World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 50 2822 2581 1362 1228 178 7998

Patrick Doreian publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patrick Doreian between 1969 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patrick Doreian published across 56 years, from 1969 to 2024, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2004. 2 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2004. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 2 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 5 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 3 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 5 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 7 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication
1969 2024

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patrick Doreian: publications per year, 1969 to 2024
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 2
1971 1
1972 1
1973 0
1974 5
1975 1
1976 3
1977 3
1978 0
1979 5
1980 2
1981 2
1982 3
1983 0
1984 4
1985 3
1986 3
1987 2
1988 6
1989 1
1990 5
1991 0
1992 3
1993 0
1994 6
1995 1
1996 7
1997 4
1998 3
1999 2
2000 2
2001 7
2002 2
2003 3
2004 20
2005 1
2006 4
2007 3
2008 6
2009 3
2010 3
2011 6
2012 7
2013 6
2014 15
2015 7
2016 5
2017 5
2018 5
2019 8
2020 3
2021 4
2022 1
2023 1
2024 1
Total 207
Download as CSV

Patrick Doreian publications per year - data summary

  • Patrick Doreian, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Pittsburgh, has 207 publications recorded across 56 years, from 1969 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1969 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive year is 2004, with 20 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1969, 1971, 1972, 1975 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 5 of the 56 years in the span carry no publications at all (1973, 1978, 1983, 1991 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.1 per year counting only the 51 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 10 publications, 5% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1969-1987: 41 publications (2.2 per year); 1988-2006: 77 publications (4.1 per year); 2007-2024: 89 publications (4.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Patrick Doreian publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Doreian sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–183 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 178 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313 178
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Patrick Doreian publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Patrick Doreian, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Pittsburgh, records 178 publications - the 55th percentile of the discipline.
  • 55% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Patrick Doreian, and about 45% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Patrick Doreian ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Patrick Doreian D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Doreian sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187 50
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Patrick Doreian D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Patrick Doreian, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Pittsburgh, records 50 D-Index - the 66th percentile of the discipline.
  • 66% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Patrick Doreian, and about 34% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Patrick Doreian ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Patrick Doreian is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within social sciences and physics and astronomy. Their work intersects several subfields including statistical and nonlinear physics, sociology and political science, political science and international relations, and communication.

Their research topics cover a range of areas focused on complex social and physical systems. These topics include:

  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Climate Change Communication and Perception

Doreian has contributed to academic literature with several recent papers. These include:

  • "Police recruit narratives and publicly oriented vocabularies of motive" (2023), published in the International Journal of Police Science & Management
  • "Public issues, policy proposals, social movements, and the interests of the Koch Brothers network of allies" (2021), published in Quality & Quantity
  • "Book Review: The Oxford Handbook of Social Networks" (2021), published in the Journal of Social Structure

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Doreian include:

  • Andrej Mrvar
  • Jesse Wozniak
  • Norman Conti

Their work has appeared in journals including the International Journal of Police Science & Management, Quality & Quantity, and the Journal of Social Structure.

Best Publications

  • A partitioning approach to structural balance

    Patrick Doreian;Andrej Mrvar

  • Linear Models with Spatially Distributed Data: Spatial Disturbances or Spatial Effects?

    Patrick Doreian

  • Some dynamics of social balance processes: bringing Heider back into balance theory

    Norman P Hummon;Patrick Doreian

  • Generalized blockmodeling of two-mode network data

    Patrick Doreian;Vladimir Batagelj;Anuška Ferligoj

  • Partitioning signed social networks

    Patrick Doreian;Andrej Mrvar

  • Estimating Linear Models with Spatially Distributed Data

    Patrick Doreian

  • Measuring Patterns of Acquaintanceship [and Comments and Reply]

    Peter D. Killworth;H. Russell Bernard;Christopher McCarty;Patrick Doreian

  • Fixed list versus snowball selection of social networks

    Patrick Doreian;Katherine L Woodard

  • Direct and indirect methods for structural equivalence

    Vladimir Batagelj;Anuška Ferligoj;Patrick Doreian

  • A BRIEF HISTORY OF BALANCE THROUGH TIME

    Patrick Doreian;Roman Kapuscinski;David Krackhardt;Janusz Szczypula

  • Social context, spatial structure and social network structure

    Patrick Doreian;Patrick Doreian;Norman Conti

  • An optimizational approach to regular equivalence

    Vladimir Batagelj;Patrick Doreian;Anuška Ferligoj

  • Structural equivalence in a psychology journal network

    Patrick Doreian

  • Collaboration structures in Slovenian scientific communities

    Luka Kronegger;Franc Mali;Anuška Ferligoj;Patrick Doreian

  • The dynamics and evolution of social networks

    Patrick Doreian;Frans N. Stokman

  • Causality in Social Network Analysis

    Patrick Doreian

  • With whom do researchers collaborate and why

    Hajdeja Igliăź;Patrick Doreian;Luka Kronegger;Anuška Ferligoj

  • Network Autocorrelation Models Some Monte Carlo Results

    Patrick Doreian;Klaus Teuter;Chi-Hsein Wang

  • On the dynamics of national scientific systems

    Luka Kronegger;Anuška Ferligoj;Patrick Doreian;Patrick Doreian

  • Defining and locating cores and boundaries of social networks

    Patrick Doreian;Katherine L. Woodard

  • Analyzing the Structure of the Centrality-Productivity Literature Created Between 1948 and 1979

    Norman P. Hummon;Patrick Doreian;Linton C. Freeman

  • The Problem of Solidarity: Theories and Models

    Patrick Doreian;Thomas J. Fararo

  • Spatial Statistics: Past, Present, and Future

    Brian Ripley;J. Keith Ord;Luc Anselin;Robert P. Haining

Frequent Co-Authors

Vladimir Batagelj
Vladimir Batagelj University of Ljubljana
Michael J. Brusco
Michael J. Brusco Florida State University
David Krackhardt
David Krackhardt Carnegie Mellon University
Ramayya Krishnan
Ramayya Krishnan Carnegie Mellon University
Tom A. B. Snijders
Tom A. B. Snijders University of Groningen
Sylvia Richardson
Sylvia Richardson University of Cambridge
Linton C. Freeman
Linton C. Freeman University of California, Irvine
Brian Francis
Brian Francis Lancaster University
Stanley Wasserman
Stanley Wasserman Indiana University
Peter Ghazal
Peter Ghazal Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of Social Sciences and Humanities education in the USA is evolving rapidly, with flexible online programs making advanced study more accessible than ever. Prospective students who wish to accelerate their education can now explore 1 year online masters programs, allowing for a quicker pathway to graduate qualifications without compromising quality.

For those at the undergraduate level, there are a range of accelerated online degrees that condense years of coursework into a faster, more efficient format—ideal for working adults or anyone eager to enter the workforce sooner.

Cost remains a key consideration for many. Students focused on careers in social work can benefit from the cheapest msw programs available online, helping to reduce debt while building vital skills. Those interested in behavioral analysis can pursue online bcba certification programs, which offer affordability and the credentials required to advance professionally.

With such a variety of online education options, students can find a pathway that fits both their budget and career ambitions in the social sciences and humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Doreian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles