World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
6521
World Ranking
12475
National Ranking
5061

Michael B. Twidale publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael B. Twidale sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 209 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael B. Twidale D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael B. Twidale sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael B. Twidale is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research contributions span primarily within the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Information Systems, Human-Computer Interaction, Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The key topics addressed in their work include:

  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Usability and User Interface Design
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Some notable recent publications by Michael B. Twidale are:

  • "Metaphors in Voice User Interfaces: A Slippery Fish" (2023) published in ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • "A state of the art and scoping review of embodied information behavior in shared, co-present extended reality experiences" (2022) published in Electronic Imaging
  • "A Scoping Review of Mental Model Research in HCI from 2010 to 2021" (2023) published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • "Everyone everywhere: A distributed and embedded paradigm for usability" (2021) published in Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
  • "It's Still Rock and Roll to Me: A Model of Online Browsing Behaviour" (2022) published in Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as the Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, SSRN Electronic Journal, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Electronic Imaging, and Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

Frequent collaborators of Michael B. Twidale include:

  • Christopher Lueg
  • Smit Desai
  • David M. Nichols
  • Dana McKay
  • George Buchanan

Best Publications

  • A framework for information quality assessment

    Besiki Stvilia;Les Gasser;Michael B. Twidale;Linda C. Smith

  • Information quality work organization in wikipedia

    Besiki Stvilia;Michael B. Twidale;Linda C. Smith;Les Gasser

  • Browsing is a collaborative process

    Michael B. Twidale;David M. Nichols;Chris D. Paice

  • INFORMATION QUALITY IN A COMMUNITY-BASED ENCYCLOPEDIA

    Besiki Stvilia;Michael B. Twidale;Les Gasser;Linda C. Smith

  • Assessing information quality of a community-based encyclopedia

    Besiki Stvilia;Michael Bernard Twidale;Linda C Smith;Les Gasser;Les Gasser

  • The usability of open source software

    David M. Nichols;Michael Bernard Twidale

  • Usability and open source software.

    David M. Nichols;Michael B. Twidale

  • Ethnomethodologically Informed Ethnography and Information System Design.

    Andy Crabtree;David M. Nichols;Jon O'Brien;Mark Rouncefield

  • Integrating ethnography into the requirements engineering process

    I. Sommerville;T. Rodden;P. Sawyer;R. Bentley

  • Situated evaluation for cooperative systems

    Michael Twidale;David Randall;Richard Bentley

  • Over the Shoulder Learning: Supporting Brief Informal Learning

    Michael B. Twidale

  • Resolving Incommensurable Debates: A Preliminary Identification of Persona Kinds, Attributes, and Characteristics

    Ingbert R. Floyd;M. Cameron Jones;Michael B. Twidale

  • Usability processes in open source projects

    David M. Nichols;Michael B. Twidale

  • Collaborative browsing and visualization of the search process

    Michael Bernard Twidale;David M. Nichols

  • Web Mash-ups and Patchwork Prototyping: User-driven technological innovation with Web 2.0 and Open Source Software

    I.R. Floyd;M.C. Jones;D. Rathi;M.B. Twidale

  • Talking in the library: implications for the design of digital libraries

    Andy Crabtree;Michael B. Twidale;Jon O'Brien;David M. Nichols

  • Designing interfaces to support collaboration in information retrieval

    Michael Bernard Twidale;David Nichols

  • Exploring Usability Discussions in Open Source Development

    M.B. Twidale;D.M. Nichols

  • Is 'Quality' Metadata 'Shareable' Metadata? The Implications of Local Metadata Practice on Federated Collections

    Sarah L. Shreeves;Ellen M. Knutson;Besiki Stvilia;Carole L. Palmer

  • Metadata Quality for Federated Collections

    Besiki Stvilia;Les Gasser;Michael B. Twidale;Sarah L. Shreeves

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom Rodden
Tom Rodden University of Nottingham
Les Gasser
Les Gasser University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Ian Sommerville
Ian Sommerville University of St Andrews
Andy Crabtree
Andy Crabtree University of Nottingham
Mark Rouncefield
Mark Rouncefield Lancaster University
Jeff Huang
Jeff Huang Brown University
Steve Benford
Steve Benford University of Nottingham
Brian P. Bailey
Brian P. Bailey University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Ann Blandford
Ann Blandford University College London
Kevin Hamilton
Kevin Hamilton University of Hawaii at Manoa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees opens new opportunities for students interested in technology and science fields. Many accredited online schools that accept low gpa offer flexible admissions, making it easier for learners with varying academic backgrounds to begin their journey in Computer Science.

For those seeking rapid entry into the tech workforce, a computer science accelerated program can help you earn your degree faster and launch your career sooner. Many programs also provide online options for pursuing specialized interests.

If your passion extends to environmental fields, several affordable and accessible online programs are available. Completing an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online can lead to diverse career roles focused on sustainable technology and infrastructure.

Graduates from programs in environmental science and engineering can qualify for high-paying jobs with environmental science degree credentials. These pathways offer excellent prospects in both private and public sectors, blending technological impact with environmental stewardship.

Best Scientists Citing Michael B. Twidale

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles