World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 31 13660 13247 5447 5184 90 4129

Shantanu Sarkar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shantanu Sarkar between 1999 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shantanu Sarkar published across 19 years, from 1999 to 2017, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2006. 2 of the 110 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2006. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 11 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 2 publications
1999 2017

110 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shantanu Sarkar: publications per year, 1999 to 2017
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 1
2001 11
2002 3
2003 10
2004 4
2005 10
2006 19
2007 19
2008 2
2009 2
2010 8
2011 4
2012 2
2013 3
2014 3
2015 5
2016 0
2017 2
Total 110
Download as CSV

Shantanu Sarkar publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shantanu Sarkar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 82–91 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 90 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324 90
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Shantanu Sarkar D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shantanu Sarkar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30–31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879 31
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Computer network
  • Telecommunications
  • Database

His primary areas of investigation include Multimedia, World Wide Web, Videoconferencing, Computer network and Real-time computing. His Multimedia study incorporates themes from Mobile device, Search engine indexing and Signal quality. His work on Session is typically connected to Connection, Processing Instruction and Test as part of general World Wide Web study, connecting several disciplines of science.

Shantanu Sarkar interconnects Video capture, Video processing, Network packet, Resource and Video camera in the investigation of issues within Videoconferencing. His Resource allocation, Call control and STREAMS study, which is part of a larger body of work in Computer network, is frequently linked to Event and Constant, bridging the gap between disciplines. His work carried out in the field of Real-time computing brings together such families of science as Digital audio, Audio signal flow, Delay and Synchronization.

His most cited work include:

  • System and method for performing distributed video conferencing (316 citations)
  • System and method for securing transactions in a contact center environment (159 citations)
  • Text to speech system and method having interactive spelling capabilities (126 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Computer network, World Wide Web, Multimedia, Session and Real-time computing. The Call control and Call management research Shantanu Sarkar does as part of his general Computer network study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Resource, Set and Voice over internet protocol voip, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science. His work in Call control covers topics such as Conference call which are related to areas like 3pcc.

His research links Human–computer interaction with World Wide Web. Shantanu Sarkar regularly ties together related areas like Video capture in his Multimedia studies. His Real-time computing research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Bandwidth, Audio signal flow, Videoconferencing and Network packet.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Computer network (38.46%)
  • World Wide Web (24.18%)
  • Multimedia (20.88%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2017)?

  • Computer network (38.46%)
  • Computer hardware (7.69%)
  • Wearable computer (3.30%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Computer network, Computer hardware, Wearable computer, Detector and Microphone. The various areas that he examines in his Computer network study include Wireless, Wireless distribution system and Embedded system. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Matrix mixer, Audio signal processing, Sound reinforcement system and Noise.

His Wearable computer study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Information privacy, World Wide Web and Human–computer interaction. His Detector study combines topics in areas such as Transmitter and Block. His Microphone research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Loudspeaker, Soundscape, Sound masking, Noise and Adaptation.

Between 2012 and 2017, his most popular works were:

  • Wearable User Device for Use in a User Authentication System (23 citations)
  • Headset Dictation Mode (10 citations)
  • Authentication server for a probability-based user authentication system and method (9 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Computer network
  • Telecommunications
  • Database

Shantanu Sarkar mostly deals with Computer network, Authentication server, Detector, User authentication and Wearable computer. His research on Computer network often connects related topics like Computer security. His study in Authentication server is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Generic Bootstrapping Architecture, Data Authentication Algorithm and Chip Authentication Program.

His work carried out in the field of Detector brings together such families of science as Embedded system, User device and Authentication.

Best Publications

  • System and method for performing distributed video conferencing

    Scott S. Firestone;Walter R. Friedrich;Nermin M. Ismail;Keith A. Lantz

  • System and method for securing transactions in a contact center environment

    Labhesh Patel;Shmuel Shaffer;Cullen Jennings;Shantanu Sarkar

  • Text to speech system and method having interactive spelling capabilities

    Shmuel Shaffer;Labhesh Patel;Shantanu Sarkar

  • Geographical Location Information/Signal Quality-Context Based Recording and Playback of Multimedia Data from a Conference Session

    Shmuel Shaffer;Mukul Jain;Jochen Weppner;Shantanu Sarkar

  • Navigation and coordination during emergencies

    Labhesh Patel;Shmuel Shaffer;Gebran Chahrouri;Shantanu Sarkar

  • Method and system for conducting conference calls with optional voice to text translation

    Shantanu Sarkar;Labhesh Patel;Shmuel Shaffer

  • Dynamically switched and static multiple video streams for a multimedia conference

    Randall Baird;Shantanu Sarkar;Ryan Knotts

  • Method and system for managing communication sessions between a text-based and a voice-based client

    Shmuel Shaffer;Johnny Hsienchow Lee;Shantanu Sarkar;Labhesh Patel

  • Method and system for determining a relative position of a device on a network

    Shantanu Sarkar;Steven G. Fry;Johnny C. Chan

  • Method and apparatus for using far end camera control (FECC) messages to implement participant and layout selection in a multipoint videoconference

    Duanpei Wu;Nermin M. Ismail;Shantanu Sarkar;Walter R. Friedrich

  • System and method for providing video conferencing synchronization

    Scott S. Firestone;Walter R. Friedrich;Nermin M. Ismail;Keith A. Lantz

  • Method and apparatus for controlling actions based on triggers in a conference

    Aseem Asthana;Ashish Chotai;Sravan Vadlakonda;Shantanu Sarkar

  • Conference resource allocation and dynamic reallocation

    Shantanu Sarkar;Ashish Chotai;Sravan Vadlakonda;Aseem Asthana

  • Method and system for controlling audio content during multiparty communication sessions

    Shmuel Shaffer;Shantanu Sarkar

  • Network resource optimization in a video conference

    Manjunath S. Bangalore;Shantanu Sarkar;Sravan Vadlakonda;Aseem Asthana

  • Apparatus and method for conducting a transfer of a conference call

    Shmuel Shaffer;Shantanu Sarkar

  • Method and system for utilizing proxy designation in a call system

    Shmuel Shaffer;Shantanu Sarkar;Labhesh Patel;Joseph F. Khouri

  • Versatile conference adapter and method employing same

    Aseem Asthana;Shantanu Sarkar;Ashish Chotai;Sravan Vadlakonda

  • Method and system for recording automatic call distributor calls

    Shmuel Shaffer;Labhesh Patel;Robert T. Bell;Shantanu Sarkar

  • Apparatus and method for allocating call resources during a conference call

    Shmuel Shaffer;Shantanu Sarkar

Frequent Co-Authors

Labhesh Patel
Labhesh Patel Jumio Corporation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the wide array of online degrees and certifications related to computer science can give you a competitive edge in today’s job market. Many U.S. schools now offer flexible programs, allowing you to specialize and advance your skills from anywhere in the world.

If you’re interested in foundational sciences, you might consider an online theoretical physics degree. This rigorous program supports a deep understanding of algorithms, modeling, and analytical thinking—skills that align closely with computing careers.

For tech-driven industries, pursuing a data scientist degree is an especially popular option, teaching students to interpret complex data and drive key decisions in business and research.

Technical roles are also in high demand, making electrical engineering degree online admissions a smart pathway for students interested in hardware, robotics, or IoT development.

If you’re looking for faster entry into the workforce, consider quick certifications that pay well. These programs can help you develop practical skills and land lucrative roles in tech, often without the time commitment of a full degree.

Best Scientists Citing Shantanu Sarkar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles