World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
73
Citations
16550
World Ranking
19708
National Ranking
9814

Rakesh K. Gupta publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rakesh K. Gupta sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 319 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Rakesh K. Gupta D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rakesh K. Gupta sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Clinical Proton MR Spectroscopy in Central Nervous System Disorders

    Gülin Öz;Jeffry R. Alger;Peter B. Barker;Robert Bartha

  • Oxidative stress and antioxidants in disease and cancer: a review.

    Rakesh Kumar Gupta;Amit Kumar Patel;Niranjan Shah;Arun Kumar Choudhary

  • Characterization of intracranial mass lesions with in vivo proton MR spectroscopy.

    H. Poptani;R. K. Gupta;Raja Roy;Rakesh Pandey

  • Relationships Between Choline Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Quantitative Histopathology in Human Glioma

    Rakesh K. Gupta;Timothy F. Cloughesy;Usha Sinha;Justine Garakian

  • Improved survival in the treatment of squamous carcinoma of the oral tongue

    Dido Franceschi;Rakesh Gupta;Ronald H. Spiro;Jatin P. Shah

  • Comparative evaluation of fungal, tubercular, and pyogenic brain abscesses with conventional and diffusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopy.

    G. Luthra;A. Parihar;K. Nath;S. Jaiswal

  • Rheological Behavior of Filled Polymeric Systems I. Yield Stress and Shear‐Thinning Effects

    A. J. Poslinski;M. E. Ryan;R. K. Gupta;S. G. Seshadri

  • Demonstration of interstitial cerebral edema with diffusion tensor MR imaging in type C hepatic encephalopathy

    Ravindra A. Kale;Rakesh K. Gupta;Vivek A. Saraswat;Khader M. Hasan

  • MR imaging of central nervous system tuberculosis.

    Jinkins;Gupta R;Chang Kh;Rodriguez-Carbajal J

  • Interstitial Lung Disease in India. Results of a Prospective Registry

    Sheetu Singh;Bridget F. Collins;Bharat B. Sharma;Jyotsna M. Joshi

  • The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of intracranial cystic mass lesions: a report of 147 lesions

    Jaypal Sangala Reddy;Asht Mangal Mishra;Sanjay Behari;Mazhar Husain

  • Serial Changes in the White Matter Diffusion Tensor Imaging Metrics in Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury and Correlation with Neuro-Cognitive Function

    Raj Kumar;Mazhar Husain;Rakesh K. Gupta;Khader M. Hasan

  • MR imaging of intracranial tuberculomas.

    R K Gupta;A Jena;A Sharma;D K Guha

  • Differentiation of tuberculous from pyogenic brain abscesses with in vivo proton MR spectroscopy and magnetization transfer MR imaging.

    Rakesh K. Gupta;Davender K. Vatsal;Nuzat Husain;Sanjeev Chawla

  • Role of diffusion-weighted imaging and in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the differential diagnosis of ring-enhancing intracranial cystic mass lesions.

    Asht M Mishra;Rakesh K Gupta;Ramandeep S Jaggi;Jaipal S Reddy

  • Diffusion tensor fractional anisotropy of the normal-appearing seven segments of the corpus callosum in healthy adults and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.

    Khader M. Hasan;Rakesh K. Gupta;Rafael M. Santos;Jerry S. Wolinsky

  • Inverse correlation between choline magnetic resonance spectroscopy signal intensity and the apparent diffusion coefficient in human glioma.

    Rakesh K. Gupta;Usha Sinha;Timothy F. Cloughesy;Jeffry R. Alger

  • Comparative evaluation of corpus callosum DTI metrics in acute mild and moderate traumatic brain injury: Its correlation with neuropsychometric tests

    Raj Kumar;Rakesh K Gupta;Mazhar Husain;Chaynika Chaudhry

  • Minimal hepatic encephalopathy: Consensus statement of a working party of the Indian National Association for Study of the Liver

    Radha K. Dhiman;Vivek A. Saraswat;Barjesh K. Sharma;Shiv Kumar Sarin

  • Rheological Behavior of Filled Polymeric Systems II. The Effect of a Bimodal Size Distribution of Particulates

    A. J. Poslinski;M. E. Ryan;R. K. Gupta;S. G. Seshadri

Frequent Co-Authors

Ponnada A. Narayana
Ponnada A. Narayana The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
R.P. Chhabra
R.P. Chhabra Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
James Sayre
James Sayre University of California, Los Angeles
Eli Ruckenstein
Eli Ruckenstein University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Jeffry R. Alger
Jeffry R. Alger University of California, Los Angeles
Jerry S. Wolinsky
Jerry S. Wolinsky The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Charles H. Hinkin
Charles H. Hinkin University of California, Los Angeles
Yon Rojanasakul
Yon Rojanasakul West Virginia University
Jayantee Kalita
Jayantee Kalita Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences
Charles A. Wilkie
Charles A. Wilkie Marquette University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in flexible entry points or alternative medical careers, there are several online degrees and career pathways to consider. Aspiring nurses may benefit from affordable degree options, such as the cheapest online bsn programs, which allow registered nurses to complete their bachelor’s degree at reduced costs while maintaining their current jobs.

Those who already hold a non-nursing bachelor's degree but wish to switch to nursing can explore direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors online. These accelerated programs provide a fast track to a master’s in nursing, opening doors to advanced roles in healthcare.

Entry barriers can be lower for some nursing programs—students looking for less competitive admissions criteria may research what is the easiest nursing school to get into. This is especially useful for those eager to begin their healthcare careers with minimal delays.

Beyond nursing, roles in healthcare administration and support—such as medical billing and coding—are also in demand. Prospective students seeking flexibility and financial support can explore medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid.

Best Scientists Citing Rakesh K. Gupta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles