D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 38 Citations 31,568 79 World Ranking 3097 National Ranking 1585

Research.com Recognitions

Awards & Achievements

1957 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social science
  • Statistics
  • Artificial intelligence

Social psychology, Random walk closeness centrality, Centrality, Social network and Betweenness centrality are his primary areas of study. His Social psychology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Cognitive psychology, Perception and Filling-in. The concepts of his Cognitive psychology study are interwoven with issues in Structural holes, Score and Interpretability.

His study brings together the fields of Katz centrality and Random walk closeness centrality. Linton C. Freeman is studying Network controllability, which is a component of Betweenness centrality. His studies in Network controllability integrate themes in fields like Theoretical computer science, Girvan–Newman algorithm and Degree.

His most cited work include:

  • Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification (10511 citations)
  • A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness (6073 citations)
  • The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science (1026 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Social psychology, Centrality, Structure, Social network and Structure. His work carried out in the field of Social psychology brings together such families of science as Cognitive psychology, Empirical research and Perception. His Random walk closeness centrality and Katz centrality study, which is part of a larger body of work in Centrality, is frequently linked to Measure, bridging the gap between disciplines.

His study on Random walk closeness centrality is covered under Betweenness centrality. His research on Betweenness centrality focuses in particular on Network controllability. In his papers, he integrates diverse fields, such as Structure, Theoretical computer science, Clique and Social group.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Social psychology (27.40%)
  • Centrality (10.96%)
  • Structure (9.59%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2003-2019)?

  • Structure (9.59%)
  • Social network (9.59%)
  • Knowledge management (4.11%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Linton C. Freeman focuses on Structure, Social network, Knowledge management, Social psychology and Organizational network analysis. His Structure study overlaps with Theoretical computer science and Geometry. His work on Social network analysis is typically connected to Natural and Movement as part of general Social network study, connecting several disciplines of science.

Linton C. Freeman performs integrative Knowledge management and Network structure research in his work. His Social group study, which is part of a larger body of work in Social psychology, is frequently linked to Group, bridging the gap between disciplines. Linton C. Freeman has researched Organizational network analysis in several fields, including Social network analysis and Sociology of scientific knowledge.

Between 2003 and 2019, his most popular works were:

  • The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science (1026 citations)
  • Maintaining the duality of closeness and betweenness centrality (84 citations)
  • The Development of Social Network Analysis—with an Emphasis on Recent Events (50 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social science
  • Statistics
  • Artificial intelligence

His scientific interests lie mostly in Data analysis, Intuition, Computational model, Cognitive science and Social relation.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification

Linton C. Freeman.
Social Networks (1978)

20086 Citations

A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness

Linton C. Freeman.
Sociometry (1977)

9880 Citations

The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science

Linton C. Freeman.
(2004)

1698 Citations

Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow

Linton C. Freeman;Stephen P. Borgatti;Douglas R. White.
Social Networks (1991)

1290 Citations

Visualizing Social Networks.

Linton C. Freeman.
Journal of Social Structure (2000)

1225 Citations

Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy

Linton C. Freeman;A. Kimball Romney;Sue C. Freeman.
American Anthropologist (1987)

783 Citations

Centrality in social networks: ii. experimental results☆

Linton C Freeman;Douglas Roeder;Robert R Mulholland.
Social Networks (1979)

674 Citations

The Sociological Concept of "Group": An Empirical Test of Two Models

Linton C. Freeman.
American Journal of Sociology (1992)

372 Citations

Research Methods in Social Network Analysis

Linton C. Freeman;Douglas R. White;A. Kimball Romney.
(1987)

356 Citations

Filling in the Blanks: A Theory of Cognitive Categories and the Structure of Social Affiliation

Linton C. Freeman.
Social Psychology Quarterly (1992)

313 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Linton C. Freeman

Kathleen M. Carley

Kathleen M. Carley

Carnegie Mellon University

Publications: 79

Loet Leydesdorff

Loet Leydesdorff

University of Amsterdam

Publications: 59

Stephen P. Borgatti

Stephen P. Borgatti

University of Kentucky

Publications: 46

Yong Deng

Yong Deng

Southwest University

Publications: 45

Han Woo Park

Han Woo Park

Yeungnam University

Publications: 44

Thomas W. Valente

Thomas W. Valente

University of Southern California

Publications: 41

Ronald S. Burt

Ronald S. Burt

University of Chicago

Publications: 38

Ulrik Brandes

Ulrik Brandes

ETH Zurich

Publications: 38

Carter T. Butts

Carter T. Butts

University of California, Irvine

Publications: 38

Enrico Zio

Enrico Zio

Polytechnic University of Milan

Publications: 33

Yong He

Yong He

Beijing Normal University

Publications: 32

Tao Zhou

Tao Zhou

University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Publications: 32

Karin Ingold

Karin Ingold

University of Bern

Publications: 31

Patrick Doreian

Patrick Doreian

University of Pittsburgh

Publications: 30

Luciano da Fontoura Costa

Luciano da Fontoura Costa

Universidade de São Paulo

Publications: 30

Ernesto Estrada

Ernesto Estrada

University of Zaragoza

Publications: 30

Trending Scientists

Eytan Adar

Eytan Adar

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

Chongjin Xie

Chongjin Xie

Alibaba Group (China)

Yasuo Takeda

Yasuo Takeda

Mie University

Nicolas Glaichenhaus

Nicolas Glaichenhaus

Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

Ondřej Novák

Ondřej Novák

Czech Academy of Sciences

Osami Kanagawa

Osami Kanagawa

École Normale Supérieure de Lyon

Ren Sun

Ren Sun

University of California, Los Angeles

Filippo Catani

Filippo Catani

University of Florence

Ronald J. Racine

Ronald J. Racine

McMaster University

Benjamin H. Brinkmann

Benjamin H. Brinkmann

Mayo Clinic

Beverly I. Fagot

Beverly I. Fagot

University of Oregon

Jaap H. van Dieën

Jaap H. van Dieën

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Christopher H. Schmid

Christopher H. Schmid

Brown University

Richard C. Daly

Richard C. Daly

Mayo Clinic

Vincenzo Mainieri

Vincenzo Mainieri

European Southern Observatory

Slavek M. Rucinski

Slavek M. Rucinski

University of Toronto

Something went wrong. Please try again later.