World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Phillip J. Stansfeld

Phillip J. Stansfeld

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
57
Citations
10289
World Ranking
13974
National Ranking
1097

Phillip J. Stansfeld publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip J. Stansfeld sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 258 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Phillip J. Stansfeld D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip J. Stansfeld sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Phillip J. Stansfeld is affiliated with the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on Molecular Biology. Other notable subfields include Genetics, Ecology, Materials Chemistry, and Infectious Diseases.

Their research topics cover a range of areas with emphasis on bacterial genetics and biotechnology, microbial interactions, and molecular mechanisms involving lipids and proteins. These include:

  • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Ion channel regulation and function
  • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research

The publications of Phillip J. Stansfeld include recent papers spanning several high-impact venues. Selected examples are:

  • "The SARS-COV-2 Spike Protein Binds Sialic Acids and Enables Rapid Detection in a Lateral Flow Point of Care Diagnostic Device" (2020, ACS Central Science)
  • "Structures of the stator complex that drives rotation of the bacterial flagellum" (2020, Nature Microbiology)
  • "PyLipID: A Python Package for Analysis of Protein-Lipid Interactions from Molecular Dynamics Simulations" (2022, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation)
  • "CG2AT2: an Enhanced Fragment-Based Approach for Serial Multi-scale Molecular Dynamics Simulations" (2021, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation)
  • "Structure, substrate recognition and initiation of hyaluronan synthase" (2022, Nature)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Phillip J. Stansfeld include:

  • Robin A. Corey
  • Mark S.P. Sansom
  • C. Keith Cassidy
  • Owen N. Vickery
  • T. Bertie Ansell

The scientist has published extensively in specific venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biophysical Journal
  • Nature Communications
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Microbiology

Best Publications

  • The role of interfacial lipids in stabilizing membrane protein oligomers

    Kallol Gupta;Joseph A. C. Donlan;Jonathan T. S. Hopper;Povilas Uzdavinys

  • Structural basis for outer membrane lipopolysaccharide insertion

    Haohao Dong;Quanju Xiang;Yinghong Gu;Zhongshan Wang

  • MemProtMD: Automated Insertion of Membrane Protein Structures into Explicit Lipid Membranes.

    Phillip J. Stansfeld;Joseph E. Goose;Martin Caffrey;Elisabeth P. Carpenter

  • Structural basis of outer membrane protein insertion by the BAM complex

    Yinghong Gu;Huanyu Li;Haohao Dong;Yi Zeng

  • The SARS-COV-2 Spike Protein Binds Sialic Acids, and Enables Rapid Detection in a Lateral Flow Point of Care Diagnostic Device

    Alexander N. Baker;Sarah Jane Richards;Collette S. Guy;Thomas R. Congdon

  • Structures of ABCB10, a human ATP-binding cassette transporter in apo- and nucleotide-bound states

    Chitra A. Shintre;Ashley C. W. Pike;Qiuhong Li;Jung-In Kim

  • From Coarse Grained to Atomistic: A Serial Multiscale Approach to Membrane Protein Simulations.

    Phillip J. Stansfeld;Mark S.P. Sansom

  • Structural features of the glutamate binding site in recombinant NR1/NR2A N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors determined by site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling

    Philip E Chen;Matthew T Geballe;Phillip J Stansfeld;Alexander R Johnston

  • The pore structure and gating mechanism of K2P channels: K2P channel gating

    Paula L Piechotta;Markus Rapedius;Phillip J Stansfeld;Murali K Bollepalli

  • Structure of the TatC core of the twin-arginine protein transport system

    Sarah E. Rollauer;Michael J. Tarry;Michael J. Tarry;James E. Graham;James E. Graham;Mari Jääskeläinen

  • The pore structure and gating mechanism of K2P channels

    Paula L Piechotta;Markus Rapedius;Phillip J Stansfeld;Murali K Bollepalli

  • The MemProtMD database: a resource for membrane-embedded protein structures and their lipid interactions.

    Thomas D Newport;Mark S P Sansom;Phillip J Stansfeld

  • Molecular Simulation Approaches to Membrane Proteins

    Phillip J. Stansfeld;Mark S.P. Sansom

  • Structures of the stator complex that drives rotation of the bacterial flagellum.

    Justin C Deme;Steven Johnson;Owen Vickery;Owen Vickery;Amy Aron

  • PIP2-Binding Site in Kir Channels: Definition by Multiscale Biomolecular Simulations

    Phillip J. Stansfeld;Richard J. Hopkinson;Frances M. Ashcroft;Mark S. P. Sansom

  • The structural basis of lipid scrambling and inactivation in the endoplasmic reticulum scramblase TMEM16K.

    Bushell;Pike Acw.;M E Falzone;Rorsman Njg.

  • Structural basis of lipoprotein signal peptidase II action and inhibition by the antibiotic globomycin

    Lutz Vogeley;Toufic El Arnaout;Jonathan Bailey;Phillip J. Stansfeld

  • The Structural Basis of ZMPSTE24-Dependent Laminopathies

    Andrew Quigley;Yin Yao Dong;Ashley C. W. Pike;Liang Dong

  • Functional analysis of missense variants in the TRESK ( KCNK18 ) K + channel

    Isabelle Andres-Enguix;Lijun Shang;Phillip J. Stansfeld;Julia M. Morahan

  • A specific two-pore domain potassium channel blocker defines the structure of the TASK-1 open pore.

    Anne K. Streit;Michael F. Netter;Franca Kempf;Magdalena Walecki

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark S.P. Sansom
Mark S.P. Sansom University of Oxford
Stephen J. Tucker
Stephen J. Tucker University of Oxford
Carol V. Robinson
Carol V. Robinson University of Oxford
Frances M. Ashcroft
Frances M. Ashcroft University of Oxford
Tracy Palmer
Tracy Palmer Newcastle University
Ben C. Berks
Ben C. Berks University of Oxford
Michael J. Sutcliffe
Michael J. Sutcliffe University of Manchester
Susan M. Lea
Susan M. Lea University of Oxford
Erik Lindahl
Erik Lindahl Stockholm University
Martin Caffrey
Martin Caffrey Trinity College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to various online degrees and dynamic career paths in healthcare, research, and wellness. Many students with a background in these sciences pursue advanced studies that blend biology with other health fields.

For instance, an exercise science and nutrition degree online can lead to roles in sports performance or nutrition counseling. Those interested in movement and rehabilitation might find a kinesiology degree online appealing, paving the way for careers in physical therapy, athletics, or wellness coaching.

Advancing your qualifications is possible through focused postgraduate certificates. Nurses, for example, can enhance expertise in psychiatric care via the best online post master's pmhnp programs. Similarly, those interested in family practice can pursue a post masters fnp certification to qualify for advanced roles in primary care.

With the flexibility of online learning, students can tailor their biology or biochemistry background toward specialized pathways, positioning themselves for rewarding roles in today’s expanding health and science sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Phillip J. Stansfeld

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles