World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 46 16103 14531 78 68 232 7214

Petr Babula publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Petr Babula between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Petr Babula published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 14.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2010. 16 of the 328 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2010. 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 38 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 33 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 6 publications
2004 2025

328 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Petr Babula: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 6
2005 4
2006 7
2007 8
2008 9
2009 11
2010 38
2011 18
2012 33
2013 29
2014 30
2015 18
2016 21
2017 22
2018 12
2019 14
2020 11
2021 5
2022 6
2023 10
2024 10
2025 6
Total 328
Download as CSV

Petr Babula publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petr Babula sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 232 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216 232
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Petr Babula D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petr Babula sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776 46
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Petr Babula is affiliated with Masaryk University in Czech Republic and has a research focus primarily spanning medicine, biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, as well as agricultural and biological sciences.

Their scholarly work involves multiple subfields including plant science, molecular biology, biochemistry, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, and pollution. This interdisciplinary approach reflects in the variety of topics Petr Babula has studied, such as plant stress responses and tolerance, sulfur compounds in biology, wound healing and treatments, epigenetics and DNA methylation, amino acid enzymes and metabolism, lichen and fungal ecology, and cannabis and cannabinoid research.

Petr Babula has frequently published in several notable scientific journals. The most common publication venues include:

  • Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Biomolecules
  • Chemosphere
  • Environmental Pollution

Their recent publications cover a range of subjects related to biochemistry and molecular biology, plant science, and toxicology. Some notable papers include:

  • Iron Complexes of Flavonoids-Antioxidant Capacity and Beyond, 2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Signaling pathways in cutaneous wound healing, 2022, Frontiers in Physiology
  • Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Damage Tobacco BY-2 Cells by Oxidative Stress Followed by Processes of Autophagy and Programmed Cell Death, 2020, Nanomaterials
  • Role of Sodium/Calcium Exchangers in Tumors, 2020, Biomolecules
  • Root response in Pisum sativum under naproxen stress: Morpho-anatomical, cytological, and biochemical traits, 2020, Chemosphere

The collaboration network of Petr Babula includes frequent coauthors who have contributed recurrently to their research projects. Among the most common collaborators are:

  • Michal Masařík
  • Oľga Križanová
  • Zdeněk Kejík
  • Milan Jakubek
  • Jozef Kováčik

Their research demonstrates a multidimensional approach that combines biological, chemical, and medical sciences to address complex questions related to plant biology, cellular stress responses, and biochemical pathways. This work is situated at the intersection of fundamental science and applied research with implications for understanding biological stress mechanisms and therapeutic treatments.

Best Publications

  • Uncommon heavy metals, metalloids and their plant toxicity: a review

    Petr Babula;Vojtech Adam;Radka Opatrilova;Josef Zehnalek

  • Mammalian metallothioneins: properties and functions

    Petr Babula;Petr Babula;Michal Masarik;Vojtech Adam;Vojtech Adam;Tomas Eckschlager

  • Toxicity of aluminium oxide nanoparticles demonstrated using a BY-2 plant cell suspension culture model

    Zuzana Poborilova;Radka Opatrilova;Petr Babula

  • Content of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity in fruits of apricot genotypes.

    Jiri Sochor;Ondrej Zitka;Helena Skutkova;Dusan Pavlik

  • Iron Complexes of Flavonoids-Antioxidant Capacity and Beyond.

    Zdeněk Kejík;Robert Kaplánek;Robert Kaplánek;Michal Masařík;Petr Babula

  • Possible ecological risk of two pharmaceuticals diclofenac and paracetamol demonstrated on a model plant Lemna minor

    Marie Kummerová;Štěpán Zezulka;Petr Babula;Jan Tříska

  • Sarcosine as a potential prostate cancer biomarker--a review.

    Natalia Cernei;Zbynek Heger;Jaromir Gumulec;Ondrej Zitka

  • Evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of prenylated substances isolated from Morus alba and Morus nigra.

    Hana Zelová;Zuzana Hanáková;Zuzana Čermáková;Karel Šmejkal

  • Effect of five different stages of ripening on chemical compounds in medlar (Mespilus germanica L.).

    Otakar Rop;Jiri Sochor;Tunde Jurikova;Ondrej Zitka

  • Lemna minor exposed to fluoranthene: growth, biochemical, physiological and histochemical changes.

    Štěpán Zezulka;Marie Kummerová;Petr Babula;Lucie Váňová

  • Naphthoquinones as allelochemical triggers of programmed cell death

    Petr Babula;Vojtěch Adam;René Kizek;Zdeněk Sladký

  • Modern micro and nanoparticle-based imaging techniques.

    Marketa Ryvolova;Jana Chomoucka;Jana Drbohlavova;Pavel Kopel

  • Naphthoquinones and their pharmacological properties

    Babula P;Adam;Havel L;Kizek R

  • Multi-instrumental Analysis of Tissues of Sunflower Plants Treated with Silver(I) Ions - Plants as Bioindicators of Environmental Pollution.

    Sona Krizkova;Pavel Ryant;Olga Krystofova;Vojtech Adam

  • Hexavalent chromium damages chamomile plants by alteration of antioxidants and its uptake is prevented by calcium

    Jozef Kováčik;Petr Babula;Josef Hedbavny;Bořivoj Klejdus

  • Cisplatin-resistant prostate cancer model: Differences in antioxidant system, apoptosis and cell cycle

    Jaromir Gumulec;Jan Balvan;Marketa Sztalmachova;Martina Raudenska

  • Unexpected behavior of some nitric oxide modulators under cadmium excess in plant tissue.

    Jozef Kováčik;Petr Babula;Bořivoj Klejdus;Josef Hedbavny

  • Sunflower Plants as Bioindicators of Environmental Pollution with Lead (II) Ions.

    Olga Krystofova;Violetta Shestivska;Michaela Galiova;Karel Novotny

  • Complexes of Silver(I) Ions and Silver Phosphate Nanoparticles with Hyaluronic Acid and/or Chitosan as Promising Antimicrobial Agents for Vascular Grafts

    Dagmar Chudobova;Lukas Nejdl;Jaromir Gumulec;Olga Krystofova

  • From Na+/K+-ATPase and cardiac glycosides to cytotoxicity and cancer treatment.

    Petr Babula;Michal Masarik;Vojtech Adam;Ivo Provaznik

  • Electrochemical Sensors for Detection of Acetylsalicylic Acid.

    Veronika Supalkova;Jiri Petrek;Ladislav Havel;Sona Krizkova

  • Chromium uptake and consequences for metabolism and oxidative stress in chamomile plants.

    Jozef Kováčik;Jozef Kováčik;Petr Babula;Bořivoj Klejdus;Bořivoj Klejdus;Josef Hedbavny

Frequent Co-Authors

Rene Kizek
Rene Kizek University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Vojtech Adam
Vojtech Adam Central European Institute of Technology
Jozef Kováčik
Jozef Kováčik University of Trnava
Libuše Trnková
Libuše Trnková Masaryk University
Bořivoj Klejdus
Bořivoj Klejdus Mendel University Brno
Marie Stiborová
Marie Stiborová Charles University
Stefano Dall’Acqua
Stefano Dall’Acqua University of Padua
Jindrich Kynicky
Jindrich Kynicky Mendel University Brno
Jan Novak
Jan Novak University of Alabama at Birmingham
Tunde Jurikova
Tunde Jurikova Tomas Bata University in Zlín

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Chemistry, exploring related fields like forensic science and criminal justice can open diverse career opportunities. Pursuing an online forensic science degree combines scientific principles with legal applications, making it a natural extension for chemistry graduates seeking practical, real-world impact.

Those aiming for advanced specialization might consider a masters in forensic psychology online. This path integrates psychological insights with forensic methods, enabling careers that investigate the human factors behind crime, complementing scientific expertise.

Understanding potential earnings is crucial, and a forensic science degree salary generally reflects competitive compensation, especially in government and private sector roles. Salary potential often motivates students to invest in their education thoughtfully.

Cost is another key consideration. For those concerned about affordability, reviewing criminal justice degree online cost insights can be helpful. Many programs offer cost-effective online options that balance quality education with financial feasibility.

By linking Chemistry with these related disciplines, students can enhance their career pathways and leverage multidisciplinary knowledge to stand out in competitive job markets.

Best Scientists Citing Petr Babula

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles