cavities in Pleistocene elephant limb bones, and was marrow available to early humans? New CT scan results from the site of Castel di Guido (Italy) (14 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Archaeology
  • Ecology
  • Paleontology

Ran Barkai mainly focuses on Pleistocene, Lower Paleolithic, Cave, Archaeology and Flake. His Pleistocene research includes themes of Anatomy and Limb bones. His research integrates issues of Ecology, Old World, Corvus ruficollis and Archaeological record in his study of Lower Paleolithic.

He interconnects Zoology, Sturnus and Early Pleistocene in the investigation of issues within Cave. His work in the fields of Subsistence agriculture and Paleoanthropology overlaps with other areas such as Animal material, Process and Caloric intake. Ran Barkai integrates Flake with Survival strategy in his research.

Best Publications

  • Evidence for habitual use of fire at the end of the Lower Paleolithic: site-formation processes at Qesem Cave, Israel.

    Panagiotis Karkanas;Ruth Shahack-Gross;Avner Ayalon;Mira Bar-Matthews

  • Cooperative hunting and meat sharing 400–200 kya at Qesem Cave, Israel

    Mary C. Stiner;Ran Barkai;Avi Gopher

  • Evidence for the repeated use of a central hearth at Middle Pleistocene (300 ky ago) Qesem Cave, Israel

    R. Shahack-Gross;F. Berna;P. Karkanas;C. Lemorini

  • Man the fat hunter: the demise of Homo erectus and the emergence of a new hominin lineage in the Middle Pleistocene (ca. 400 kyr) Levant.

    Miki Ben-Dor;Avi Gopher;Israel Hershkovitz;Ran Barkai

  • Hearth-side socioeconomics, hunting and paleoecology during the late Lower Paleolithic at Qesem Cave, Israel

    Mary C. Stiner;Avi Gopher;Ran Barkai

  • Uranium series dates from Qesem Cave, Israel, and the end of the Lower Palaeolithic.

    R Barkai;A Gopher;S E Lauritzen;Amos Frumkin

  • Middle Pleistocene dental remains from Qesem Cave (Israel).

    Israel Hershkovitz;Patricia Smith;Rachel Sarig;Rolf Quam;Rolf Quam

  • Systematic blade production at late Lower Paleolithic (400-200 kyr) Qesem Cave, Israel.

    Ron Shimelmitz;Ran Barkai;Avi Gopher

  • Fat residue and use-wear found on Acheulian biface and scraper associated with butchered elephant remains at the site of Revadim, Israel.

    Natalya Solodenko;Andrea Zupancich;Stella Nunziante Cesaro;Ofer Marder

  • Use-wear analysis of an Amudian laminar assemblage from the Acheuleo-Yabrudian of Qesem Cave, Israel

    Cristina Lemorini;Mary C. Stiner;Avi Gopher;Ron Shimelmitz

  • The chronology of the late Lower Paleolithic in the Levant based on U–Th ages of speleothems from Qesem Cave, Israel

    A. Gopher;A. Ayalon;M. Bar-Matthews;R. Barkai

  • Qesem Cave: An Amudian Site in Central Israel

    Avi Gopher;Ran Barkai;Ron Shimelmitz;Muhamad Khalaily

  • Using Bones to Shape Stones: MIS 9 Bone Retouchers at Both Edges of the Mediterranean Sea

    Ruth Blasco;Jordi Rosell;Felipe Cuartero;Josep Fernández Peris

  • Elephant and Mammoth Hunting during the Paleolithic: A Review of the Relevant Archaeological, Ethnographic and Ethno-Historical Records

    Aviad Agam;Ran Barkai

  • A blade for all seasons? Making and using Amudian blades at Qesem Cave, Israel

    R. Barkai;C. Lemorini;R. Shimelmitz;Z. Lev

  • Elephants at the Middle Pleistocene Acheulian open-air site of Revadim Quarry, Israel

    R. Rabinovich;O. Ackermann;E. Aladjem;R. Barkai

  • Fire for a Reason: Barbecue at Middle Pleistocene Qesem Cave, Israel

    Ran Barkai;Jordi Rosell;Ruth Blasco;Avi Gopher

  • Flint and stone axes as cultural markers : socio-economic changes as reflected in holocene flint tool industries of the southern Levant

    Ran Barkai

  • New datings of Amudian layers at Qesem Cave (Israel): results of TL applied to burnt flints and ESR/U-series to teeth

    Norbert Mercier;Hélène Valladas;Christophe Falguères;Qingfeng Shao

  • Cultural and Biological Transformations in the Middle Pleistocene Levant: A View from Qesem Cave, Israel

    Ran Barkai;Avi Gopher

  • Dental calculus reveals potential respiratory irritants and ingestion of essential plant-based nutrients at Lower Palaeolithic Qesem Cave Israel

    Karen Hardy;Anita Radini;Anita Radini;Stephen Buckley;Rachel Sarig;Rachel Sarig

Frequent Co-Authors

Avi Gopher
Avi Gopher Tel Aviv University
Jordi Rosell
Jordi Rosell Rovira i Virgili University
Ruth Blasco
Ruth Blasco Catalan Institute of Human Paleoecology and Social Evolution
Panagiotis Karkanas
Panagiotis Karkanas American School of Classical Studies at Athens
Amos Frumkin
Amos Frumkin Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Peter W. Kubik
Peter W. Kubik ETH Zurich
Antoni Margalida
Antoni Margalida Spanish National Research Council
Elisabetta Boaretto
Elisabetta Boaretto Weizmann Institute of Science
Matthias Meyer
Matthias Meyer Max Planck Society
Svante Pääbo
Svante Pääbo Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Earth Science, exploring related online degrees can provide diverse career opportunities. While many think of traditional science roles, degrees like a master of fine arts online offer creative avenues tied to environmental communication and education.

Similarly, understanding organizational dynamics is critical in science-related fields. Pursuing a masters degree in human resource management online can equip environmental firms and research institutions with the leadership skills needed to manage interdisciplinary teams effectively.

For non-traditional students or lifelong learners, several degrees for seniors provide accessible options to pivot or deepen their knowledge in Earth Science and related areas, highlighting the flexibility online education offers at any stage of life.

Additionally, those interested in the stewardship and organization of scientific knowledge might consider ala accredited mlis programs. These programs prepare professionals for careers managing scientific libraries and archives, vital for preserving Earth Science research and resources.

Best Scientists Citing Ran Barkai

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles