World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter T. Macklem

Peter T. Macklem

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
32457
World Ranking
9705
National Ranking
386

Peter T. Macklem publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter T. Macklem sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 321 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter T. Macklem D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter T. Macklem sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Canada Gairdner Wightman Award
  • 1982 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Science
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Peter T. Macklem was affiliated with McGill University in Canada. Their academic career included contributions recognized by prominent awards and memberships in notable scientific organizations.

They received the Canada Gairdner Wightman Award in 1999. Earlier, in 1982, they were named a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in the Academy of Science. Additionally, they held membership in the Association of American Physicians.

Data related to their research fields, subfields, main topics of work, recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, and book publications were not provided.

Best Publications

  • Site and Nature of Airway Obstruction in Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease

    James C. Hogg;Peter T. Macklem;W. M. Thurlbeck

  • Significance of the relationship between lung recoil and maximum expiratory flow.

    Jere Mead;James M. Turner;Peter T. Macklem;John B. Little

  • The relations between structural changes in small airways and pulmonary-function tests.

    M. Cosio;H. Ghezzo;J. C. Hogg;R. Corbin

  • The respiratory muscles.

    Charis Roussos;Peter T. Macklem

  • Diaphragmatic fatigue in man

    C. S. Roussos;P. T. Macklem

  • Clinical manifestations of inspiratory muscle fatigue

    Carol A. Cohen;Gary Zagelbaum;Ditza Gross;Ch Roussos

  • Contractile properties of the human diaphragm during chronic hyperinflation.

    Thomas Similowski;Sheng Yan;Alain P. Gauthier;Peter T. Macklem

  • Nutritional status and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    K Gray-Donald;L Gibbons;S H Shapiro;P T Macklem

  • Frequency dependence of compliance as a test for obstruction in the small airways

    Ann J. Woolcock;N. J. Vincent;Peter T. Macklem

  • Aminophylline Improves Diaphragmatic Contractility

    Aubier M;De Troyer A;Sampson M;Macklem Pt

  • Complex systems and the technology of variability analysis

    Andrew J E Seely;Peter T Macklem

  • Chest wall and lung volume estimation by optical reflectance motion analysis

    S. J. Cala;C. M. Kenyon;G. Ferrigno;P. Carnevali

  • Phonospirometry for non-invasive monitoring of respiration

    Cheng-Li Que;Peter T. Macklem;Suzanne M. Kelly;Krzystof Kolmaga

  • Effects of lung volume on maximal methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in normal humans.

    D. J. Ding;J. G. Martin;P. T. Macklem

  • Frequency dependence of flow resistance in patients with obstructive lung disease

    Gunnar Grimby;Tamotsu Takishima;William Graham;Peter Macklem

  • Human respiratory muscle actions and control during exercise

    A. Aliverti;S. J. Cala;R. Duranti;G. Ferrigno

  • Electromyogram pattern of diaphragmatic fatigue.

    D. Gross;A. Grassino;W. R. Ross;P. T. Macklem

  • A theoretical analysis of the effect of airway smooth muscle load on airway narrowing.

    P T Macklem

  • Site of Airway Obstruction in Asthma as Determined by Measuring Maximal Expiratory Flow Breathing Air and a Helium-Oxygen Mixture

    P. J. Despas;M. Leroux;P. T. Macklem

  • Aminophylline Improves Diaphragmatic Contractility

    M. Aubier;A. De Troyer;M. Sampson;P. T. Macklem

Frequent Co-Authors

James C. Hogg
James C. Hogg University of British Columbia
James G. Martin
James G. Martin McGill University Health Centre
Charis Roussos
Charis Roussos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Steven L. Kelly
Steven L. Kelly Swansea University
Charles G. Irvin
Charles G. Irvin University of Vermont
Joel D. Cooper
Joel D. Cooper University of Pennsylvania
Pierre Ernst
Pierre Ernst McGill University
Jason H. T. Bates
Jason H. T. Bates University of Vermont
Giancarlo Ferrigno
Giancarlo Ferrigno Polytechnic University of Milan
Marc Decramer
Marc Decramer KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals have more options than ever to begin or advance their careers through online education. Many students interested in the healthcare field explore the health information technology online degree, which prepares graduates to manage medical records and healthcare data securely.

For those who want to work behind the scenes in healthcare administration, medical billing and coding online courses offer the essential skills to process patient information and insurance claims accurately.

Nursing remains a high-demand field. Prospective nurses can save on tuition by enrolling in cheap online nursing programs that lead to RN or BSN qualifications. For registered nurses aiming for advanced clinical roles, cheapest online nurse practitioner programs provide a flexible pathway to becoming a nurse practitioner.

These online degrees allow students to balance work, family, and study, making a healthcare career accessible from anywhere. Consider these online pathways to join the growing American healthcare workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Peter T. Macklem

Recently Published Articles