World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
18112
World Ranking
18190
National Ranking
282

Peter Vock publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Vock sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 246 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter Vock D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Vock sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Vock is affiliated with the University of Bern in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a specialization in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. The topics commonly explored in their work include Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations, and Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

The scientist has contributed to scholarly literature, notably publishing in venues such as Swiss Medical Weekly.

  • The Swiss Approach - feasibility of a national low-dose CT lung cancer screening program, 2022, Swiss Medical Weekly

Frequent co-authors in Peter Vock's research include:

  • Lisa Jungblut
  • Christophe von Garnier
  • Milo A. Puhan
  • Yuki Tomonaga
  • Cornel Kaufmann

Peter Vock's work contributes to ongoing research in lung-related diseases, particularly focusing on early detection methods and treatment responses in lung cancer as well as the pathology of interstitial lung conditions.

Best Publications

  • Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation.

    W A Kalender;W Seissler;E Klotz;P Vock

  • Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)--a feasibility study

    Michael J. Thali;Kathrin Yen;Wolf Schweitzer;Peter Vock

  • Endurance training in humans: aerobic capacity and structure of skeletal muscle

    H. Hoppeler;H. Howald;K. Conley;S. L. Lindstedt

  • Prevention of High-Altitude Pulmonary Edema by Nifedipine

    Peter Bartsch;Marco Maggiorini;Manfred Ritter;Christof Noti

  • VIRTOPSY: Minimally Invasive, Imaging-guided Virtual Autopsy

    Richard Dirnhofer;Christian Jackowski;Peter Vock;Kimberlee Potter

  • Clinical and Radiologic Features of Pulmonary Edema

    Thomas Gluecker;Patrizio Capasso;Pierre Schnyder;François Gudinchet

  • Virtual autopsy using imaging: bridging radiologic and forensic sciences. A review of the Virtopsy and similar projects

    Stephan A. Bolliger;Michael J. Thali;Steffen Ross;Ursula Buck

  • Functional Evaluation of Transplanted Kidneys with Diffusion-weighted and BOLD MR Imaging: Initial Experience

    Harriet C Thoeny;Dominik Zumstein;Sonja Simon-Zoula;Ute Eisenberger

  • Neoplastic invasion of the laryngeal cartilage: comparison of MR imaging and CT with histopathologic correlation.

    M Becker;P Zbären;H Laeng;C Stoupis

  • VIRTOPSY—Scientific Documentation, Reconstruction and Animation in Forensic: Individual and Real 3D Data Based Geo-Metric Approach Including Optical Body/Object Surface and Radiological CT/MRI Scanning

    Michael J. Thali;Marcel Braun;Ursula Buck;Emin Aghayev

  • Nifedipine for High Altitude Pulmonary Oedema

    Oswald Oelz;Manfred Ritter;Rolf Jenni;Marco Maggiorini

  • Image-guided virtual autopsy findings of gunshot victims performed with multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent correlation between radiology and autopsy findings

    Michael J. Thali;Kathrin Yen;Peter Vock;Christoph Ozdoba

  • Clinical radiology and postmortem imaging (Virtopsy) are not the same: Specific and unspecific postmortem signs.

    Andreas Christe;Patricia Flach;Steffen Ross;Danny Spendlove

  • Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion. Fluoroscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery

    Michal Slomczykowski;Mini Roberto;Paul Schneeberger;Christoph Ozdoba

  • Use of multislice computed tomography in disaster victim identification--advantages and limitations.

    Martin Sidler;Christian Jackowski;Richard Dirnhofer;Peter Vock

  • Lung: spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique.

    P Vock;M Soucek;M Daepp;W A Kalender

  • Toward clinical X-ray phase-contrast CT: demonstration of enhanced soft-tissue contrast in human specimen.

    Tilman Donath;Franz Pfeiffer;Oliver Bunk;Christian Grünzweig

  • The Virtopsy Approach: 3D Optical and Radiological Scanning and Reconstruction in Forensic Medicine

    Michael J. Thali;Richard Dirnhofer;Peter Vock

  • Proximal coronary artery stenosis: Three‐dimensional MRI with fat saturation and navigator echo

    Markus F. Müller;Martin Fleisch;Randall Kroeker;Tushar Chatterjee

  • Patient exposure and image quality of low-dose pulmonary computed tomography angiography: comparison of 100- and 80-kVp protocols.

    Zsolt Szucs-Farkas;Luzia Kurmann;Tamara Strautz;Michael A. Patak

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Thali
Michael J. Thali University of Zurich
Peter Bärtsch
Peter Bärtsch Heidelberg University
Chris Boesch
Chris Boesch University of Bern
Gerhard Schroth
Gerhard Schroth University of Bern
Willi A. Kalender
Willi A. Kalender University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Urs E. Studer
Urs E. Studer University of Bern
Guido Schreurs
Guido Schreurs University of Bern
Bernhard Lämmle
Bernhard Lämmle University of Bern
Thierry Carrel
Thierry Carrel University of Bern
Franz Pfeiffer
Franz Pfeiffer Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a traditional medical degree is not the only route to a rewarding career in healthcare. Online education now offers a variety of alternative pathways, enabling students to enter the field more quickly and, often, at a lower cost. For instance, earning a bachelor of health information management online allows you to work with health data, ensuring accuracy and security in medical records.

Administrative roles are also accessible with shorter-term credentials. Completing an online medical billing and coding program prepares you to process insurance claims and manage billing operations for medical facilities.

For those interested in clinical practice, there are fully accredited options to earn your cheapest np school degree online, leading to becoming a nurse practitioner and providing advanced patient care. Or, if you’re seeking flexibility with a broad range of opportunities, a nursing degree online is a practical way to start a nursing career on your own schedule.

These online degrees offer flexible options and can fast-track your healthcare career, all while accommodating your lifestyle and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Vock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles