World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
4723
World Ranking
9441
National Ranking
217

Paul F.A.M. Römkens publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul F.A.M. Römkens sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 101 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Paul F.A.M. Römkens D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul F.A.M. Römkens sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Potentials and drawbacks of chelate-enhanced phytoremediation of soils.

    Paul Römkens;Lucas Bouwman;Jan Japenga;Cathrina Draaisma

  • Critical soil concentrations of cadmium, lead, and mercury in view of health effects on humans and animals.

    Wim de Vries;Paul F. A. M. Römkens;Gudrun Schütze

  • Effect of Ca on the solubility and molecular size distribution of DOC and Cu binding in soil solution samples

    Paul F. A. M. Römkens;Jan Dolfing

  • Prediction of Cadmium uptake by brown rice and derivation of soil-plant transfer models to improve soil protection guidelines.

    P.F.A.M. Römkens;H.Y. Guo;C.L. Chu;T.S. Liu

  • Cd, Cu AND Zn SOLUBILITY IN ARABLE AND FOREST SOILS: CONSEQUENCES OF LAND USE CHANGES FOR METAL MOBILITY AND RISK ASSESSMENT

    Paul F. A. M. Römkens;Wim Salomons

  • Transfer functions for solid‐solution partitioning of cadmium, copper, nickel, lead and zinc in soils: derivation of relationships for free metal ion activities and validation with independent data

    J.E. Groenenberg;P.F.A.M. Romkens;R.N.J. Comans;R.N.J. Comans;J. Luster

  • Evaluation of the Single Dilute (0.43 M) Nitric Acid Extraction to Determine Geochemically Reactive Elements in Soil.

    Jan E. Groenenberg;Paul F. A. M. Römkens;André Van Zomeren;Sonia M. Rodrigues

  • Characterization of soil heavy metal pools in paddy fields in Taiwan: chemical extraction and solid-solution partitioning

    Paul F. Römkens;Horng-Yuh Guo;Chien-Liang Chu;Tsang-Sen Liu

  • Mapping the probability of exceeding critical thresholds for cadmium concentrations in soils in the Netherlands

    D. J. Brus;J. J. de Gruijter;D. J. J. Walvoort;F. de Vries

  • Risk assessment for Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn in urban soils: Chemical availability as the central concept

    S.M. Rodrigues;N. Cruz;C. Coelho;B. Henriques

  • Functional stability of microbial communities in contaminated soils

    M.A. Tobor-Kaplon;J. Bloem;P.F.A.M. Römkens;P.C. de Ruiter

  • Evaluation of an approach for the characterization of reactive and available pools of twenty potentially toxic elements in soils: Part I - The role of key soil properties in the variation of contaminants' reactivity

    S.M. Rodrigues;B. Henriques;E. Ferreira da Silva;M.E. Pereira

  • Feasibility of phytoextraction to remediate cadmium and zinc contaminated soils

    G.F. Koopmans;P.F.A.M. Römkens;M.J. Fokkema;J. Song

  • Soil organic matter dynamics after the conversion of arable land to pasture

    Paul F.A.M. Römkens;Johannes van der Plicht;Jan Hassink

  • Interaction between Ca2+ and dissolved organic carbon: implications for metal mobilization

    Paul F. Römkens;Jan Bril;Wim Salomons

  • Occurrence of chloramphenicol in crops through natural production by bacteria in soil.

    Bjorn Berendsen;Mariel Pikkemaat;Paul Römkens;Robin Wegh

  • A chain modeling approach to estimate the impact of soil cadmium pollution on human dietary exposure.

    Eelco Franz;Paul Römkens;Leo van Raamsdonk;Ine van der Fels-Klerx

  • Effect of plant growth on copper solubility and speciation in soil solution samples

    P.F.A.M. Römkens;L.A. Bouwman;G.T. Boon

  • A framework to measure the availability of engineered nanoparticles in soils : Trends in soil tests and analytical tools

    S.M. Rodrigues;T. Trindade;A.C. Duarte;E. Pereira

  • Calculation of critical loads for cadmium, lead and mercury; background document to a mapping manual on critical loads of cadmium, lead and mercury

    W. de Vries;G. Schütze;S. Lofts;E. Tipping

Frequent Co-Authors

Armando C. Duarte
Armando C. Duarte University of Aveiro
Eduarda Pereira
Eduarda Pereira University of Aveiro
Jaap Bloem
Jaap Bloem Wageningen University & Research
Tito Trindade
Tito Trindade University of Aveiro
Rob N.J. Comans
Rob N.J. Comans Wageningen University & Research
Edward Tipping
Edward Tipping Lancaster University
Stephen Lofts
Stephen Lofts Natural Environment Research Council
Luís A.C. Tarelho
Luís A.C. Tarelho University of Aveiro
Wim Salomons
Wim Salomons Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Markus Meili
Markus Meili Stockholm University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. A geographic information systems degree is crucial for professionals focused on spatial data and environmental mapping. This skill set is increasingly important for managing natural resources and developing sustainable solutions.

Leadership and policy-making roles in environmental sectors often require public administration expertise. Pursuing a mpa one year program offers a fast-tracked path to enhance skills in governance and public policy, which can be applied to environmental regulation and community programs.

Understanding social dynamics is also key when addressing environmental challenges. Obtaining a best online sociology bachelor degree provides insights into human behavior, societal trends, and community development that complement environmental science knowledge.

For those aiming at advanced research or academic careers without lengthy dissertation commitments, pursuing a doctorate degree online no dissertation can be a practical option. This pathway facilitates leadership roles in education and policy, influencing environmental sustainability efforts.

Best Scientists Citing Paul F.A.M. Römkens

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles