World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
57
Citations
15819
World Ranking
3377
National Ranking
1300

Prashant D. Sardeshmukh publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Prashant D. Sardeshmukh sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 134 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Prashant D. Sardeshmukh D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Prashant D. Sardeshmukh sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Prashant D. Sardeshmukh is affiliated with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, focusing particularly on climate variability and meteorological phenomena.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these fields, their work is concentrated in several subfields of study:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Oceanography
  • Water Science and Technology

Key topics covered in their research are:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing

Their publications frequently appear in established scientific venues, illustrating their engagement in climate and atmospheric sciences. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Climate
  • Climate of the past
  • Atmosphere
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Earth System Dynamics

Recent published papers demonstrate a focus on climate data evaluation, variability, and atmospheric processes:

  • "An Evaluation of the Performance of the Twentieth Century Reanalysis Version 3," 2020, Journal of Climate
  • "Impact of Annual Cycle on ENSO Variability and Predictability," 2020, Journal of Climate
  • "Uncertainties in Ocean Latent Heat Flux Variations over Recent Decades in Satellite-Based Estimates and Reduced Observation Reanalyses," 2020, Journal of Climate
  • "Influence of warming and atmospheric circulation changes on multidecadal European flood variability," 2022, Climate of the past
  • "Northern Hemisphere Extratropical Cyclone Activity in the Twentieth Century Reanalysis Version 3 (20CRv3) and Its Relationship with Continental Extreme Temperatures," 2022, Atmosphere

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their research profile. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Gilbert P. Compo
  • Laura Slivinski
  • Cécile Penland
  • Stefan Brönnimann
  • Ed Hawkins

Best Publications

  • The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project

    Gilbert P Compo;Gilbert P Compo;J. S. Whitaker;Prashant D Sardeshmukh;Prashant D Sardeshmukh;N. Matsui;N. Matsui

  • The Generation of Global Rotational Flow by Steady Idealized Tropical Divergence

    Prashant D. Sardeshmukh;Brian J. Hoskins

  • The Optimal Growth of Tropical Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies

    Cécile Penland;Prashant D. Sardeshmukh

  • Towards a more reliable historical reanalysis: improvements for version 3 of the Twentieth Century Reanalysis system

    Laura C. Slivinski;Laura C. Slivinski;Gilbert P. Compo;Gilbert P. Compo;Jeffrey S. Whitaker;Prashant D. Sardeshmukh;Prashant D. Sardeshmukh

  • Feasibility of a 100-Year Reanalysis Using Only Surface Pressure Data

    Gilbert P. Compo;Jeffrey S. Whitaker;Prashant D. Sardeshmukh

  • The effect of ENSO on the intraseasonal variance of surface temperatures in winter

    Catherine A. Smith;Prashant D. Sardeshmukh

  • Global Atmospheric Sensitivity to Tropical SST Anomalies throughout the Indo-Pacific Basin

    Joseph J. Barsugli;Prashant D. Sardeshmukh

  • An Evaluation of the Performance of the Twentieth Century Reanalysis Version 3

    L. C. Slivinski;L. C. Slivinski;G. P. Compo;G. P. Compo;P. D. Sardeshmukh;P. D. Sardeshmukh;J. S. Whitaker

  • Changes of Probability Associated with El Niño

    Prashant D. Sardeshmukh;Gilbert P. Compo;Cécile Penland

  • Removing ENSO-Related Variations from the Climate Record

    Gilbert P. Compo;Prashant D. Sardeshmukh

  • Diagnostics of the Global Atmospheric Circulation Based on ECMWF analyses 1979-1989

    B. J. Hoskins;H. H. Hsu;I. N. James;M. Masutani

  • Trends and low frequency variability of extra-tropical cyclone activity in the ensemble of twentieth century reanalysis

    Xiaolan L. Wang;Y. Feng;G. P. Compo;G. P. Compo;V. R. Swail

  • A Linear Theory of Extratropical Synoptic Eddy Statistics

    Jeffrey S. Whitaker;Prashant D. Sardeshmukh

  • Factors Determining the Extratropical Response to Equatorial Diabatic Heating Anomalies.

    Mingfang Ting;Prashant D. Sardeshmukh

  • Assessing a GCM's Suitability for Making Seasonal Predictions

    A. Kumar;M. Hoerling;M. Ji;A. Leetmaa

  • Spatial Smoothing on the Sphere

    Prashant D. Sardeshmukh;Brian I. Hoskins

  • The Diagnosis of Mechanical Dissipation in the Atmosphere from Large-Scale Balance Requirements

    Ernst Klinker;Prashant D. Sardeshmukh

  • Relative Contributions of Synoptic and Low-Frequency Eddies to Time-Mean Atmospheric Moisture Transport, Including the Role of Atmospheric Rivers

    Matthew Newman;George N. Kiladis;Klaus M. Weickmann;F. Martin Ralph

  • Reconciling Non-Gaussian Climate Statistics with Linear Dynamics

    Prashant D. Sardeshmukh;Philip Sura

  • Multiplicative Noise and Non-Gaussianity: A Paradigm for Atmospheric Regimes?

    Philip Sura;Matthew Newman;Cécile Penland;Prashant Sardeshmukh

  • A Linear Model of Wintertime Low-Frequency Variability. Part I: Formulation and Forecast Skill

    Christopher R. Winkler;Matthew Newman;Prashant D. Sardeshmukh

Frequent Co-Authors

Gilbert P. Compo
Gilbert P. Compo National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Matthew Newman
Matthew Newman National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Philip Jones
Philip Jones University of East Anglia
Stefan Brönnimann
Stefan Brönnimann University of Bern
Rob Allan
Rob Allan Met Office
Manola Brunet
Manola Brunet University of East Anglia
Xiaolan L. Wang
Xiaolan L. Wang Environment and Climate Change Canada
Russell S. Vose
Russell S. Vose National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Maurizio Maugeri
Maurizio Maugeri University of Milan
Antonietta Capotondi
Antonietta Capotondi National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Environmental Sciences often opens doors to various interdisciplinary online degrees and career paths. For professionals looking to enhance their expertise without committing to extensive requirements, exploring online edd programs no dissertation can be an attractive option. These programs focus on practical leadership skills that complement environmental research and policy work.

For educators or researchers aiming to advance further, online eds to edd bridge program options provide a seamless transition from a master's level to a doctoral degree, enhancing your qualifications in environmental education or administration.

Alternatively, for those interested in social advocacy within environmental contexts, fully funded doctoral programs like fully funded dsw programs support careers at the intersection of social work and sustainability, ensuring access to advanced education without financial barriers.

Lastly, if you seek a versatile foundation to complement environmental studies, consider a budget friendly online general studies degree. This flexible degree offers broad knowledge applicable across many environmental career roles.

Best Scientists Citing Prashant D. Sardeshmukh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles