World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
7058
World Ranking
7670
National Ranking
2737

Peter J. Shouse publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Shouse sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 108 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter J. Shouse D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Shouse sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter J. Shouse is affiliated with the Agricultural Research Service in the United States. Their work is positioned within the agricultural research sector, contributing to the scientific understanding and advancement in this field.

While there is no specific data on recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues available, the profile highlights the institutional connection of the scientist, which is a significant factor in their research environment and collaboration opportunities.

Details about book publications, main fields of study, and subfields are not provided, nor are there records of main topics covered in research. Similarly, information about awards or honors received is not listed.

The absence of specific publication and research topic data restricts further insight into the scientist's exact areas of expertise or thematic contributions. However, being part of the Agricultural Research Service suggests an emphasis on applied agricultural sciences, possibly involving aspects of crop production, pest management, soil science, or agricultural sustainability, which are common focal areas for this institution.

The profile reflects a current active status with no indication that the scientist is deceased, thereby implying ongoing potential contributions to their field.

Best Publications

  • Soil Electrical Conductivity and Soil Salinity: New Formulations and Calibrations

    J. D. Rhoades;N. A. Manteghi;P. J. Shouse;W. J. Alves

  • Comparison of HYDRUS-2D simulations of drip irrigation with experimental observations

    T. H. Skaggs;T. J. Trout;J. Simunek;P. J. Shouse

  • Scaling Parameter to Predict the Soil Water Characteristic from Particle-Size Distribution Data

    Lalit M. Arya;Feike J. Leij;Martinus Th. van Genuchten;Peter J. Shouse

  • Identifying Soil Properties that Influence Cotton Yield Using Soil Sampling Directed by Apparent Soil Electrical Conductivity

    D. L. Corwin;S. M. Lesch;P. J. Shouse;R. Soppe

  • Estimating soil salinity from saturated soil-paste electrical conductivity

    J. D. Rhoades;Nahid A. Manteghi;P. J. Shouse;W. J. Alves

  • Relationship between the Hydraulic Conductivity Function and the Particle-Size Distribution

    Lalit M. Arya;Feike J. Leij;Peter J. Shouse;Martinus Th. van Genuchten

  • Macroscopic approaches to root water uptake as a function of water and salinity stress

    Todd H. Skaggs;Martinus Th. van Genuchten;Peter J. Shouse;James A. Poss

  • A field test of the transfer function model for predicting solute transport

    William A. Jury;Lewis H. Stolzy;Peter Shouse

  • Frequency Dependence of the Complex Permittivity and Its Impact on Dielectric Sensor Calibration in Soils

    T. J. Kelleners;D. A. Robinson;P. J. Shouse;J. E. Ayars

  • Determining soil salinity from soil electrical conductivity using different models and estimates

    J. D. Rhoades;P. J. Shouse;W. J. Alves;Nahid A. Manteghi

  • Estimating Particle-Size Distribution from Limited Soil Texture Data

    T. H. Skaggs;L. M. Arya;P. J. Shouse;B. P. Mohanty

  • Simultaneous inverse estimation of soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters from transient field experiments: Homogeneous soil

    F. Abbasi;J. Simunek;J. Feyen;M. Th. van Genuchten

  • Overland Water Flow and Solute Transport: Model Development and Field-Data Analysis

    Fariborz Abbasi;Jirka Simunek;M. Th. van Genuchten;Jan Feyen

  • Minimizing Drift in Electrical Conductivity Measurements in High Temperature Environments using the EM-38

    D. A. Robinson;I. Lebron;S. M. Lesch;P. Shouse

  • Water Deficit Effects on Transpiration and Leaf Growth1

    Unknown

  • A three‐dimensional field study of solute transport through unsaturated, layered, porous media: 1. Methodology, mass recovery, and mean transport

    T. R. Ellsworth;W. A. Jury;F. F. Ernst;P. J. Shouse

  • Strategies for crop improvement for drought-prone regions

    Unknown

  • Irrigating Forage Crops with Saline Waters: 2. Modeling Root Uptake and Drainage

    T. H. Skaggs;P. J. Shouse;J. A. Poss

  • NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF RING-INFILTROMETERS UNDER VARIOUS SOIL CONDITIONS

    L. Wu;L. Pan;M. J. Roberson;P. J. Shouse

  • New Calibrations for Determining Soil Electrical Conductivity—Depth Relations from Electromagnetic Measurements

    J. D. Rhoades;S. M. Lesch;P. J. Shouse;W. J. Alves

  • Prediction of Boron Adsorption by Field Samples of Diverse Textures

    Sabine Goldberg;D. L. Corwin;P. J. Shouse;D. L. Suarez

  • Spatial Variability Of Soil Water Retention Functions In A Silt Loam Soil

    P. J. Shouse;W. B. Russell;D. S. Burden;H. M. Selim

  • Effect of high boron application on boron content and growth of melons

    Sabine Goldberg;P.J. Shouse;S.M. Lesch;C.M. Grieve

Frequent Co-Authors

Todd H. Skaggs
Todd H. Skaggs US Department of Agriculture
James E. Ayars
James E. Ayars Agricultural Research Service
Binayak P. Mohanty
Binayak P. Mohanty Texas A&M University
Donald L. Suarez
Donald L. Suarez Agricultural Research Service
Catherine M. Grieve
Catherine M. Grieve Agricultural Research Service
Robert C. Graham
Robert C. Graham University of California, Riverside
William A. Jury
William A. Jury University of California, Riverside
M. Th. van Genuchten
M. Th. van Genuchten Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Dennis L. Corwin
Dennis L. Corwin Agricultural Research Service
Laosheng Wu
Laosheng Wu University of California, Riverside

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career pathways, many of which benefit from interdisciplinary knowledge and advanced degrees. For professionals looking to enhance leadership skills in public policy and administration related to environmental issues, exploring the top online mpa programs can be a strategic move. These programs often focus on sustainable policy-making and resource management.

Understanding societal impacts on the environment is crucial, making degrees like the online sociology bachelor programs particularly valuable. They equip students with insights into human behavior, social structures, and community dynamics, which are essential for effective environmental planning and advocacy.

For those seeking advanced research or academic roles, pursuing doctoral degrees can be streamlined through options such as 1 year phd programs online no dissertation. These programs can accelerate one's career while allowing flexibility.

Additionally, educators and professionals aiming for leadership within environmental education may consider accredited programs. Notably, accredited eds to edd programs offer valuable pathways from a specialist-level degree to a doctorate in education, emphasizing both theory and practical leadership skills.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Shouse

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles