World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Philip Jordan publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Jordan sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Philip Jordan D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Jordan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Agriculture
  • Ecology
  • Statistics

His scientific interests lie mostly in Hydrology, Eutrophication, Surface runoff, Water Framework Directive and Water quality. In his work, Soil type and Soil conditioner is strongly intertwined with Soil test, which is a subfield of Hydrology. His research in Surface runoff intersects with topics in Soil water and Hydrology.

His Soil water research includes themes of Groundwater recharge and Drainage. His Water Framework Directive study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Agriculture and Agricultural land. His research in the fields of Nutrient pollution overlaps with other disciplines such as Function.

His most cited work include:

  • Characterising phosphorus transfers in rural catchments using a continuous bank-side analyser (158 citations)
  • Limitations of instantaneous water quality sampling in surface-water catchments: Comparison with near-continuous phosphorus time-series data (151 citations)
  • Evaluating the success of phosphorus management from field to watershed. (112 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Philip Jordan mostly deals with Hydrology, Water quality, Drainage basin, Agriculture and Eutrophication. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Soil water and Arable land. His Water Framework Directive study, which is part of a larger body of work in Water quality, is frequently linked to European union, bridging the gap between disciplines.

The Drainage basin study which covers Ecology that intersects with Animal science. His Agriculture research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Environmental resource management and Water resource management. His Eutrophication research integrates issues from Septic tank and Climate change.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Hydrology (70.45%)
  • Water quality (60.23%)
  • Drainage basin (31.82%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Water quality (60.23%)
  • Drainage basin (31.82%)
  • Biogeochemical cycle (7.95%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Water quality, Drainage basin, Biogeochemical cycle, Agriculture and Physical geography. His Water quality study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Land use and Water resource management. Drainage basin is a subfield of Hydrology that Philip Jordan studies.

He interconnects Sampling, Turbidity and Simple linear regression in the investigation of issues within Hydrology. His Biogeochemical cycle research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Nutrient management, Soil water, Land use, land-use change and forestry and Environmental resource management. He has researched Physical geography in several fields, including Invertebrate and Water Framework Directive.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Challenges of Reducing Phosphorus Based Water Eutrophication in the Agricultural Landscapes of Northwest Europe (54 citations)
  • Effects of agricultural land management changes on surface water quality: A review of meso-scale catchment research (31 citations)
  • Effects of agricultural land management changes on surface water quality: A review of meso-scale catchment research (31 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Agriculture
  • Ecology
  • Statistics

Drainage basin, Biogeochemical cycle, Water quality, Agriculture and Meso scale are his primary areas of study. The study incorporates disciplines such as Downstream and Pollution in addition to Biogeochemical cycle. His Downstream research incorporates elements of Climate change, Environmental resource management, Land use, land-use change and forestry and Eutrophication.

Philip Jordan has included themes like Climate pattern, Nutrient management, Nutrient and Physical geography in his Pollution study. You can notice a mix of various disciplines of study, such as Water resource management, Surface water quality, Agricultural land and Landscape engineering, in his Meso scale studies.

Best Publications

  • Limitations of instantaneous water quality sampling in surface-water catchments: Comparison with near-continuous phosphorus time-series data

    Rachel Cassidy;P. Jordan

  • Do septic tank systems pose a hidden threat to water quality

    Paul J.A. Withers;Philip Jordan;Linda May;Helen P. Jarvie

  • Characterising phosphorus transfers in rural catchments using a continuous bank-side analyser

    P. Jordan;A. Arnscheidt;H. McGrogan;S. McCormick

  • Evaluating the success of phosphorus management from field to watershed.

    Andrew N. Sharpley;Peter J.A. Kleinman;Philip Jordan;Lars Bergström

  • The seasonality of phosphorus transfers from land to water: implications for trophic impacts and policy evaluation

    Philip Jordan;A.R. Melland;P.-E. Mellander;G. Shortle

  • Patterns and processes of phosphorus transfer from Irish grassland soils to rivers—integration of laboratory and catchment studies

    Philip Jordan;Wayne Menary;Karen Daly;Gerard Kiely

  • A comparison of SWAT, HSPF and SHETRAN/GOPC for modelling phosphorus export from three catchments in Ireland

    Ahmed Elssidig Nasr;Michael Bruen;Phillip Jordan;Richard Moles

  • Challenges of Reducing Phosphorus Based Water Eutrophication in the Agricultural Landscapes of Northwest Europe

    Roland Bol;Gerard Gruau;Per-Erik Mellander;Remi Dupas

  • Quantifying nutrient transfer pathways in agricultural catchments using high temporal resolution data

    Per-Erik Mellander;Alice R. Melland;Philip Jordan;Philip Jordan;David P. Wall

  • Modelling soil phosphorus decline: Expectations of Water Framework Directive policies

    R. P. O. Schulte;A. R. Melland;O. Fenton;M. Herlihy

  • Using the nutrient transfer continuum concept to evaluate the European Union Nitrates Directive National Action Programme

    D. Wall;Philip Jordan;Philip Jordan;A. R. Melland;P. E. Mellander

  • Storm Event Suspended Sediment-Discharge Hysteresis and Controls in Agricultural Watersheds: Implications for Watershed Scale Sediment Management

    Sophie C. Sherriff;Sophie C. Sherriff;John S. Rowan;Owen Fenton;Philip Jordan

  • High-resolution phosphorus transfers at the catchment scale: the hidden importance of non-storm transfers

    Philip Jordan;Joerg Arnscheidt;H McGrogan;S McCormick;S McCormick

  • Effects of agricultural land management changes on surface water quality: A review of meso-scale catchment research

    A.R. Melland;A.R. Melland;O. Fenton;P. Jordan;P. Jordan

  • Defining the sources of low-flow phosphorus transfers in complex catchments.

    Joerg Arnscheidt;Philip Jordan;S. Li;S. McCormick

  • Nutrient emissions to water from septic tank systems in rural catchments: Uncertainties and implications for policy

    P.J.A. Withers;L. May;H.P. Jarvie;Philip Jordan

  • The Irish Agricultural Catchments Programme: catchment selection using spatial multi-criteria decision analysis

    R. M. Fealy;C. Buckley;S. Mechan;A. Melland

  • Time lag: a methodology for the estimation of vertical and horizontal travel and flushing timescales to nitrate threshold concentrations in Irish aquifers

    Owen Fenton;Rogier P.O. Schulte;Philip Jordan;Stanley T.J. Lalor

  • Mobilisation or dilution? Nitrate response of karst springs to high rainfall events

    Manuela Huebsch;Manuela Huebsch;Owen Fenton;Brendan Horan;Deirdre Hennessy

  • Low flow water quality in rivers; septic tank systems and high-resolution phosphorus signals

    Katrina Macintosh;Philip Jordan;Philip Jordan;R. Cassidy;Joerg Arnscheidt

  • Assessing the ecological status of candidate reference lakes in Ireland using palaeolimnology

    Manel Leira;Philip Jordan;David Taylor;Catherine Dalton

Frequent Co-Authors

Per-Erik Mellander
Per-Erik Mellander Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority
Owen Fenton
Owen Fenton Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority
Nicholas M. Holden
Nicholas M. Holden University College Dublin
Karl G. Richards
Karl G. Richards Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority
Helen Bennion
Helen Bennion University College London
Linda May
Linda May Natural Environment Research Council
Rogier P.O. Schulte
Rogier P.O. Schulte Wageningen University & Research
Helen P. Jarvie
Helen P. Jarvie University of Waterloo
Gerard Kiely
Gerard Kiely University College Cork
Brendan Horan
Brendan Horan Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise related to Environmental Sciences, exploring diverse online degree options can open new career opportunities. Many professionals pursue advanced qualifications, and programs like eds to edd programs online offer a pathway to leadership roles in education and policy development relevant to environmental studies.

Social work intersects with environmental justice, making online dsw programs in social work valuable for those aiming to support communities affected by environmental challenges. Additionally, students seeking a broad foundational knowledge may opt for an accredited affordable online general studies degree, which provides flexibility to combine environmental topics with other disciplines.

For newcomers, selecting one of the easiest bachelor degree to get can be a strategic stepping stone. These programs tend to offer straightforward curricula while building relevant skills, facilitating a smoother transition into specialized environmental roles or graduate studies.

Best Scientists Citing Philip Jordan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles