World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip R. Costanzo

Philip R. Costanzo

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9745 9118 5149 4700 95 6891

Philip R. Costanzo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip R. Costanzo between 1966 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip R. Costanzo published across 60 years, from 1966 to 2025, averaging 1.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2009. 2 of the 101 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2009. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 2 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1966 2025

101 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip R. Costanzo: publications per year, 1966 to 2025
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 0
1968 2
1969 1
1970 1
1971 1
1972 0
1973 3
1974 1
1975 1
1976 1
1977 1
1978 0
1979 3
1980 2
1981 1
1982 2
1983 0
1984 1
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 3
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 3
1994 1
1995 1
1996 2
1997 2
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 3
2002 4
2003 2
2004 1
2005 1
2006 0
2007 6
2008 2
2009 9
2010 2
2011 5
2012 3
2013 2
2014 2
2015 0
2016 2
2017 3
2018 0
2019 5
2020 1
2021 2
2022 2
2023 1
2024 1
2025 1
Total 101
Download as CSV

Philip R. Costanzo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip R. Costanzo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 95
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip R. Costanzo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip R. Costanzo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip R. Costanzo is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on Chemistry and Social Sciences. Within these fields, they have contributed extensively to Organic Chemistry and Education, with additional works relating to Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, and Applied Psychology.

Costanzo's work addresses a range of topics including Early Childhood Education and Development, Gender Roles and Identity Studies, Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions, Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes.

Key publication venues where Costanzo's research has appeared include:

  • The Journal of Organic Chemistry (2 publications)
  • Journal of Polymer Science (2 publications)
  • Substance Use & Misuse
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Organic Letters

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Costanzo are:

  • "Regulatory Focus and Substance Use in Adolescents: Protective Effects of Prevention Orientation," 2020, Substance Use & Misuse
  • "The influence of center-based care on young children's gender development," 2020, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
  • "The influence of siblings on ethnically diverse children's gender typing across early development," 2021, Developmental Psychology
  • "Ylidenenorbornadiene Carboxylates: Experimental Kinetic Analysis of a Nucleophile-Induced Fragmentation Reaction," 2022, Organic Letters
  • "Experimental and Theoretical Exploration of the Kinetics and Thermodynamics of the Nucleophile-Induced Fragmentation of Ylidenenorbornadiene Carboxylates," 2023, The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Costanzo include:

  • Yana Kuchirko
  • Anna Bennet
  • May Ling Halim
  • Diane N. Ruble
  • Scott J. L'Heureux

Their research contributions reflect interdisciplinary interests encompassing both chemical sciences and behavioral studies, with a notable focus on organic chemistry mechanisms and early childhood development in social contexts.

Best Publications

  • Theories of Social Psychology

    Marvin E. Shaw;Philip R. Costanzo

  • Weight stigmatization and ideological beliefs: relation to psychological functioning in obese adults.

    Kelli E. Friedman;Simona K. Reichmann;Philip R. Costanzo;Arnaldo Zelli

  • Domain-Specific Parenting Styles and Their Impact on the Child's Development of Particular Deviance: The Example of Obesity Proneness

    Philip R Costanzo;Erik Z. Woody

  • CONFORMITY AS A FUNCTION OF AGE LEVEL

    Philip R. Costanzo;Marvin E. Shaw

  • Body image partially mediates the relationship between obesity and psychological distress.

    Kelli E. Friedman;Simona K. Reichmann;Philip R. Costanzo;Gerard J. Musante

  • A reexamination of the effects of intent and consequence on children's moral judgments.

    Philip R. Costanzo;John D. Coie;Judy F. Grumet;Douglas Farnill

  • Effect of anticipated performance on the attributions of causality to self and others.

    Camille B. Wortman;Philip R. Costanzo;Thomas R. Witt

  • Posttraumatic symptomatology in children and adolescents after an industrial fire.

    John S. March;Lisa Amaya-Jackson;Robert Terry;Philip Costanzo

  • The effect of social cues on the eating behavior of obese and normal subjects.

    Judith C. Conger;Anthony J. Conger;Philip R. Costanzo;K. Lynn Wright

  • Intergenerational Continuities and Their Influences on Children’s Social Development

    Martha Putallaz;Philip R. Costanzo;Christina L. Grimes;Dana M. Sherman

  • Alcohol-consumption trajectories and associated characteristics among adults older than age 50.

    Alyssa Platt;Frank A. Sloan;Philip Costanzo

  • Conformity Development as a Function of Self-Blame.

    Philip R. Costanzo

  • Maternal socialization goals, parenting styles, and social-emotional adjustment among Chinese and European American young adults: testing a mediation model.

    Yan Li;Philip R. Costanzo;Martha Putallaz

  • The effects of taste and caloric perceptions on the eating behavior of restrained and unrestrained subjects

    Erik Z. Woody;Philip R. Costanzo;Heidi Liefer;Judith Conger

  • Parenting styles and body mass index trajectories from adolescence to adulthood.

    Bernard F. Fuemmeler;Chongming Yang;Phil Costanzo;Rick H. Hoyle

  • Specific transitions in the development of spatial perspective-taking ability.

    John D. Coie;Philip R. Costanzo;Douglas Farnill

  • Voice Quality Profile and Perceived Emotion.

    Frances S. Costanzo;Norman N. Markel;Philip R. Costanzo

  • Maternal Recollections of Childhood Peer Relationships: Implications for their Children's Social Competence

    Martha Putallaz;Philip R. Costanzo;Rebecca B. Smith

  • Peer Social Structure and Risk-Taking Behaviors Among African American Early Adolescents

    Shari Miller-Johnson;Philip R. Costanzo;John D. Coie;Mary R. Rose

  • The comorbidity of depression and eating dysregulation processes in a diet-seeking obese population: a matter of gender specificity.

    Gerard J. Musante;Philip R. Costanzo;Kelli E. Friedman

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick S. Malone
Patrick S. Malone Sapienza University of Rome
Frank A. Sloan
Frank A. Sloan Duke University
John D. Coie
John D. Coie Duke University
Andrea M. Hussong
Andrea M. Hussong University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Diane N. Ruble
Diane N. Ruble New York University
Jennifer E. Lansford
Jennifer E. Lansford Duke University
Amy G. Halberstadt
Amy G. Halberstadt North Carolina State University
Erik Z. Woody
Erik Z. Woody University of Waterloo
Timothy J. Strauman
Timothy J. Strauman Duke University
Gary M. Cox
Gary M. Cox Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens numerous opportunities for specialization and career growth, especially with online degree options now widely available. Many students are drawn to organizational psychology jobs, which blend psychology principles with workplace dynamics to improve productivity and employee satisfaction.

There are diverse job opportunities for psychologist graduates, ranging from clinical and counseling positions to roles in research, academia, and healthcare. The expanding field also includes opportunities in schools, corporate environments, and community organizations.

For those interested in assessment and measurement, psychometrist jobs focus on designing and interpreting psychological tests used in schools, clinics, or corporate settings. These roles are essential for evaluating cognitive, emotional, and behavioral health.

While a psychology career can be rewarding, it’s important to weigh the advantages of being a psychologist against potential challenges. Understanding the full range of pathways and specialties can help you select the best online degree and career fit based on your interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Philip R. Costanzo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles